
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump expresses concern about midterms in Texas, pushes for Paxton in tight Senate
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:18 am to SlowFlowPro
Deboar has proven to be a YUGE proponent of welfare
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That money should go towards working on the deficit/debt
Or drones. Sweet drones.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:29 am to NIH
quote:
Welfare is how we win
We're at the "this is why it's a good thing" with Trump's leftist economics that I've been posting about since 2016
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:29 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Bbonds, deboar, Sdv and Davy word salad should go tell the President nothing to worry about. They have assured us there is nothing to worry about. Literally no chance Paxton loses.
Rent free. And yes…Paxton will win. Easily.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:31 am to idlewatcher
quote:
The guy who gave a pedophile a free pass
Talarico and the useful idiots eat this up. There were HUGE procedural issues in that case. And I love how the Takarico add says the guy was “connected to some of Paxtons rich friends.” Don’t be a useful idiot.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So feel free to criticize Trump
Will do. No fricking chance Paxton loses.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:33 am to Powerman
quote:
Needing to do this for a Texas senate race is what makes it worthy of observation That's a layup for an NBA power forward. It shouldn't require this level of attention. Yet here we are.
Same thing happened last time. Texas is always going blue to the dummies.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 8:33 am to BBONDS25
The same Paxton that took a $250k donation from Cody Campbell and meddled the next day in the Sorsby case on behalf of the state of Texas would never
Posted on 10/4/26 at 9:45 am to BeeFense5
Trump is a panican! I bet he voted for himself three times!
Posted on 10/4/26 at 9:50 am to NIH
quote:
The same Paxton that took a $250k donation from Cody Campbell and meddled the next day in the Sorsby case on behalf of the state of Texas would never
What did the courts say about Sorsby? Was Paxtons letter legally accurate? What happened on June 8th? If a judge said Sorsby could play on June 8th and on June 10th the NCAA defied the Judges order, how long should Paxton have waited to write a letter informing them of the illegality of ignoring the judges order?
You’re too smart to be an NPC. Do your research.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 9:56 am to BBONDS25
Yeah the donation had nothing to do with Paxton’s involvement 
Posted on 10/4/26 at 10:00 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Yeah the donation had nothing to do with Paxton’s involvement
You might not be able to legally prove a direct connection but it isn't a huge logical leap to think that there was a connection.
You'd be naive at best if you didn't at least suspect it.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:53 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Yeah the donation had nothing to do with Paxton’s involvement
Again. You’re an NPC. Judge ruled the 8th. NCAA violated the ruling the 10th. Paxtons sent a letter the 11th.
Don’t be a useful idiot. Plenty to complain about Paxton. That letter isn’t one of them.
Of course…you didn’t know the timeline. You just knew what CNN told you.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:54 am to BBONDS25
That was a sham court ruling on an issue the AG should’ve never got involved with. Both Sorsby and the university had representation. Paxton threw his weight around as soon as the $ was right. Even Tech realized it was such a loser that the school dropped it.
When did you become such a party line hack?
When did you become such a party line hack?
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 11:58 am
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:58 am to NIH
quote:
That was a sham court ruling on an issue the AG should’ve never got involved with. Even Tech realized it was such a loser that the school dropped it.
Wrong. Again you don’t know the facts. Court ruled in the merits. NCAA ignored the ruling, then the state AG wrote a letter supporting the ruling for a college in his state.
THEN… Sorsby declared for the supplemental draft rendering the whole thing moot. And the AG wasn’t a party to the suit.
quote:
When did you become such a party line hack?
Typical liberal projection. I educate you on the facts and you call me a hack.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 11:58 am to BBONDS25
You haven’t cited a single fact.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:00 pm to NIH
quote:
You haven’t cited a single fact.
Be specific. What have I posted that you object to factually?
Guarantee you don’t respond with anything substantive.
Tacit admission.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:00 pm to NIH
quote:
The same Paxton that took a $250k donation from Cody Campbell and meddled the next day in the Sorsby case on behalf of the state of Texas would never

Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:02 pm to BBONDS25
Everything you typed
Paxton’s letter
He threatened the NCAA in exchange for a donation
Paxton’s letter
He threatened the NCAA in exchange for a donation
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:03 pm

Popular
Back to top



1










