- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:37 pm to boosiebadazz
I know!! Don’t you just hate it when just as soon as you so proudly and braggadociously put your guy up in that pedestal, but along comes that little bitch arse karen boy, so excited and proud to have come up with a complaint that shits all over your guy? And against all odds actually has a legitimate complaint at that.
I feel yall’s pain on that. Believe me. frick a little bitch arse Karen boy and his snotty, whiny complaint. That he’s so proud of.
That’s a parable.
**Oh and you’re just hoping your only retort is correct and accurate, because what else do you have?? But unfortunately that shot in the dark is wrong. I would say though that any thoughts I would have had in the past about Trump in a similar situation, if y’all had any sense, would be exactly what a rational and logical person would propose in order to explain the matter with Desantis.
I feel yall’s pain on that. Believe me. frick a little bitch arse Karen boy and his snotty, whiny complaint. That he’s so proud of.
That’s a parable.
**Oh and you’re just hoping your only retort is correct and accurate, because what else do you have?? But unfortunately that shot in the dark is wrong. I would say though that any thoughts I would have had in the past about Trump in a similar situation, if y’all had any sense, would be exactly what a rational and logical person would propose in order to explain the matter with Desantis.
This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:44 pm to PorkSammich
Trump finally picked a great candidate. Should've been Jordan after ballot #3 last time
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:46 pm to davyjones
You have got to be on the spectrum.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:07 pm to boosiebadazz
That’s the thanks I get for going the extra mile to spell it out fully so hopefully you’re able to better understand a post? I deserve an award for that. Helping people help themselves. Like special olympics for message board forums.
I kid.
But frick you for your mean comment that apparently you weren’t kidding about like I was here.
I kid.
But frick you for your mean comment that apparently you weren’t kidding about like I was here.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:09 pm to boosiebadazz
I’d hate to lose Jordan from his committee assignments. But he is probably the best person for the job.
I am giving him my endorsement as well.
I am giving him my endorsement as well.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:12 pm to Rebel
He’s shown swamp tendencies. I can’t wait to see what he does when he has all the power and all the lobbyist money is thrown his way.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:13 pm to BugAC
quote:
Gumbro is so confused now
Waiting to see how that Cult45 moniker fits with Trump supporters like me.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:22 pm to PorkSammich
Matt will put the same rules on JJ as he did McCarthy.
He has outlined the three principles: 1. Policy, 2. Personnel and 3. Procedure.
One and Two are very easy. JJ is going to have a lot of push back from the GOP establishment on procedure. Specially single subject appropriation bills with the ability to amend, debate and vote.
The establishment HATES single subject appropriation bills because it exposes them and makes them make a case for spending bills that most of the time voters do not support. They love hiding behind the veil of continuing resolutions.
He has outlined the three principles: 1. Policy, 2. Personnel and 3. Procedure.
One and Two are very easy. JJ is going to have a lot of push back from the GOP establishment on procedure. Specially single subject appropriation bills with the ability to amend, debate and vote.
The establishment HATES single subject appropriation bills because it exposes them and makes them make a case for spending bills that most of the time voters do not support. They love hiding behind the veil of continuing resolutions.
This post was edited on 10/5/23 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:32 pm to PorkSammich
quote:
would have been nice if he did that originally instead of getting the Swamp Dem McCarthy the Speakership
Lol wut???
Jim Jordan endorsed McCarthy for Speaker. You wanted Trump to back someone who said he was not going to be the Speaker?
CNN, don't click
quote:
Jordan, in an effort to show party unity, nominated GOP leader Kevin McCarthy in the second round of voting. Speaking on the House floor Tuesday, Jordan said the differences among Republican lawmakers “pale in comparison” to the differences between Republicans and Democrats.
“We need to rally around him,” Jordan said of McCarthy.
quote:
Leaving the floor, Jordan told CNN there is “no” chance he will become speaker, adding he wants to be House Judiciary chairman. He said he would lobby his colleagues to back McCarthy once the chamber resumes Wednesday.
Are you willing to post the most dumbass and incorrect shite just to try and make Trump look bad, or you're actually a massive assclown?
Posted on 10/5/23 at 10:34 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
I agree, Rob being the biggest example.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 1:21 am to Padme
No he’s not. Jordan didn’t have the political capital in January—he may not even have enough now.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 1:38 am to BugAC
quote:
Gumbro is so confused now
Can't wait to see the inevitable pivot
Posted on 10/6/23 at 1:49 am to Powerman
You are now entering the spin zone.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 1:59 am to Pendulum
quote:
You are now entering the spin zone.
How so? It's pretty clear that GP wanted no part of Jim being speaker
Trump has no endorsed him and he hasn't really stated his approval one way or another
If he says anything other than what his position was literally a day ago then he's a loon. I'll give him a chance to state his position.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 6:02 am to Powerman
What if...
Jim supports McCarthy, Trump supports McCarthy at the same time. Hmmm.
Now the gig is over for McCarthy and now Jim is ready to take over. Perhaps something needed to be done before Jim or another MAGA style congressman was ready to take over. Just a wild hunch that the folks that care needed to see one last stupid move by RINOs to get the public on their side. But either way, arguing over who supported who first in a political arena seems short-sighted.
Jim supports McCarthy, Trump supports McCarthy at the same time. Hmmm.
Now the gig is over for McCarthy and now Jim is ready to take over. Perhaps something needed to be done before Jim or another MAGA style congressman was ready to take over. Just a wild hunch that the folks that care needed to see one last stupid move by RINOs to get the public on their side. But either way, arguing over who supported who first in a political arena seems short-sighted.
Posted on 10/6/23 at 12:00 pm to mjfrog93
quote:
Perhaps something needed to be done before Jim or another MAGA style congressman was ready to take over. Just a wild hunch that the folks that care needed to see one last stupid move by RINOs to get the public on their side.
The public isn't on the "MAGA" side
Posted on 10/6/23 at 12:16 pm to PorkSammich
Dems endorse this too.

Posted on 10/6/23 at 12:17 pm to Powerman
quote:
But presumably you disagree with Trump's endorsement here correct?
I would rather Trump himself or Gaetz as speaker.
With that said Scalise is probably the best choice from a practical/political POV.
Popular
Back to top



0










