- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump officially files lawsuit against WSJ
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:19 am to VOR
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:19 am to VOR
quote:
The WSJ will prevail.
Like CBS prevailed?
Like ABC prevailed?
quote:
Truth is a defense, and I’ suspect they can document the story, probably with a copy.
If they had the. Opt they’d have published it. The writing style in that letter is completely unlike anything Trump has ever wrote or said. Completely out of character for him. No one with the ability to use deductive reason believes for a moment Trump wrote such nonsense. The only ones buying into this story are the indoctrinated and delusional leftist idiots like you.
1
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:21 am to JPLSU1981
Exactly. Which is why the lawsuit is a bogus s are tactic.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:28 am to Free888
It will be paid for before he leaves
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:40 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
That's not a very good look.
What the hell does that mean??
I once had a severe attack of diarrhea about a mile away from home during my (at the time) 3-mile jog every morning.
THAT would not have been a 'very good look' - but who the hell would want to see it??
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 8:41 am
Posted on 7/19/25 at 8:59 am to Darth_Vader
I’m nether “indoctrinated” nor delusional, and I’m not an idiot. You,’however, need to learn the true definition of deductive reasoning…
Posted on 7/19/25 at 9:01 am to VOR
quote:
VOR
Do you ever tire of being dead arse wrong?
Posted on 7/19/25 at 9:23 am to Mushroom1968
I know that everyone here already knows everything, but this should be interesting for the rest of the world.
I don't have a clue if the letter is real or not, but one would think that the WSJ would've done some decent due diligence before taking the huge step to publish these words.
I also wonder if they have a copy of the letter that they held as more evidence that they will release in discovery, or in their rag in the coming weeks?
It'd be interesting to see if there really has been a suit filed, and then discovery on both sides.
I don't have a clue if the letter is real or not, but one would think that the WSJ would've done some decent due diligence before taking the huge step to publish these words.
I also wonder if they have a copy of the letter that they held as more evidence that they will release in discovery, or in their rag in the coming weeks?
It'd be interesting to see if there really has been a suit filed, and then discovery on both sides.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 9:40 am to Nursie21
Mark Halperin who strongly HINTED the hit piece on Trump was coming...
--Has insinuated that the story has no real legs and was weak in due diligence. As most oppo research smear pieces are.
--Has insinuated it was willy nilly put out as not an investigative piece-- but a hit piece to strike right when MAGA was angered with Bondi and Trump.
They failed.
--Has insinuated that the story has no real legs and was weak in due diligence. As most oppo research smear pieces are.
--Has insinuated it was willy nilly put out as not an investigative piece-- but a hit piece to strike right when MAGA was angered with Bondi and Trump.
They failed.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Mark Halperin
@MarkHalperin
My latest on @DailyMail
“In the immortal words of Jake Blues: ‘We're getting the band back together.' And in Trump World, that doesn't mean a sedate jazz quartet playing Sunday brunch at Mar-a-Lago….”
“Whatever legitimate gripes MAGA influencers may have had with Trump last week over his tease-and-freeze strategy with the Epstein files, they were instantly superseded by rage at the WSJ story.”
Posted on 7/19/25 at 9:45 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Mark Halperin who strongly HINTED the hit piece on Trump was coming...
--Has insinuated that the story has no real legs and was weak in due diligence. As most oppo research smear pieces are.
--Has insinuated it was willy nilly put out as not an investigative piece-- but a hit piece to strike right when MAGA was angered with Bondi and Trump.
They failed.
quote:
Mark Halperin
@MarkHalperin
My latest on @DailyMail
“In the immortal words of Jake Blues: ‘We're getting the band back together.' And in Trump World, that doesn't mean a sedate jazz quartet playing Sunday brunch at Mar-a-Lago….”
“Whatever legitimate gripes MAGA influencers may have had with Trump last week over his tease-and-freeze strategy with the Epstein files, they were instantly superseded by rage at the WSJ story.”
