- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TRUMP FULLY ACQUITTED
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:38 pm to cajunangelle
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:38 pm to cajunangelle
Yep, the unraveling seen here is boiling the dems motive for this down to impeachment as a strategy for defeating Trump in an election they don't think they can win.
In an effort to not seek new and pertinent information, but rather to simply give the managers carte blanche on unchallenged rebutall, the dem senators are the catalyst.
In an effort to not seek new and pertinent information, but rather to simply give the managers carte blanche on unchallenged rebutall, the dem senators are the catalyst.
1
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:39 pm to TigerBait1971
This is fricking ridiculous... getting nowhere fast
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:39 pm to GRTiger
Are they allowed to respond to a previous question? This doesn't seem germane to the question asked.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:40 pm to Lsut81
schitt for brains should just record one answer and it would save lots of time
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:40 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Are they allowed to respond to a previous question?
The other side can submit a question so their side can respond. It has happened a few times already.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:41 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Are they allowed to respond to a previous question? This doesn't seem germane to the question asked.
You surprised at Schiff doing that....
Besides, half the Dems questions are basically "Can you argue what the President's counsel just said, k thanks"
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:41 pm to HubbaBubba
Schiff nervously rambling and still hasn't answered the question.
Oh wait he is saying you must remove Trump to protect the country and the election.
He is a nutcase but CNN is probably delighted in joy.
Oh wait he is saying you must remove Trump to protect the country and the election.
He is a nutcase but CNN is probably delighted in joy.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:42 pm to TigerCoon
quote:
The other side can submit a question so their side can respond. It has happened a few times already.
I must have missed the part of the question where he was asked to respond to the previous response. All I heard was the part about asking if impeachment should have been ignored because of the election. Thanks.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:43 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
I must have missed the part of the question where he was asked to respond to the previous response. All I heard was the part about asking if impeachment should have been ignored because of the election. Thanks.
Oh, Schiff feels in no way bound to the question when he is framing his response. He just keeps to the talking points.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:43 pm to MFn GIMP
Can anyone in definite terms explain when this shite is supposed to be finished and a vote occurs?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:43 pm to TigerCoon
quote:
Oh, Schiff feels in no way bound to the question when he is framing his response. He just keeps to the talking points.
That makes sense.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:44 pm to IT_Dawg
wow. Schiff basically saying Trump is a Putin agent.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:44 pm to JumpingTheShark
16 hrs. in total...8 hrs. today and another 8 tomorrow.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:45 pm to TigerCoon
quote:
Oh, Schiff feels in no way bound to the question when he is framing his response. He just keeps to the talking points.
He hasn't answered a question yet that was on point. Same spiel every time he stands up...
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:45 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Can anyone in definite terms explain when this shite is supposed to be finished and a vote occurs?
Questions today and tomorrow, 4 hours of debate on witnesses and then a vote on witnesses on Friday....who the frick knows from there.
If they vote against witnesses, probably vote on Saturday for acquittal. If vote for witnesses, it could be a few weeks or it could be a couple months depending on the number of witnesses and how long it takes them
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:45 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
That makes sense.
I have been waiting for Roberts to pounce on somebody for grandstanding. Not gonna happen, I guess.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:47 pm to JumpingTheShark
quote:
Can anyone in definite terms explain when this shite is supposed to be finished and a vote occurs?
Would be a great question for a senator to ask right now.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:47 pm to Big Chipper
I’m out. This isn’t interesting.
It’s like arguing religion with someone who holds opposite views from you...it’s just listening to yourself breathe loudly.
It’s like arguing religion with someone who holds opposite views from you...it’s just listening to yourself breathe loudly.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:48 pm to TigerCoon
Philbin is rocking it again.
"If you vote for witnesses because the House didn't want to do their job, we are going to call a long list of witnesses and will impede you getting the job done in the Senate."
frick YOU HOUSE MANAGERS
"If you vote for witnesses because the House didn't want to do their job, we are going to call a long list of witnesses and will impede you getting the job done in the Senate."
frick YOU HOUSE MANAGERS
Posted on 1/29/20 at 1:49 pm to Gaston
quote:
I’m out. This isn’t interesting.
I was just thinking this, but the potential FOMO on some random boom or bombshell is too much to handle.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 1:50 pm
Page 69 of 214
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News