- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tim Sheehy: "Pakistan appears to have won every engagement so far with Chinese technology"
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:26 pm to wareagle7298
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:26 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
They also have a sh*t ton of their own problems.
Desperate people do Desperate things
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:27 pm to John Barron
Eh, probably not.
This is no different than the Saudis going in to Yemen and getting their arse kicked by the Houthis (using old Soviet shite) with brand new, state of the art American equipment. Why did that happen? the Saudis are terrible at military.
The Indian Army is huge, 4th largest I think, they have lots of cool stuff from all over the world and they absolutely suck. Once the British were asked to leave the organization......
Pakis are leaner and meaner.
This is no different than the Saudis going in to Yemen and getting their arse kicked by the Houthis (using old Soviet shite) with brand new, state of the art American equipment. Why did that happen? the Saudis are terrible at military.
The Indian Army is huge, 4th largest I think, they have lots of cool stuff from all over the world and they absolutely suck. Once the British were asked to leave the organization......
Pakis are leaner and meaner.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:30 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Truth is "the OG F16’s that we sell to shitty middle eastern countries" would dispose of anything in the air on either side if the F16s were equipped with modern US detection, evasion, and weapon systems.
It’s like pretending that the OG F16’s that we sell to shitty middle eastern countries
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:32 pm to Seldom Seen
quote:
All the more reason to keep them as an ally rather than making an enemy out of them.
They are an enemy and there is nothing we can do about that except whip their arse, which is what we are about to do.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:33 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
40 year old French systems at that.
Incorrect. You know that the Rafale Fighter has been modernized and is considered a 4.5 generation Fighter Jet. So why play stupid and lie about its current capabilities?
"The French Rafale fighter jet is not based on 40-year-old technology, though its origins trace back to the 1980s. The Rafale program began in the mid-1980s, with Dassault Aviation developing the first prototype, the Rafale A, which flew in 1986. However, the production aircraft, starting with the Rafale C, M, and B variants, entered service much later, with the French Navy’s Rafale M operational in 2001 and the Air Force’s variants in 2006.
The Rafale has undergone continuous upgrades, making its current iterations significantly more advanced than its initial designs. Key systems, like the RBE2 AESA radar (introduced around 2012), Thales SPECTRA electronic warfare suite, and advanced avionics, reflect modern technology. The F3R standard, operational since 2018, and the ongoing F4 standard (with deliveries starting in 2021) include cutting-edge features like improved sensors, network-centric warfare capabilities, and compatibility with modern weapons like the Meteor missile. The Snecma M88 engines, while based on a 1990s design, have been upgraded for better performance and efficiency.
While the airframe and core design stem from the 1980s and 1990s, the Rafale’s systems, software, and weaponry have been consistently modernized. For context, 40-year-old technology would align with aircraft like the F-16A or Mirage 2000, which lack the Rafale’s current multi-role capabilities and advanced electronics. The Rafale’s iterative development keeps it competitive with contemporaries like the Eurofighter Typhoon or F-35, though some argue its base platform is less “next-gen” than stealth-focused designs.
So, no, the Rafale isn’t 40-year-old technology—it’s a continually evolved platform with modern systems layered onto a design rooted in the 1980s."
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:34 pm to John Barron
What generation of western tech is India using BTW?
An F-16 is still an F-16 but different generations and levels of tech under the hood are a thing.
An F-16 is still an F-16 but different generations and levels of tech under the hood are a thing.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:35 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Truth is "the OG F16’s that we sell to shitty middle eastern countries" would dispose of anything in the air on either side if the F16s were equipped with modern US detection, evasion, and weapon systems.
That would make them very much NOT original F-16 base/export models though. Which is my entire point.
India’s Rafales are “new” in that they are recently manufactured, but they don’t have anything approaching the systems that the French currently use. Same sort with the MiG 29 and Su 30’s that India has. Nothing like their modern Russian counterparts
Same thing with Pakistan. None of their J-ripoff whatever’s are anything approaching what China currently employs.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:36 pm to _Hurricane_
Let me know when wish.com navy is actually a threat. Until then, this thread is nonsense.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:36 pm to John Barron
FRANCE’S Rafales have the latest tech.
The export models that they sold to India do not.
ETA: Did you use ChatGPT or Grok or another AI for your post?
The export models that they sold to India do not.
ETA: Did you use ChatGPT or Grok or another AI for your post?
This post was edited on 5/13/25 at 5:37 pm
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:38 pm to John Barron
It’s not Chinese technology.