Thanks for your reply Angelle.
Does Mr Halperin's words help settle the issue in any way?
Posted on 7/19/25 at 9:46 am to cajunangelle
Wrong thread. Sorry
This post was edited on 7/19/25 at 9:48 am
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:07 am to Nursie21
Settle the issue with whom?
The neverTrumper and dem Trump haters-No.
Orange Man is Bad. Any words or action (whether real or fake) justifies getting Trump unfavored and his brand-MAGA ran out of DC.
The lawsuit. I would garner a wild guess...The 2 authors of this WSJ article smear against Trump. (It was political) Because the article itself had a photo of the influencers holding up the binders.- They wanted to throw fuel into the fire.
The authors of the article has been shown to be extreme political activist hacks. I would further go out on a limb and guess that these two have some high-powered money backing them that will pay them well-- and they will never have to retract or be shamed in their profession.
WSJ may settle out of court a huge donation to Trump's Library.
The neverTrumper and dem Trump haters-No.
Orange Man is Bad. Any words or action (whether real or fake) justifies getting Trump unfavored and his brand-MAGA ran out of DC.
The lawsuit. I would garner a wild guess...The 2 authors of this WSJ article smear against Trump. (It was political) Because the article itself had a photo of the influencers holding up the binders.- They wanted to throw fuel into the fire.
The authors of the article has been shown to be extreme political activist hacks. I would further go out on a limb and guess that these two have some high-powered money backing them that will pay them well-- and they will never have to retract or be shamed in their profession.
WSJ may settle out of court a huge donation to Trump's Library.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:24 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
But Violent Hip Swivel said he wouldn’t dare because the discovery would bury him?!?!
To paraphrase what Cher said in Mask, if Trump dug a hole every time his enemies tried to bury him then he’d be eating fricking chop suey in China.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:35 am to Nursie21
It doesn't matter if the letter is real or not. If it is part of the DOJ's Epstein files that alone is newsworthy and gives the WSJ all the cover it needs to report on it. I suspect the Trump lawsuit is just to make a point and they know it won't go far this time..
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:39 am to 94LSU
I wish he had sued them for $21 billion.
After he won, he could name it...................."21 Trump Street Journal".
After he won, he could name it...................."21 Trump Street Journal".
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:46 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Now I don't know if this shite's legit or not, but I do know this letter makes both these dudes look like weirdo creeps, who watch porn and jack off together. That's not a very good look.
If you don’t know if it’s legit, it doesn’t make anyone look like anything.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:47 am to MykTide
Violent hip swivel said this would never happen because Trump is afraid of discover
Trump has stated about the Dirty Dems. and what they did to the evidence. Without right out saying what happened, He knows that over time evidence was destroyed and harmful made up stuff was added. They had access and means to tamper witt the evidence.
Trump has stated about the Dirty Dems. and what they did to the evidence. Without right out saying what happened, He knows that over time evidence was destroyed and harmful made up stuff was added. They had access and means to tamper witt the evidence.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 10:56 am to rickyh
This would never get to discovery. The WSJ isn't claiming the letter is real they're reporting that this letter is in the pile of DOJ evidence. That's newsworthy and all they need.
Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:24 pm to 94LSU
Good point. If it isn’t in the pile of DOJ evidence, there would have been a denial…
Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:44 pm to VOR
Who in the DOJ leaked the leather birthday dossier to the WSJ? If it came from DOJ files?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 7/19/25 at 12:45 pm to VOR
quote:
I’m nether “indoctrinated” nor delusional, and I’m not an idiot. You,’however, need to learn the true definition of deductive reasoning…
I have said this multiple times about you as a poster you are beyond stupid and you lack the deductive reasoning necessary to comprehend reality in life
Is it your position that the production of this document is true and defensible and if so what is your basis
Are you willing to bet that there is a settlement and a payment to Trump or a defense in a victory for WSJ?
Page 5 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News