- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:26 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
The left is doxxing them and threatening to harm them and their families for detaining illegals
How many ICE agents have been harmed by American citizens? How many American citizens have been harmed by ICE agents?
One side is "threatening to harm". (yeah right, they arent the ones carrying guns).
The other side just killed an american citizen and shot another ones eyeball and turned them blind in the past handful couple days.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:26 pm to Harry Boutte
Yeah my 6 yo nephew couldn't get off work. Maybe next time.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:28 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Anti-Ice
Wrong.
I am not against enforcement of immigration and customs laws. I am against the State gunning down citizens in the street.
quote:
Tax the rich
It's not far left to want the rich to be taxed. Everyone has to have "skin in the game", even the rich, right?
Besides, I don't think relying on just taxing the poor would provide much revenue.
But ultimately, revenue isn't the problem. Spending is the problem.
quote:
Can’t define a woman.
Says who? A woman is a female human being. That's supposed to be "far left"?
I told you that you didn't know anything about me.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:37 pm to This GUN for HIRE
quote:
Maybe next time.
Funny thing, 77.3 million people may have voted for it, but 77.9 million people actually voted against it.
MAGA didn't even get 50% of the popular vote.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:43 pm to geauxEdO
The Whiskey Rebellion and hunting down Aaron Burr don’t have any correlation to Minnesota.
There is a high legal threshold for “insurrection” or “rebellion”. And protests are not necessarily riots.
But the Insurrection Act is certainly a hot button topic today for Constitutional Scholars and Lawyers today. Many are suggesting reforms are needed to restore the appropriate balance of power as was originally intended.
Also keep in mind that in 2025, The Supreme Court ruled that Trump had no legal justification for sending National Guard troops into Chicago.
There is a high legal threshold for “insurrection” or “rebellion”. And protests are not necessarily riots.
But the Insurrection Act is certainly a hot button topic today for Constitutional Scholars and Lawyers today. Many are suggesting reforms are needed to restore the appropriate balance of power as was originally intended.
Also keep in mind that in 2025, The Supreme Court ruled that Trump had no legal justification for sending National Guard troops into Chicago.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:45 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Also keep in mind that in 2025, The Supreme Court ruled that Trump had no legal justification for sending National Guard troops into Chicago.
Had he invoked the insurrection act?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 2:59 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
I am against the State gunning down citizens in the street.
quote:
It's not far left to want the rich to be taxed. Everyone has to have "skin in the game", even the rich, right?
48 percent of this country don’t have “skin in the game.” The top 1% pay about 40% of revenues. So yes. Wanting to tax the rich more is far left.
quote:
Says who? A woman is a female human being. That's supposed to be "far left"?
Can someone with XY chromosomes be a woman?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:00 pm to BBONDS25
No. Are you implying that no judicial review of invoking the Insurrection Act is possible?
Or that no review of the specific actions of those troops is possible?
Or that no review of the specific actions of those troops is possible?
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:01 pm to AGGIES
quote:
No. Are you implying that no judicial review of invoking the Insurrection Act is possible?
Of course not. Just pointing out that you pointing out the 2025 ruling is irrelevant.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:02 pm to Powerman
quote:
Is there any indication that they're trying to avoid the chaos?
No what’s going on is several issues which are not the Trump administrations fault.
1. Illegal immigrants with deportations orders are shielded in these so called “sanctuary cities” by (Democrat) leftist leadership in those cities and states.
2. Due to their self declared “sanctuary” status, they openly oppose and defy the federal government’s attempt to remove criminal aliens with orders to deport.
3. They oppose and defy by not cooperating. In the following ways:
A. Will not hand over criminal aliens who have been arrested to ICE. Instead they release them on the streets and even shield them.
B. Due to their noncompliance, ICE is forced to go door to door to capture criminal aliens with orders to deport.
C. Sanctuary cities now openly endorse leftists groups like ICE WATCH. They encourage mobs to follow ICE and BP around to interfere and impede the arrest of criminal aliens.
D. They do not allow local law enforcement to assist ICE and BP with controlling the mobs of unruly rioters.
All of this makes for dangerous situations for everyone involved and if anyone should be blamed, it’s the Democrats running these cities and states.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:07 pm to Harry Boutte
quote:
MAGA didn't even get 50% of the popular vote
Thats because the kids didn't get to vote
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:07 pm to TBoy
quote:Hahaha - it’ll be fun to watch you post whatever the next talking-points-pamphlet tells you to think…
Everyone knew that Trump's intent with the deployment of mass groups of ICE rambos was to create conflict.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:21 pm to TBoy
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:23 pm to TBoy
quote:
Everyone knew that Trump's intent with the deployment of mass groups of ICE rambos was to create conflict. That is what they are doing. Since day-1 right wingers have been parroting Steven Miller's wet dream call for the Insurrection Act. At first it was in insurrection for people in Portland because they were wearing inflatable frog suits and playing drums. Now they are calling for combat in Minnesota against white midwestern ladies.
If only the state and local governments would listen to the detainment requests so ICE doesn't have to go door to door. Yet you say, Trump is trying for conflict.
THE LEFT POLITICIANS ARE PURPOSEFULLY NOT DETAINING ILLEGAL CRIMINALS TO INITIATE CONFLICT FOR THIS INDENTED OUTCOME. THEY 100% WANT SOMEONE TO GET SHOT.
So dullards like you can make utterly moronic comments.
In other words, go pound sand.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:24 pm to Powerman
quote:
Is there any indication that they're trying to avoid the chaos?
Of course. They request that these sanctuary cities don’t ignore ICE detainers. You have the chaos creators backwards.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:48 pm to VOR
quote:
There was no legit reason for Trump and Miller to go in so “heavy”. They just want the chaos and political theater. I think it’s going to backfire in the end.
Do you think the Somali fraud situation is fake ?
Posted on 1/16/26 at 3:57 pm to geauxEdO
He needs to go scorched earth on EVERYTHING as if the country depends on it to survive because it does.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:07 pm to geauxEdO
One of the number one rules in politics is never become or feed into what your opponents paint you as.
I’m by no means against using the insurrection act but we must make sure we weight the consequences of it due to what I stated above vs benefit.
I’m by no means against using the insurrection act but we must make sure we weight the consequences of it due to what I stated above vs benefit.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 4:09 pm to TBoy
quote:
This is foolishness.
Your post if foolishness.
Popular
Back to top


0





