- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tina Peters data- 29k election records deleted or altered…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:05 pm to mwade91383
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:05 pm to mwade91383
quote:
Tina Peters isn’t going anywhere. We both know that. What’s the point of pretending you don’t know why, how does that help you?
So, on the record, you’re fine with a whistleblower going to prison for exposing election fraud?
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:12 pm to Placekicker
Tina Peters didn’t do that so it’s kind of a silly question.
It’s becoming clear you actually don't know anything about her case, the charges, the evidence, or much of really anything besides the buzzwords.
Is there some other whistleblower you’re thinking of?
It’s becoming clear you actually don't know anything about her case, the charges, the evidence, or much of really anything besides the buzzwords.
Is there some other whistleblower you’re thinking of?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:17 pm to mwade91383
Whistleblower jailed for exposing Democrat election fraud in Colorado to the tune of 29k votes deleted or moved. SFP, Beaux, and MWade…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:17 pm to mwade91383
quote:
It’s becoming clear you actually don't know anything about her case, the charges, the evidence, or much of really anything besides the buzzwords.
Just like the recent stories about the 2020 election in GA
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which principle?
I suspect you know but just in case . . .
The principle that a worker can report suspected misconduct without fear of retaliation.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted by SlowFlowPro 12/22/25 at 7:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Shut the frick up, man.
I think that you're ignorant of what that story is about. You realize there's 315,000 votes were legitimate votes from voters, right? Let's just establish that you understand that first.
They were not fraudulent votes in the sense that they were cast by ineligible, voters or other illegalities. You realize this right?
Sorry slow flow. The votes are/were ineligible bc the chain of custody was not followed. No way to verify they are legal makes them ineligible to be counted. Which makes them illegal. Wrong again!
quote:
Shut the frick up, man.
I think that you're ignorant of what that story is about. You realize there's 315,000 votes were legitimate votes from voters, right? Let's just establish that you understand that first.
They were not fraudulent votes in the sense that they were cast by ineligible, voters or other illegalities. You realize this right?
Sorry slow flow. The votes are/were ineligible bc the chain of custody was not followed. No way to verify they are legal makes them ineligible to be counted. Which makes them illegal. Wrong again!
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:24 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
The principle that a worker can report suspected misconduct without fear of retaliation.
I answered that earlier
It's to prevent vigilante retardism like the Tina Peters story. The stupidity of her actions is a pretty poignant example as to why there are rules.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:25 pm to whereishobson
quote:
Posted by SlowFlowPro 12/22/25 at 7:10 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Shut the frick up, man.
I think that you're ignorant of what that story is about. You realize there's 315,000 votes were legitimate votes from voters, right? Let's just establish that you understand that first.
They were not fraudulent votes in the sense that they were cast by ineligible, voters or other illegalities. You realize this right?
Sorry slow flow. The votes are/were ineligible bc the chain of custody was not followed. No way to verify they are legal makes them ineligible to be counted. Which makes them illegal. Wrong again !!
In every swing state precinct where a challenge to the 2020 GE was made the judges denied those challenging the election access to the ballots to check chain of custody because they knew what they would find.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:25 pm to whereishobson
quote:
bc the chain of custody was not followed. No way to verify they are legal
This guy gets his news from Twitter and Rumble
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I answered that earlier
It's to prevent vigilante retardism like the Tina Peters story. The stupidity of her actions is a pretty poignant example as to why there are rules.
Principle trumps laws all day, every day.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:28 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Principle trumps laws all day, every day.
Macho silliness that leads to the vigilantism society rejects.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This guy gets his news from Twitter and Rumble
So which news sources do you sanction? Has there ever been substantiated news sources via X?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This guy gets his news from Twitter and Rumble
Where do you get your news from? Does it require an antenna or is it podcasts?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Macho silliness that leads to the vigilantism society rejects.
Not really. Principles repel and expose stoopid laws for what they are.
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:32 pm to Placekicker
quote:
Except that Tina Peters is in prison for blowing the whistle on Democrat election fraud in Colorado.
except...again...you have zero evidence of this. none
saying it over and over isn't evidence
tina peters is in prison for breaking existing colorado law. it's very clear
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:46 pm to beaux duke
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
except...again...you have zero evidence of this. none saying it over and over isn't evidence
Except for this…
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:55 pm to Placekicker
the images of files with no context whatsoever looks s00per scary
the video is even cringier. no evidence. just a lot of trust me bro and ominous background music
how do you keep falling for this?
This post was edited on 12/22/25 at 10:57 pm
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:58 pm to Placekicker
If TD needs another profit center, I'd pay to be able to ignore the posts of certain posters.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:59 pm to beaux duke
2025 has been a great year. The truth is coming out about-
1. The Russian Collusion hoax
2. The stolen 2020 elections
3. Government corruption and waste
4. The autopen presidency
5. The Epstein files
And so much more. Just think, this is only year one.
But the best part, by far, is watching the mental gymnastics our Board liberals go through to tell us that all of this isn’t true. It’s glorious!
1. The Russian Collusion hoax
2. The stolen 2020 elections
3. Government corruption and waste
4. The autopen presidency
5. The Epstein files
And so much more. Just think, this is only year one.
But the best part, by far, is watching the mental gymnastics our Board liberals go through to tell us that all of this isn’t true. It’s glorious!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 11:00 pm to RoyalWe
quote:
If TD needs another profit center, I'd pay to be able to ignore the posts of certain posters.
I’d be down…
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News