Started By
Message

re: Trudeau Announces Total Freeze On Handgun Ownership, Mandatory Buyback Of Assault Weapons

Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:38 am to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Trudeau Announces Total Freeze On Handgun Ownership, Mandatory Buyback Of Assault Weapon
Does that apply to Trudeau's security team?
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
7644 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:38 am to
Fidel's bastard son strikes again
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Boy, I love that it annoys you people enough that you keep bringing it up.



You losers and your virtue signaling is hilarious.
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:46 am to
quote:

You losers and your virtue signaling is hilarious.


Where... where am I virtue signalling?

I don't give a damn about trans rights or whatever nonsense or certain thing is racist.

Posted by swamplynx
Lake Chuck
Member since Oct 2014
1275 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:47 am to
Doesn't the Heller decision make this unconstitutional if a bill like this was introduced here?
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34223 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

If I understand it, a bolt action takes more time to fire shots than a fully automatic weapon. They do determine how lethal something is in a mass shooting because timing is everything.


I'm pretty sure the purchase/ownership of fully automatic weapons are already severely restricted (if not outright banned in some instances). A semi-automatic AR-15 will cycle a round just as quickly (more or less) as a semi-automatic 20 gauge shotgun. Or even a .22 handgun.

In terms of ballistics, the round used in an AR-15 (.223 caliber) is LESS "powerful" than many common semi-auto rifles.

So is the argument an "assault-rife" ONLY a fully automatic rifle? If so, there really isn't any need for stringent rules regarding sale and ownership. Those are already in place.

Or is the argument that all "semi-auto" firearms "assault rifles"? If so, that would have to include most .308 handguns; many 20 gauge shotguns; as well as many common "hunting rifles".

In fact, these two rifles shoot the EXACT same round. Neither is fully automatic.





If we want to talk "gun control" in the wake of a horrible tragedy, that's fine. But let's at least define what one side of the argument wants to ban
Posted by sugarbuzz
Badstreet USA
Member since May 2022
377 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Definitions are whatever society wants them to be.


Wrong....try again.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
58017 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:55 am to
Canada already experiences less crime than the US, a lot of that is due to a high level of cultural homogeneity. If this passes, it will work to make their low violent crime rates even lower.

The problem is the US is so incredibly non-homogenous that our media pretty much demands the celebration of any group which deviates from the general norm, the further a group is from that center the more we're pushed to celebrate them. If one of these groups commits a disproportionally large amount of violent crimes though, that is generally ignored and not discussed (because that makes it harder to push the celebration = acceptance narrative).

So if the legislation passes and shows gains in Canada, the Left will clamor for it here, using Canada as their shining example while purposely ignoring that comparing us on this topic is like comparing apples and helicopters.
Posted by 93and99
Dayton , Oh / Allentown , Pa
Member since Dec 2018
14400 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Where... where am I virtue signalling?



You choose to vote for them.

You are one of them.
Posted by Fat Bastard
2024 NFL pick'em champion
Member since Mar 2009
89471 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 8:57 am to
and all this mass shooting stuff has done nothing like suicides and black on black crime with guns.

but media does not care about that.

does not fit narrative
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5727 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:00 am to
Just a reminder that school shootings are just an excuse. Even in their absence the left still wants to confiscate your guns.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39873 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Definitions are whatever society wants them to be.


Just like the definition of a vaccine?

You must like to ruled over like a peasant. Because that’s where all this leads. Why are you so eager to give up freedom?
Posted by LSURulzSEC
Lake Charles via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
79292 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:04 am to
Before long Canada will be like the UK and having knife buybacks to stop knife violence...
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108317 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:13 am to
quote:

When they regulate assault rifles, you guys complain because 'handguns are the ones used in most homicides.'

When they regulate handguns, you guys still complain even though handguns are the ones used in most homicides.




That's blatantly false kid.

When you on the left call for banning or "regulating" as you put it, we oppose it because it's an infringement of our constitutional rights as Americans. It doesn't matter what caliber or type of gun.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
57299 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 9:34 am to
quote:

Boy, I love that it annoys you people enough that you keep bringing it up.


What a mature outlook. Typical.
Posted by Kingshakabooboo
Member since Nov 2012
1535 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Definitions are whatever society wants them to be. If enough people associate 'assault rifles' with a particular thing, that becomes their definition.


So if enough Tigerdroppings members define you as a dumb arse then you are in fact a dumb arse?

Go ahead and ban all guns. If you don’t address the actual causes that lead to these mass killing events they will continue. Just by other means. Most likely improvised explosives like at the Boston Marathon. It’s not a gun problem.
Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Just like the definition of a vaccine?


The definition of a vaccine has never changed.

Immunity against a disease or severe symptoms of a disease.

Posted by DiscountedCashFlow
Member since May 2022
243 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

So if enough Tigerdroppings members define you as a dumb arse then you are in fact a dumb arse?


I forgot where TigerDroppings is the same as society rather than a tiny percentage of a 330M population society.

quote:

Definitions are whatever society wants them to be. If enough people associate 'assault rifles' with a particular thing, that becomes their definition.
This post was edited on 5/31/22 at 12:36 pm
Posted by Bow08tie
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2011
4535 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 12:39 pm to
Y'all do see the one country at a time here method?

The U.S. is in the sites.
Posted by Chief One Word
Eastern Washington State
Member since Mar 2018
4254 posts
Posted on 5/31/22 at 12:43 pm to
I hope Canadians have leaky boats that can easily sink at any time.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram