- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:40 pm to AlterEd
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:40 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Next we will learn that the SPLC had "undercover informants" paying for the 9-11 highjackers flight lessons.
And J6...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
0
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
This is where the real world and SFP world diverge.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Under the direction of SPLC F37 made racist remarks.
Under the direction.
Yummy.
Not snitches
Actions.
Under the direction.
Yummy.
Not snitches
Actions.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
misled them how? If there's nothing wrong with SPLC paying "informants" than how were the donors defrauded?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think we'd need some accounting evidence
Sure, which at this point we have as much of as we do of any of these people actually just "snitching" on anything.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:42 pm to Vacherie Saint
That’s his argument. The group wasn’t supported by the SLPC. Only the individual was.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:42 pm to Jbird
quote:
Under the direction of SPLC F37 made racist remarks.
Again, that's all you got?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:43 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
misled them how?
That is a good question.
quote:
If there's nothing wrong with SPLC paying "informants" than how were the donors defrauded?
Why this part of the case is much weaker than the bank part.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to the808bass
The "individual" being a key organizer and rally planner within the group. But he needs to hear it from someone other than Todd Blanche or else it cant be true.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to the808bass
quote:
That’s his argument. The group wasn’t supported by the SLPC. Only the individual was.
No different argument. What you said is about the allegations of "funding" the groups (which isn't alleged in the indictment)
The exchange to which you replied was about the government's allegations that SPLC defrauded its donors by using these snitches.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
So not snitches but actionable actors for that cash
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
do you ever answer a question?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
That doesn’t align with the indictment
My analogy aligns with the indictment
My analogy aligns with the indictment
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:45 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
do you ever answer a question?
You're poking holes in the government's case.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
but you told us that there's nothing wrong with using snitches.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
The point of the case is to publicly pants the SLPC. Sophistry aside, that has already happened.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:46 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
That doesn’t align with the indictment
How?
You have an organization
You have an individual of that organization
You have the SPLC paying the individual to get information (and in one case, steal) from the organization
Your analogy involved a direct relationship/contracting between SPLC (the consumer) and the racial group (Walmart). That isn't alleged.
*ETA: one of the example is literally my example, mind you.
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
The point of the case is to publicly pants the SLPC.
I agree.
But in doing so, a lot of dishonesty flooded online and cable news.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm to the808bass
its ironic that he used a mob analogy earlier to defend "paying snitches". Many top mobsters were brought to justice on lesser charges so that stronger cases could be tried.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 2:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I was assuming nothing. It was a personal statement.
You're making a very large assumption in this context.
I've supervised scores of people in a high stakes world over the years. Supervision absolutely means care applied under my direction ... and my responsibility. I've also directed too many others to count who were not under my supervision.
What context is it, as defined in the materials you are referencing, that would alter those meanings?
Page 19 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News