- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This SPLC Thing is a Bigger Deal Than Most Realize
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Are there not folks you supervise?
That representative directs that organization in the way you instructed
---
You're really forcing this
Because that seems to be a huge catch point here.
1
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
indictment says they've been doing this since the 80s
No doubt, but the money connected to this indictment was in the last 10 years or so right? I assume their shenanigans of yesteryear are off limits with SoL.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:04 pm to NC_Tigah
He described paying an organization via its employee for goods/services directly contracted with the organization. The money you exchange is revenue of the organization.
That is NOT what happened with SPLC.
SPLC paid the "employee" directly to act against the interest of their "employer" in a clandestine manner. I used the example of paying them to steal from the employer, which the SPLC did with F-9 exactly.
If you pay an employee of Walmart to steal something for you from Walmart, that money is not counted as Walmart's revenue.
That is NOT what happened with SPLC.
SPLC paid the "employee" directly to act against the interest of their "employer" in a clandestine manner. I used the example of paying them to steal from the employer, which the SPLC did with F-9 exactly.
If you pay an employee of Walmart to steal something for you from Walmart, that money is not counted as Walmart's revenue.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're really forcing this
No, I’m really not, the indictment is quite clear and everything I’ve stated is in alignment with the indictment
You have a fairy tale in your head to protect you from truth
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:04 pm to GRTiger
Yes. I have to imagine it's a SOL issue.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
and "between 2014 and 2023 they suddenly began paying informants in a clandestine manner"... millions of dollars. Hmmmmm. I wonder what happened between 2014 and 2023?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:05 pm to Ailsa
SFPLC has been on this thread like a fly on shite literally all day long. Times must be tough at the Boosie and SFP law firm.
Also, considering it appears the guy is literally refreshing this thread and has been for hours to shill it tells me there is a lot more to come from this story.
He is panicked.
Also, considering it appears the guy is literally refreshing this thread and has been for hours to shill it tells me there is a lot more to come from this story.
He is panicked.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
No where does the indictment align with this fabricated tale of yours
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:05 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Also, considering it appears the guy is literally refreshing this thread and has been for hours to shill it tells me there is a lot more to come from this story.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:If they'd not relied on donors, they not be in business. If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle. If, if, if ...
If they hadn't relied on donors (and, clearly engaged in the bank chicanery) none of this would be illegal at all.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:06 pm to Old Sarge
quote:
No where does the indictment align with this fabricated tale of yours
Read paragraph b, F-9.
He was paid by the SPLC to steal from his org. 25 boxes of information.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:07 pm to AlterEd
you dont get to a half million posts by having a fulfilling and productive life.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:07 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
If they'd not relied on donors, they not be in business. If my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle. If, if, if ...
None of this has anything to do with his comment discussing potential distinctions with LEO like immunity.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:07 pm to SlowFlowPro
It wasn't even one minute before you responded to my post. Proving my point that you are literally refreshing this thread over and over to continue to shill it.
I can smell your panic through the internet.
I can smell your panic through the internet.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He was paid by the SPLC to steal from his org. 25 boxes of information.
They directly paid someone to commit a crime. I don't know what the argument is, but that seems pretty cut and dry.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
tell us about some of the other F's... you know, the Grand Wizards, Officers, Chairmen, and Presidents of these hate groups.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
He was paid by the SPLC to steal from his org. 25 boxes of information.
What were they continuing to pay for him to do there during the 9 years after he did that?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:So organizing the TikiTorch Charlottesville NeoNazi gaslight was "against the interest of his employer"? How so?
SPLC paid the "employee" directly to act against the interest of their "employer" in a clandestine manner.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:16 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What were they continuing to pay for him to do there during the 9 years after he did that?
We have to assume it was payment for other criminal acts.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 3:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
One of the many payments? And the information stolen was used to grow and benefit the hate organization and not defeat it so you are wrong again
Page 21 of 32
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News