It’s American technology stolen by the Chinese.
It’s American technology stolen by the Chinese.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:39 pm to teke184
quote:
What generation of western tech is India using BTW?
"The Indian Air Force (IAF) operates 36 Dassault Rafale jets, acquired through a 2016 deal with France. These jets are built to the F3R standard, which became operational in 2018. The F3R standard includes advanced features like the RBE2 AESA radar, Thales SPECTRA electronic warfare suite, improved avionics, and compatibility with modern weapons such as the Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile and SCALP cruise missile. India’s Rafales also incorporate 13 India-specific enhancements, including advanced sensors, helmet-mounted displays, and high-altitude operation capabilities tailored for India’s Himalayan region.
The Rafale is widely considered a 4.5-generation fighter jet. This classification stems from its advanced avionics, reduced radar cross-section (forward-hemisphere stealth), supercruise capability (sustained supersonic flight without afterburners), and network-centric warfare capabilities, which surpass typical 4th-generation fighters like the F-16 but fall short of full 5th-generation stealth aircraft like the F-35. The F3R standard enhances these 4.5-generation traits with upgraded sensors and electronic systems
In summary, India’s Rafale jets are built to the F3R standard and are classified as 4.5-generation fighters due to their advanced systems and capabilities, with potential upgrades to the F4 standard in the future"
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:39 pm to Lynxrufus2012
quote:Best jets on the planet if flown in reverse ... aka run away! run away! mode.
They have bought French jets.
If India ever needs to conduct a synchronized retrograde, they should hire Milley to lead it, and French equipment to supply it.
This post was edited on 5/13/25 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:40 pm to John Barron
quote:Is it now?
The Rafale is widely considered a 4.5-generation fighter jet.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:46 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
The export models that they sold to India do not
The export model India purchased was built to the F3R standard which was only available starting in 2018. It is not 40 year old technology like you claimed. It is considered a 4.5 generation Fighter Jet.
"The Indian Air Force (IAF) operates 36 Dassault Rafale jets, acquired through a 2016 deal with France. These jets are built to the F3R standard, which became operational in 2018. The F3R standard includes advanced features like the RBE2 AESA radar, Thales SPECTRA electronic warfare suite, improved avionics, and compatibility with modern weapons such as the Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile and SCALP cruise missile. India’s Rafales also incorporate 13 India-specific enhancements, including advanced sensors, helmet-mounted displays, and high-altitude operation capabilities tailored for India’s Himalayan region."
This post was edited on 5/13/25 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 5/13/25 at 5:50 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
ChatGPT or Grok?
I'm going to guess DeepSeek
Posted on 5/13/25 at 6:00 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
ChatGPT or Grok?
The part in quotes is Grok. It is always good to give sources instead of making outrageous claims that the India Rafale’s are 40 year old technology
Posted on 5/13/25 at 6:05 pm to _Hurricane_
quote:
I’ll never understand why some people here refuse to comprehend that China is a huge fricking threat. Such arrogance
Recognizing the threat isn't the same as being fearful of it or even overly concerned about it. China's confident so why shouldn't we be? Difference is, we've proven we kick arse, what has China proven? That they can steal our shite, build stuff and moneywhip poor countries? Let's see it on the battle field if it comes to that. No one touches an organized, united, pissed off USA in war. Got to come here at some point and that's a task few, if any, will take on.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 6:16 pm to _Hurricane_
quote:
I’ll never understand why some people here refuse to comprehend that China is a huge fricking threat. Such arrogance.
Many of us think China is a massive threat.
But John has been screaming that we need to cancel the F-35 program.
Can China Exports beat French Exports?
Obviously.
But besides bragging about China iz awesome (Russia not been so awesome lately) what does this actually mean?
We don't know, domestic France and Domestic China are totally different animals.
I still think China mops the floor with them, but none of us (nor a LLM) have any data that informs us.
What does this mean for the USA?
We need more F-35s B-21s, F-47s.
We need way more planes.
If you want a guy who talks about our short comings without loving on China you should try this guy.
https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/
And yes, I do think he's worth reading, way more than random LLM output on things that don't actually share data.
Posted on 5/13/25 at 6:23 pm to lsufanva
quote:
Recognizing the threat isn't the same as being fearful of it
You are correct. But the only ones acting fearful are the ones like SDVTIGER who consistently deny reality and claim anything posted about China is fake news or AI manipulated. When a former Navy Seal is telling you the Truth but you refuse to believe reality that shows who is actually fearful
Popular
Back to top


0





