re: Trump Pardons Tina Peters

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

The problem is similar to one with cults when they're prosecuted.

Those who admit the issues and repent and criticize the cult will get leniency. Those who refuse and keep promoting the cult will get hammered.

Example: Allison Mack (Got 3 years instead of 14-17) v. Clare Bronfman (81 months) in the Nxivm case.

Had Peters come out and say she was taken advantage of by Mike Lindell's agents during her grieving period for her son, and it was all nonsense that she believed due to this exploitation, and it's all bunk, etc., she probably gets 0 jail time.

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

Hi Folks, Juan here:

New info on Tina Peters. If you haven’t heard, President Trump issued a pardon for Tina Peters yesterday! That’s the good news. The bad news is that Colorado Governor Polis has made it clear that he will not allow federal intervention into a Colorado State case; and he’s not letting Tina out.

What is not widely understood is that this was fully anticipated and researched.

President Trump is on very solid ground on multiple basis and multiple attorneys have vetted the process ahead.

So here's what I would say to everybody. Keep it simple. Federal law was broken by Colorado. Judge Matthew Barrett refused to let the jury hear her defense. Federal law requires the evidence be preserved. 41 motions were denied. The jury never got to hear the truth.

Mesa County Clerk Peters is the only clerk in the state of Colorado that preserved proof of Secretary of State Jenna Griswold's authorization of the deletion of State and federal election records illegally. Dominion vote systems did the deleting in violation of their contracts both State and Federal.


Three things…

One:

President Trump is about to reassert a Federal authority concerning pardons that existed prior to Lincoln. Just like ‘a previous court’ was wrong about Roe vs Wade, the states have been wrong for 150 years on presidential pardon authority. That is about to be challenged hard and Trump will easily win just like he did when Colorado courts unanimously worked to remove him from the ballot and the Supreme Court unanimously trounced the Colorado courts and put Trump on the ballot.


Two:

The Clerk manages, collects, tabulates, reports, protects election data for the US House of Representatives under Federal authority. This has been forgotten and over-written over time; it is about to be revisited. Three: Trump is going to declare a national emergency concerning elections. When he does, he will also exercise authority over every aspect of the election process and no court will have authority to challenge his actions within the context of that National Emergency. Dark to light. At that moment he can/will take physical custody of Tina as an expert and can even make her an election czar when her health is stabilized! For extra credit, Tina can assist and will be a witness/whistle blower concerning prison conditions and failures in the Colorado prison system…..that is also, now, an active federal investigation.


Finally, remember, the Justice Departments investigations concerning vote fraud in Colorado became criminal investigations six months ago! That’s not an earth quake, it may have started as chest pounding by the Gov and other state officials but soon it’s going to be knees knocking in the capitol buildings of Colorado! Juan

---

quote:

---

Send in the marines to break her out

---

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

In its order, the court acknowledged that Peters raises significant constitutional issues, including First Amendment and federal-law claims, but said those questions must first be addressed by Colorado courts. The ruling closed one door. It left the larger conflict untouched. The jury never weighed the central issue in the case—what federal election law required of a local clerk. Federal statutes require election officials to preserve records tied to federal elections. Peters has consistently maintained that her actions as Mesa County clerk were taken to comply with those federal preservation requirements. Her defense was that the evidence she preserved was required by federal law and could not legally be destroyed. At trial, the court ruled that jurors would not hear that defense. They were not allowed to consider whether federal law required the actions Peters was accused of taking or whether compliance with federal mandates explained those actions. The case proceeded without the jury evaluating that legal context.

---

quote:

---

While federal courts have declined to intervene judicially during the appeal, the Bureau of Prisons’ letter shows that federal officials reached a different conclusion administratively. The unredacted document reflects a federal assessment that Peters’ confinement conditions were incompatible with factors specific to her case. Colorado rejected that assessment and redacted it from public view. Habeas relief is narrow. Federal authority is not. Federal agencies retain authority over matters involving federal evidence, federal proceedings and the handling of individuals whose actions intersect with federal law. The Bureau of Prisons does not request custody of state inmates lightly, and requests like this are rare. That rarity makes the redactions more consequential, not less.

---

quote:

---

Naw.

Both the truth and law are being ignored by Tina's fans.

---

quote:

---

Or for why people are knowingly dishonest.

---

quote:

---

The judge provided examples of her *actions* that showed a lack of remorse.

---