0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/12/26 at 11:59 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Saw her a few years back now. She's a very small woman. She was playing a Gibson SJ-200 Super Jumbo and the guitar looked like it weighed more than she does.
It was a good show though.
awesome
didn't realize how many of her songs i knew
she has some chops
Posted on 11/13/26 at 7:33 am to wackatimesthree
quote:You have no idea how many votes each case deals with. Could be one, could be thousands. And hey, how 'bout we still prosecute crimes, whattaya say?
It would take between 3-4 orders of magnitude more cases
quote:In my analogy, if you're catching a few, there are a lot more you're not seeing.
In your analogy
No one's saying we should overturn the election based on these cases, dumbfrick, but to say this is just normal levels of cheating so we should just forget about it is some real useless pussy shite. Typical.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 7:42 am
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:12 am to BoarEd
All from 2020 correct?
I want to know if something was going on in 2026.
I want to know if something was going on in 2026.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:17 am to jb4
quote:
So that’s why he moved to a military base
I believe Iran put a hit out on him.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:36 am to BoarEd
quote:
Todd Blanche Announces Hundreds of Voter Fraud Investigations
Only two years too late.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:37 am to lsusteve1
quote:
So
A little fraud is ok
What a silly comment
No fraud is OK
A little not-OK fraud won't have any impact on this election.
A few hundred votes wouldn't have swung a local judge's race here
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:41 am to BoarEd
H
U
N
D
R
E
D
S
U
N
D
R
E
D
S
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:42 am to blueboy
quote:
In my analogy, if you're catching a few, there are a lot more you're not seeing.
Says who? What logical principle necessitates that to be the case?
That's actually a common logical fallacy.
Specifically known as a Hasty Generalization, aka a Faulty Generalization, aka an Overgeneralization, aka an Argument From Small Numbers.
The example usually given is someone rolls into a town they've never been in before and the first 2-3 people they encounter are rude to them. So they confidently conclude that everyone in that town is rude.
It doesn't follow at all that that is the case.
quote:
You have no idea how many votes each case deals with. Could be one, could be thousands.
Now that is a valid point. You got me on that one. Of course, there would still have to be so many of them to move the needle in the actual election that it's still pretty much impossible—remember, over 90% of the counties in the country shifted blue...so these cheaters would have to be spread out over virtually all of them. Not pockets of them in strategic places...all of them.
quote:
And hey, how 'bout we still prosecute crimes, whattaya say?
Nobody said otherwise. The discussion was never about whether to prosecute or not. It was about whether it's feasible that this election was "stolen" or not.
quote:
No one's saying we should overturn the election based on these cases, dumbfrick
Ahhh, yes they are. And I think you were typing that looking into a mirror.
quote:
but to say this is just normal levels of cheating so we should just forget about it.
I see where you were confused. THIS is the thing that nobody is actually saying. Other than you, I mean.
Try writing it out next time before posting it. I've seen that help dumb people keep things straight and not get them confused before.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 11/13/26 at 8:50 am to wackatimesthree
quote:So, that's it? We got 'em all? And those 5 fleas, that was all of them? What luck.
That's actually a common logical fallacy.
quote:Meeting several rude people in rapid succession upon first contact with a community is a much stronger indicator that it's a pattern and not that you just so happened to meet all or most of the rude people in the community just after contact. Sure, it's possible, but it's not usually the case.
The example usually given is someone rolls into a town they've never been in before and the first 2-3 people they encounter are rude to them. So they confidently conclude that everyone in that town is rude.
Anyway, it's been a week and a half. I doubt these 300 cases are all there is or will be.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:06 am to BoarEd
When are they going in handcuffs? By the time anyone is arrested it will be too late.. again.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Hundreds ain't gonna do it
Let's not forget that the Left told us for years, as did you, that voter fraud was ZERO.
Where are the goalposts moving now that the RIght has proven it happens?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:13 am to SundayFunday
quote:
quote:
VOR
Who let you back inside?
His boyfriend/dungeon master
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:15 am to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
quote:
i'd be honored to have an iced t anytime
Should you ever find yourself in Shreveport-Bossier or around Natchez, Ms. just light up the Zap Signal
We have a love connection on the poli board, pals! Congats you two.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:17 am to blueboy
quote:
In my analogy, if you're catching a few, there are a lot more you're not seeing.
Bingo. This shite isn't even the tip of the the tip of the iceburg. But it's something. At least someone is trying to do something about it.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What a silly comment
No fraud is OK
You don't believe that. Just STFU.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:19 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
You don't believe that.
What?
Sounds like you're believing a strawman over reality again
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:22 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
We have a love connection on the poli board, pals! Congats you two.
On this board we believe everyone is illegal, no land is stolen, all love is miserable, and the best option for LSU’s QB is never the current starter
Posted on 11/13/26 at 9:24 am to blueboy
quote:
Meeting several rude people in rapid succession upon first contact with a community is a much stronger indicator that it's a pattern and not that you just so happened to meet all or most of the rude people in the community just after contact.
No, it's not. Factually. That's not my opinion, it's a fact.
That's why there's a named and categorized logical fallacy for that reasoning.
It's like pulling a ball blindfolded out of a tank that contains 1000 balls that are either white or black. You pull 5 balls out and they are all black, so you conclude that there must be more black balls in the tank than white.
But there's no basis for that conclusion when you're talking about a sample size of .5% of the total. If there are 500 white and 500 black balls in the tank, you have a 50% chance of pulling one or the other every time you draw.
That's why I provided the math I provided (well, one reason), because the sample size we're talking about is much, much smaller than the example I gave.
Now, the odds are 1 in 32 that you would pull five black balls out in a row (assuming you put the ones you draw back in before the next draw) 1 in 2, then 1 in 4, 1 in 8, one in 16, 1 in 32.
But here's what we don't know. We don't know how many times they had to draw a ball out of the tank so to speak before pulling out a white one (a valid case of cheating). I'm guessing hundreds.
And again, this is not about prosecution, it's about the claims by people who obviously have no understanding of statistics claiming that this election is a statistical outlier and that proves that there was election fraud.
First of all, it's NOT a statistical outlier. The same thing happened in 2016 and 2024 going the other way for Trump.
A true statistical outlier would be that certain strategic swing counties were significantly shifted while other counties weren't.
An across the board, nationwide shift is something we've seen as recently as 24 months ago. Artificially shifting it would ostensibly require complicit actors in about 3,000 counties or around 100,000 polling centers.
The volume required to shift 90% of the counties in the US artificially makes it a non-starter.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News