- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:17 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:17 pm to Y.A. Tittle
they were paying the leaders of these hate groups to snitch on themselves! that doesnt come cheap!
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Then why did you bring it up?
If they'd not relied on donors, they not be in business. If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle. If, if, if ...
---
None of this has anything to do with his comment discussing potential distinctions with LEO like immunity.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:22 pm to NC_Tigah
because there was a fleeting moment when that narrative was useful to him, but its not anymore so its now irrelevant and you are not allowed to bring it up.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:22 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
So organizing the TikiTorch Charlottesville NeoNazi gaslight
Do better.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:23 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What were they continuing to pay for him to do there during the 9 years after he did that?
Information, I would guess.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:23 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
And the information stolen was used to grow and benefit the hate organization
What? Where is this text?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:24 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
because there was a fleeting moment when that narrative was useful to him, but its not anymore so its now irrelevant and you are not allowed to bring it up.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:24 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Then why did you bring it up?
He brought up the distinctions and I replied relevantly.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:25 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
because there was a fleeting moment when that narrative was useful to him, but its not anymore so its now irrelevant and you are not allowed to bring it up.
I responded relevantly to GRT's post.
NC did not respond relevantly to mine. I assume he didn't read what was being discussed
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
Google it, the article written with the purchased information led to a exponential growth in donations and membership to the National Alliance
SLPC gave money to the National alliance and that money was used to grow it
The alliance was basically dead as an organization until SPLC revived it
SLPC gave money to the National alliance and that money was used to grow it
The alliance was basically dead as an organization until SPLC revived it
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I responded relevantly to GRT's post.
I don't agree with your response, fwiw. Surely a citizen paying someone to commit crime is handled differently than law enforcement doing it.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
because there was a fleeting moment when that narrative was useful to him, but its not anymore so its now irrelevant and you are not allowed to bring it up.
I responded relevantly to GRT's post.
NC did not respond relevantly to mine. I assume he didn't read what was being discussed
You literally just proved him correct.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I responded relevantly
quote:
NC did not respond relevantly

Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:30 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Surely a citizen paying someone to commit crime is handled differently than law enforcement doing it.
Well that isn't exactly what I responded with. You're using a subsequent example from another discussion tree.
But yes, SPLC is likely guilty of conspiracy to commit theft (in what I'd imagine is a misdemeanor amount). That + one guy who wasn't even part of a major org giving rides to a few people to UTR are the 2 main examples being relied upon in this story.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I've figured it out. SFPLC is convinced that the SPLC monitors this board. He thinks they are reading this thread and he is trying to pitch his paralegal services to them. The problem is that they're only going to read this shite and realize he is retarded.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
I thought you read the indictment?!?!
They were paying the Grand Wizards and Exalted Cyclopses too. Probably to inform on themselves, I’m sure!
They were paying the Grand Wizards and Exalted Cyclopses too. Probably to inform on themselves, I’m sure!
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Whoa.
So organizing the TikiTorch Charlottesville NeoNazi gaslight
---
Do better.
Come again?
You think everyone at Charlottesville was a neonazi?
You think most at Charlottesville were neonazi's?
You think any at Charlottesville but an exceedingly small minority were neonazi?
You think the SPLC/F-37 effort was not designed to specifically set up a false narrative about Charlottesville, to gaslight the public? You think the effort to leave the public under the impression that all in attendance, certainly all carrying a torch, were neonazis was something other than gaslighting?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:36 pm to AlterEd
He’s afraid he’ll end up on their hate map with other noted Klansmen like Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh!
Hell, he might want to be on that list. It looks like they’ll pay you handsomely for it!
Hell, he might want to be on that list. It looks like they’ll pay you handsomely for it!
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:36 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
I thought you read the indictment?!?!
I did. They aren't charged with theft.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You noted things that literally could not occur. How is that relevant?
Then why did you bring it up?
---
He brought up the distinctions and I replied relevantly.
Popular
Back to top



0






