- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on what is taught in Louisiana Public Schools Re: World Religions
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:16 am to Bard
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:16 am to Bard
quote:
That's about all it needs. All 3 are covered to equal measure without getting into politics.
I think you are showing favoritism and bias towards Christianity with your Christianity write up. It should be very bland and not taking in huge interpretations of the beliefs of each group.
IMO. They should state the prominant figure the group was started by and that they all claim the same god. Then just state they all recognize themselves as the true intepretation of that god. Simple and end of discussion for a public school imo.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:16 am to Bard
quote:
I think what they mean is that period in time (at least that's what I hope they mean).
It's not even correct, though. Islam is of the middle ages.
I guess maybe it makes sense in a 'this is when we will touch on all major world religions' standpoint, it just weird tying that to Ancient Rome.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:21 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's not even correct, though. Islam is of the middle ages.
I guess maybe it makes sense in a 'this is when we will touch on all major world religions' standpoint, it just weird tying that to Ancient Rome.
i guess if they include the byzantine empire in the "ancient rome" curriculum you can introduce the origins and development of islam.
even if that's not the rationale, one could argue that islam developed during "late antiquity" rather than the early middle ages.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:21 am to Bunsbert Montcroff
quote:
i think it's useful to make a distinction between the spread of the early islamic empires, like the umayyads and abassids (which spread through military conquest), and the spread of the islamic religion (which occurred in phases for varied reasons - remember that non-arabs were barred from converting to islam during the early umayyad conquests).
But that restriction was lifted fairly early on, in a relative sense. Early Islam could not have spread without the weakened Byzantine and Sasanian Empires, who had been fighting for 5 centuries, on and off, which in addition to weakening both empires, created lots of alienated groups who were eager to align with outsiders.
I mean, the North African Berbers were converted very early on, and formed the bulk of the army for the Umayyad expansion to Europe. People like discussing how important the Battle of Tours was in 732, but people don't talk about there was another Islamic incursion into the area the next year, and that Umayyad expansion only stopped in the area with a Berber revolt in 740, if I recall.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:23 am to jwall3
Definitely slanted against Christianity and for Islam.
I also take except to the article title "Three Religions, One God", because that is not true. Jesus is God in Christianity and Jews and Muslims reject that, therefore creating a fundamental difference in who "God" is. Also, God is defined by His characteristics. His characteristics are very different between the Judeo-Christian understanding and the Muslim understanding, which means that the god of Islam has to be different from the God of the Bible.
I also take except to the article title "Three Religions, One God", because that is not true. Jesus is God in Christianity and Jews and Muslims reject that, therefore creating a fundamental difference in who "God" is. Also, God is defined by His characteristics. His characteristics are very different between the Judeo-Christian understanding and the Muslim understanding, which means that the god of Islam has to be different from the God of the Bible.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:25 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's not even correct, though. Islam is of the middle ages.
While that might be, Muslims referred to their Greek-speaking enemies of the Byzantine Empire as Romans all the way up to the 1st Crusade. If I recall correctly, up until the 18th Century, some people in Hellenic areas still referred to themselves as Roman. There was no hard stop on the term itself. In the West there is a clear delineation between the Western and Eastern halves of the Roman Empire, but the appellation "Roman" continued in the Eastern half for a long time.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:28 am to jwall3
quote:
There, Jewish communities were often subject to discrimination and violence at the hands of Christians. Christianity has also had a problematic relationship with Islam. Christians do not accept Muhammad as a prophet. While many Christians in the Middle East converted to Islam during and after the seventh century, the Church hierarchy in Rome and Constantinople considered Islam to be both a political and theological threat.
quote:This is true, but the Muslim conquest is glossed over, don't you think? I mean, 400 years of hostility only gets a mention?
The Crusades were an unsuccessful attempt to reverse the Islamic conquest of the eastern Mediterranean and the holy places of all three monotheistic religions.
quote:Wow. Well, it just goes to illustrate how much headway into our society muslims were able to incur during Obama's term.
Jews and Christians are specifically protected in the Quran as Peoples of the Book, reinforcing their spiritual connection to Islam by virtue of having been given revelations from God. The Islamic legal tradition has upheld the rights of Jews and Christians to maintain their beliefs and practices within their communities in Islamic lands, and this policy of tolerance has generally been upheld.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:29 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
It's not even correct, though. Islam is of the middle ages.
