- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump says he won't give aid to California for the fires unless they pass Voter ID law
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:00 pm to Eurocat
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:00 pm to Eurocat
the state of CA refuses to verify who is a citizen and who is not in their state. they even use this fact against the federal government. there may be 10 million non citizens living in CA.
why should the federal government give 1 cent to non citizens in CA?
this is not about coercion on policy disputes. this is about not giving federal dollars to non citizens. Trump stated this.
why should the federal government give 1 cent to non citizens in CA?
this is not about coercion on policy disputes. this is about not giving federal dollars to non citizens. Trump stated this.
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 6:09 pm
0
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:26 pm to Eurocat
The new rules of the game. When we have a democratic president, no aid to states with republicans governors.
Oh well. That’s what republicans want.
Oh well. That’s what republicans want.
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 6:27 pm
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:33 pm to TBoy
quote:
The new rules of the game. When we have a democratic president, no aid to states with republicans governors.
Trump is coming through for North Carolina, which has a dem governor.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:37 pm to TBoy
You will be waiting 12 years at the earliest. Will you even be alive? 
Posted on 1/24/25 at 6:57 pm to TBoy
quote:
The new rules of the game. When we have a democratic president, no aid to states with republicans governors.
Oh well. That’s what republicans want.
The democrat presidential candidates will have to run specifically on reversing specific EOs
Do you really think you want that?
This election showed that they do not win when they cannot cheat. If CA had voter ID the Republicans would have 10 more seats there in the House.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:29 pm to Indefatigable
yeah, I'd expect you to defend that pathetic state.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:38 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Eurocat
This would appear to be bullshite.
I don't expect you to return to this thread.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:42 pm to Mandtgr47
quote:
yeah, I'd expect you to defend that pathetic state.
Hilarious seeing this from a board that is ostensibly filled with “small government” and federalism-minded individuals.
If the federal government can coerce California to bend the knee on unrelated political issues by withholding disaster funding, a future federal government can do the same to Louisiana, etc. That isn’t good for anyone.
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:43 pm to Eurocat
He should go to Ghana on vacation like Bass did.
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:45 pm to Gifman
quote:Trump won’t be president forever. And DC runs on revenge. Imagine after Katrina, Bush said “screw’em, too many democrats there” and left NOLA without any federal response.
Ok what’s the problem?
Ultimately the purpose of federal disaster funds isn’t to influence state election policy. Nothing good comes from federal
coercion—even whey your “team” does it
Posted on 1/24/25 at 7:46 pm to TBoy
quote:
When we have a democratic president, no aid to states with republicans governor
What federal laws are being broken by Republican governors?
Edit: I’ve got a downvote, but no answer to the question.
This post was edited on 1/24/25 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 1/25/25 at 6:57 am to Wolfwireless
quote:
Not that I disagree. I do agree. But if we take this stance, the next Dim administration will take this stance against pro 2a states. Or anti-abortion states. Or anti-trans states.
Speed limits, issuing state marriage licenses, seatbelt laws, DUI laws, it’s been done already.
We have SCOTUS president for Roe and 2A now and they already did this with dudes LARPing as female. I say do this for all “sanctuary” cities and states. No federal funds for non compliant states with sanctuary cities. None for sanctuary cities. If they believe in the cause enough to pay for it themselves then so be it.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 7:30 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Hilarious seeing this from a board that is ostensibly filled with “small government” and federalism-minded individuals.
hilarious seeing supposed informed individuals falling for bullshite because they are so eager to "get this board"
Posted on 1/25/25 at 8:11 am to Eurocat
Keep defending incompetency. See where that gets you.
Posted on 1/25/25 at 8:12 am to RohanGonzales
Are you saying the Voter ID comment is made up? What am I falling for?
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News