- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump calls for investigation into Ann Selzer
Posted on 11/18/24 at 10:47 am to stout
Posted on 11/18/24 at 10:47 am to stout
quote:
No doubt she was paid
Maybe.
Some of these people are zealots though.
A crazy woman so mad about abortion that she’d do something like this for free isn’t out if the realm of possibility.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 10:53 am to moneyg
Every pollster is paid they get a contract to do a poll the organization paying for the poll has requests for what they want the parameters and the costs and when the results are expected
and within a range of accuracy
There's absolutely no guarantee that the poll is correct
none
and within a range of accuracy
There's absolutely no guarantee that the poll is correct
none
Posted on 11/18/24 at 10:55 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
LegalEazyE
Still waiting for your acceptance of my terms if you work on elections in Louisiana they're over
so you can't be doing anything important right now
oh I see Wisconsin, So tell me when you want to have the debate
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 10:58 am
Posted on 11/18/24 at 11:00 am to OWLFAN86
maybe this will help you
LINK
hint
Look at the interstate commerce clause to try to find something there
it's the conduction of business with the intent of interfering with an election so it doesn't apply to government or elected it has to do with private transactions which this would fall under
If you can find the law that you are alleging that she broke it would make your argument a little easier
LINK
hint
Look at the interstate commerce clause to try to find something there
it's the conduction of business with the intent of interfering with an election so it doesn't apply to government or elected it has to do with private transactions which this would fall under
If you can find the law that you are alleging that she broke it would make your argument a little easier
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 11:05 am
Posted on 11/18/24 at 11:16 am to LegalEazyE
quote:
Dumb arse. Remember the 51 intelligence officials who knowingly lied and issued a public statement published in tons of mainstream media outlets days before the election claiming that Hunter's laptop was "Russian disinformation." What they did, the knowingly false statements and information they made that it was proven to have suppressed the vote for Trump... That was prosecutable level election interference. This is no fricking different, really.
quote:
I work in politics, lobbying, government affairs, policy, campaigns...
Someone pays you for these takes?
Posted on 11/18/24 at 11:35 am to Decatur
Almost an hour since I issued my debate challenge
and I'm about to head to lunch he has yet to respond but he is posting on the board
I mean he could become a board hero i've been such an obnoxious a-hole about my opinions and knowledge in politics over the past few months why not take a puncher's chance
I'm the self-declared expert and here's his chance to out expert me
bedpan will probably blow him if he won
and I'm about to head to lunch he has yet to respond but he is posting on the board
I mean he could become a board hero i've been such an obnoxious a-hole about my opinions and knowledge in politics over the past few months why not take a puncher's chance
I'm the self-declared expert and here's his chance to out expert me
bedpan will probably blow him if he won
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:20 pm to deltaland
quote:
Her punishment is she lost all credibility
Then it will happen again in 2028.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:23 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Almost an hour since I issued my debate challenge
and I'm about to head to lunch he has yet to respond but he is posting on the board
Who the frick are you? I don't care enough about you to accept your lame "debate challenge." I've already said what I need to say in the comments here. And you're a fricking retard who is simply wrong. What good is further debating with you going to do when you can't even admit you're wrong re: there being a HUGE difference between simply being "wrong"/mistaken or finessing a poll a little bit... and being an "independent pollster," who (was most likely) paid to outright lie by a Presidential candidate and publishing your 100% lie of a poll in a state's largest newspaper days before an election with the intent to suppress the vote of one candidate by making that candidates supporters think they already lost? If the pollster didn't do anything wrong and simply made a boo boo whoopsy mistake in one poll, why the frick is she retiring and not polling anymore. shite happens, right? Just a little mistake or a little finessing. No big deal, right?
fricking nerd.
This post was edited on 11/18/24 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:37 pm to LegalEazyE
You’re a complete fricking imbecile if you think Ann Selzer has broken any laws by conducting a poll and publishing the results.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:38 pm to Decatur
Rexcatur sounds like an angry little proggy today! 
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:39 pm to Harry Ballz 2024
quote:
How about the entire polling apparatus?
All we heard was this race was too close the call and Harris has the edge
Worthless
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:41 pm to BurlesonCountyAg
Treat her just like they did Jan 6 people
Posted on 11/18/24 at 1:45 pm to John Barron
No doubt she was being dishonest in her poll, but i think it backfired. She just forced the MAGAs in Iowa to think their votes were needed.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 2:03 pm to LegalEazyE
You're the one that bragged about being such an expert in politics and public policy and elections and all that
So am I
let's see who has the bigger dick
'cause that's all this message board bullshite is a dick-measuring contest I'm just not afraid to show mine
but I guess you just got out of the pool
So am I
let's see who has the bigger dick
'cause that's all this message board bullshite is a dick-measuring contest I'm just not afraid to show mine
but I guess you just got out of the pool
Posted on 11/18/24 at 2:22 pm to Stagg8
quote:
If that’s the case… why do we care, again?
I care.
The intent was certainly to impact the election. Just because it didn’t doesn’t mean it’s not important.
The shooter in PA missed Trump. Should I not care?
It appears that this lady manipulated a poll in an attempt to influence opinion. If that’s true, I want to know about it.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 5:04 pm to Decatur
quote:
You’re a complete fricking imbecile if you think Ann Selzer has broken any laws by conducting a poll and publishing the results.
K.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 5:06 pm to purple18
quote:
Treat her just like they did Jan 6 people
Or treat her the way they did Douglass Mackey.
Posted on 11/18/24 at 5:13 pm to OWLFAN86
Dude, are your for real? How much of a fricking loser are you that you are taking back and forth debate on a message board and now talking about showing dicks... and taking it to an outside debate. fricking f a g g o t.
I don't give a frick about you. I don't care enough to engage you for more than a few comments here. I've already said what I had to say and voiced my opinion of her actions and what her behavior might add up to. And you are acting is though, oh. She just did a poll and got it wrong. No big deal... when everyone knows there is much more to the story than that. So does she, which is why she retired. Cool. You disagree. We disagree.
I'm happy for you you are such a stalwart, legend and oracle in politics, government relations, campaigns, polls etc. Great! Good for you. Now frick off.
I don't give a frick about you. I don't care enough to engage you for more than a few comments here. I've already said what I had to say and voiced my opinion of her actions and what her behavior might add up to. And you are acting is though, oh. She just did a poll and got it wrong. No big deal... when everyone knows there is much more to the story than that. So does she, which is why she retired. Cool. You disagree. We disagree.
I'm happy for you you are such a stalwart, legend and oracle in politics, government relations, campaigns, polls etc. Great! Good for you. Now frick off.
Popular
Back to top


1






