- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:05 pm to Seldom Seen
Kemp, along with his allies in China, laugh at Trump.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:06 pm to Seldom Seen
That’ll show em!!!!! We are well past strongly worded letters at this point. They aren’t scared of the conservatives anymore. They know nothing will be done to them.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:07 pm to Seldom Seen
I understand.
Kemp is scared.
Ratfricker is a corrupt a-hole.
These guys are going down.
Kemp is scared.
Ratfricker is a corrupt a-hole.
These guys are going down.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:15 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
These guys are going down.
Not sure if serious
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:17 pm to Donnie 9 inch
quote:
They aren’t scared of the conservatives anymore. They know nothing will be done to them.
This is truth
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:24 pm to Seldom Seen
Couple problems with this. First, of course, is whether it is true that chain of custody was broken and whether such violation makes the ballots improperly counted.
Second is that there is no way to know who those ballots were cast for. Once the ballots are accepted. They become anonymous. While it seems unlikely, it is possible the majority of those ballots were for Trump.
The only real remedy is to investigate, prosecute anyone who broke a law, and take steps to insure it doesn't happen next time.
Had the chain of custody issue been discovered in a timely fashion, then the voters who cast the rejected ballots still could have voted. There is no real remedy after the election is over.
Second is that there is no way to know who those ballots were cast for. Once the ballots are accepted. They become anonymous. While it seems unlikely, it is possible the majority of those ballots were for Trump.
The only real remedy is to investigate, prosecute anyone who broke a law, and take steps to insure it doesn't happen next time.
Had the chain of custody issue been discovered in a timely fashion, then the voters who cast the rejected ballots still could have voted. There is no real remedy after the election is over.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 1:34 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
Not sure if serious
Very serious.
They both will lose re-election next year.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 2:56 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
They both will lose re-election next year.
Raffy will lose the primary as he has a couple of good opponents.
Kemp will win his primary. Vernon Jones is his only competition and he is a Demorat who supported Trump and that is about it. He is still a Demorat policy wise.
But, with Kemp as the R nominee, many true conservatives in GA will not vote in the general and hand the guvnership to Stacey Abrams.
Not a good situation in GA right now.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:43 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
They both will lose re-election next year
I hope this is true. I won't vote for either one. Abrams is a better choice than Kemp. At least the GOP legislature will fight Abrams, when Kemp screws us, they all go along with it.
Posted on 9/17/21 at 3:55 pm to Dday63
quote:
Had the chain of custody issue been discovered in a timely fashion, then the voters who cast the rejected ballots still could have voted. There is no real remedy after the election is over.
That was kind of the intent though, wasn’t it?
People were screaming about the chain of custody concerns when widespread mail in voting was first rolled out but were told there was no proof since nothing had happened yet.
People were screaming concerns on Election Night and Fulton County was all “We can’t deal with that right now, the whole place is flooding and all you election officials need to leave!”
After the fact, people are still screaming and you want to talk about “had the chain of custody issues been discovered in a timely fashion?”
So we can’t address it before the election because the harm hasn’t occurred yet but we can’t address it now because “there is no real remedy after the election is over?”
That seems awfully convenient.
Popular
Back to top


7










