
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump expresses concern about midterms in Texas, pushes for Paxton in tight Senate
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:03 pm to NIH
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:03 pm to NIH
quote:
Be specific. What have I posted that you object to factually? Guarantee you don’t respond with anything substantive. Tacit admission.
quote:
Everything you typed
In case you don’t get the reference. You proved my point. You don’t have the capacity to contest a single fact I posted. In fact, the letter you linked supports what I said.
In reality, you’re an NPC that couldn’t care less about facts. You rely on speculation and innuendo. Facts destroy you. I destroyed you.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:05 pm to BBONDS25
I’ll take that as you admitting you’re wrong
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:08 pm to NIH
quote:
I’ll take that as you admitting you’re wrong
Ive debated a self proclaimed victor in spite of all evidence to the contrary. His name was Rex. You are no Rex.
I posted facts:
June 8th: court rules he can play.
June 10: NCAA violates order and says he can’t play.
June 11: Paxton writes a letter (thank you for linking it) warning the NCAA of the potential legal and financial disadvantages of ignoring the ruling.
I post the FACTS. Your response:
Nuh uh. I win. Emoticon.
You dumb frick.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:11 pm to BeeFense5
He’s getting really emotional about Texans not liking their choices for Senator.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:12 pm to BeeFense5
How? What about what I posted do you object to? Look. I don’t think Paxton is a good candidate. However, you idiots ignoring facts I’ve posted and opting for ad hominem should make you ashamed. Say something substantive. Ignore me. Address the facts I’ve posted.
You won’t.
You won’t.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:12 pm to NIH
quote:
He’s getting really emotional about Texans not liking their choices for Senator.
Another attack on me devoid of addressing the facts I posted. Says a lot about you.
Address the timeline. Clearly you were ignorant to what actually happened.
Posting facts isn’t emotional. More typical liberal projection from you half wits.
Oh. And Paxton will win. Despite your hope for the DSA candidate.
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:19 pm to NIH
quote:
You’re projecting
We all can see you running from the facts and posting your NPC bullshite. You’re not smart enough to dispute the timeline. Because it’s the timeline.
You opined with hubris from a place of complete ignorance. No biggie. That’s what NPCs do.
I look forward to your response that is devoid of any argument or fact and just pathetically attacks me.
We all see it.
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:21 pm to BBONDS25
BBONDS:
“Nuh uh”
“Debate my facts”
You’re a hoot
“Nuh uh”
“Debate my facts”
You’re a hoot
This post was edited on 10/4/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 10/4/26 at 12:23 pm to NIH
quote:
I look forward to your response that is devoid of any argument or fact and just pathetically attacks me.
quote:
BBONDS: “Nuh uh” “Debate my facts” You’re a hoot

Popular
Back to top

1









