- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm to the808bass
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm to the808bass
0
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
Administrative question, what does the F mean and how many are there?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a lot of dishonesty flooded online and cable news.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
You have an organization
You have someone that represents and acts on behalf of the organization
You pay that organization through that representative
That representative directs that organization in the way you instructed
My analogy is PERFECT AND IN ALIGNMENT with the indictment
You have someone that represents and acts on behalf of the organization
You pay that organization through that representative
That representative directs that organization in the way you instructed
My analogy is PERFECT AND IN ALIGNMENT with the indictment
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:49 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
its ironic that he used a mob analogy earlier to defend "paying snitches". Many top mobsters were brought to justice on lesser charges so that stronger cases could be tried.
The SPLC lacked this authority. They could not "bring the racists to justice" (to use your words)
The feds also relied on pure snitches in some cases.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:50 pm to Vacherie Saint
Wonder what SFP’s position on the matter would be if TPUSA was caught giving money and supervision to antifa and BLM operatives who organized events where ICE agents/facilties were attacked?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:51 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Administrative question, what does the F mean
That's the abbreviation for the informants. It stands for "field sources"
I'm not sure if we got an exact amount, but at least 42 (as there is an F-42 referenced)
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:51 pm to Old Sarge
SFP needs to see a gigantic, Publishers Clearinghouse bank check made payable to the KKK with "fraud money" scribbled on the memo line.
Just like the one the libs wanted to see for the Mexico border wall.
Just like the one the libs wanted to see for the Mexico border wall.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:51 pm to Vacherie Saint
And the government paying informants has very little value as an analogy to a non-profit paying informants inside an ideologically opposed group.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:52 pm to Vacherie Saint
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that white supremacist hate groups don't tend to leave much of a paper trail for accountants. Seems like a cash-is-king type of scenario. The SPLC paid 277,000 dollars to a guy who was organizing rallies for a hate group. The SPLC was funding the hate group whether retard will admit it or not. It's obvious to everyone else.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:52 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
You have someone that represents and acts on behalf of the organization
You pay that organization through that representative
That representative directs that organization in the way you instructed
You're really forcing this
And I understand that's how you want to have it unfold, but that's not what the indictment alleges.
quote:
My analogy is PERFECT AND IN ALIGNMENT with the indictment
The indictment literally alleges the scenario I posted, where they paid an informant to steal from the organization.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:53 pm to the808bass
quote:
And the government paying informants has very little value as an analogy to a non-profit paying informants inside an ideologically opposed group.
If the goal of both is information/evidence gathering, why is the analogy bad?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It stands for "field sources"
quote:
I'm not sure if we got an exact amount, but at least 42
Damn. This seems like a lot.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:54 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:54 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Damn. This seems like a lot.
The indictment acknowledges they've been doing this since the 80s.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If the goal of both is information/evidence gathering, why is the analogy bad?
I asked myself this earlier. It's an interesting thought. My initial thought was some level of immunity that is offered to law enforcement for funding crimes vs whatever the SPLC and in general citizen orgs have in that arena.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:56 pm to Ailsa
right around the time SPLC started funneling money to "hate groups" they magically reappeared from the dustbin of history in matching uniforms, clad with police-grade riot gear, and toting professionally printed massaging.
So odd.
So odd.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:57 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I asked myself this earlier. It's an interesting thought. My initial thought was some level of immunity that is offered to law enforcement for funding crimes vs whatever the SPLC and in general citizen orgs have in that arena.
If they hadn't relied on donors (and, clearly engaged in the bank chicanery) none of this would be illegal at all. As a private person you can pay people to snitch from other groups and gather the evidence/intel.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:57 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
right around the time SPLC started funneling money to "hate groups"
The indictment says they've been doing this since the 80s
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:59 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
right around the time SPLC started funneling money to "hate groups" they magically reappeared from the dustbin of history in matching uniforms, clad with police-grade riot gear, and toting professionally printed massaging.
Page 20 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News