Maybe they've extended the range of "Ancient" Rome?
Putting aside devil's advocacy, this truly is a sterling example of how simple things like that often make it into teaching texts. Text book sales are big money and that sometimes means sacrificing quality.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:31 am to crazy4lsu
I get your point. However, Byzantium is typically always distinguished clearly from "Ancient" Rome.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:31 am to FooManChoo
quote:
His characteristics are very different between the Judeo-Christian understanding and the Muslim understanding, which means that the god of Islam has to be different from the God of the Bible.
Well there is more overlap between Islam and Judaism than there is Judaism and Christianity in its direct pattern of practice. Islam is a syncretic version Judaism with pre-Islamic Arab paganism, combined with aspects of Christianity and Zoroastrianism. The differences that arise are more of a modern development, but Islam very closely resembles Judaism.
If I recall, the Christ story in the Qu'ran closely resembles a book from the Biblical Apocrypha. I can't remember the name at the moment though.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:32 am to Bard
This is not a textbook issue. There is no textbook used here. If I were to consult the classroom textbook, which I rarely do, Islam is not brought in until the African civilizations after the unit on Rome. The state has chosen to place the overview of these religions here during Rome. I know that Christianity is well placed here. I think the state was looking to simply knock all of this out in one activity.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:35 am to Y.A. Tittle
In years past there was never any confusion as the schism between west and east had already been covered. Keep in mind that these are 6th graders. They probably won't remember any of this with great detail after they leave the class. I am only concerned that they will read this article and leave with the overall impression that Christians are mean, intolerant people who force their religion on everyone while Islam is peaceful and just accepts everyone and whatever they believe. Life is not that clear cut and there are too many examples to the contrary for that to be a fair assessment.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:41 am to jwall3
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 11:07 am
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:44 am to jwall3
That was written by an SJW. They have run amok in education for decades.
It's all part of controlling the masses.
It's all part of controlling the masses.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:46 am to jwall3
quote:
Islam is tolerant and accepts them both peacefully
PIECEfully
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:46 am to jwall3
Just tell your students that the Oracle of Delphi was the bomb. Bitch could see into the future.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 11:46 am to Bard
quote:That's extremely accurate.
Christianity: Although Christianity developed out of Judaic texts, Christians do not follow Jewish law. Instead, they believe that the ritualistic Jewish law was abrogated in favor of a universal gospel for all of humanity and the Christian teaching, "Love thy neighbor as thyself." Christians view Jews as refusing to move forward and Muslims as following a false prophet.
Islam: Islam sees Judaism and Christianity as earlier versions of Islam, revelations given within the same tradition by Allah but misunderstood over time by their followers. Muslims see Islam as the final, complete, and correct revelation in the monotheistic tradition of the three faiths. The Islamic tradition recognizes many of the Jewish and Christian prophets, including Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (although he is not considered to be the son of God).
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:20 pm to jwall3
quote:
The activity is suggested by the state in their new Scope and Sequence for social studies 6th grade. Basically, an overview of what students should know and be able to do in order to pass the LEAP 2025 test in the Spring. Any teacher may, if they clear it with their district or school, change these sources and activities up. For our purposes here in the Political Board, I was using the snow day to get ahead and check out what the state is suggesting for the next unit. Was curious if anyone else thought this was a very one sided take on these religions.
don't know that 6th graders need to learn about the way one persecuted the other, just yet ... it's an obvious attempt to present the dominant religion in america in harsher terms, but that topic/idea or anything similar to it can wait till 9th grade or whenever WH part 2 is taken ... they don't need to dive into arguments about history & religion just yet, imo ...
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:21 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Relationships between Jewish and Christian communities have often been difficult
Except the fact that Israel, a Jewish nation, is one of our biggest allies.
You're just going to throw out over a thousand years of virulent Christian antisemitism in Europe peaking with The Holocaust?
Seems this constant slurpage & talking point about Israel is Christian guilt due to Christians abhorrent treatment of Jews to the point of nearly annihilating the Religion.
Posted on 1/18/18 at 12:22 pm to jwall3
Tell them about how Mohammed married an 8 year old
Popular
Back to top


1









