- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This Country needs comprehensive LGBTQ+ reform.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 1:21 pm to SallysHuman
Posted on 8/30/25 at 1:21 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Your average Gay or Lesbian person has no business being grouped with delusional people who claim they are the opposite sex.
It’s all mental illness. Every last one of them.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 2:20 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:While I won’t say that new evidence won’t make a difference, I will say that we have all the evidence needed. The main point is that it is not an intellectual matter- it’s a matter of the heart/soul/spirit; and that God decides who believes what. As far as evidence goes, it’s really just a bonus.
Thanks, and I am convinced though not unshakably. The reason I say that is because what I consider a fact could change based on new evidence being presented.
quote:I love that dude. He’s the epitome of consistency (at least from what I can tell on TD). Even you should be able to appreciate that.
That’s approaching Foo logic right there
quote:
The Bible is the truth, because it says so in the Bible
All human reasoning regarding the supernatural is ultimately circular. We all ultimately rely on assumptions about things that cannot be proven in this realm. I can’t prove God exists, and you can’t prove He doesn’t. There’s nothing either of us can say to change the other’s mind. But, this seems to support the biblical idea that it is God alone who allots a measure of faith to each of us. IMO.
quote:
Maybe just maybe is it possible that Paul was just making an excuse for his already converted followers to explain why some people didn’t believe his claims? “I tried to teach them but they were incapable of understanding it.” Maybe those people Paul was trying to convert had a decent bullshite detector?
Sure. I’ll grant your maybe. But, is it truly likely? I mean, how many have come and gone in Christ’s name? Why weren’t Jim Jones and David Corresh as effective? Really, considering the effectiveness of the Bible and Christianity in general- it’s hard to put it in the same class as the others. Like it or not, Christianity is responsible for all the good things in your life. Christianity is a necessary component of the success of “the West.”
quote:
If that were somehow true, then Jesus didn’t want me to be saved.
Not yet. “Saved” is a final condition. We’re still running the course. TBD.
quote:
would rather you spend your day with your family watching football and drinking a beer - ya know things that matter.
My friend- I am doing all of the above (in moderation). And I believe that God has put you in my life for good reason (hopefully for both our enrichment). Consider yourself extended family that I have yet to meet.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 2:25 pm to ronricks
quote:
It’s all mental illness. Every last one of them.
It’s all spiritual illness.
Q: What’s the difference between a tranny, a ghey/lez, and a heterosexual man/woman who defiles the marriage bed- in the eyes of God?
A: Nothing.
All.
Sexual.
Immorality.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 3:00 pm to GooseSix
We need common sense tranny control
Posted on 8/30/25 at 9:27 pm to Prodigal Son
quote:
While I won’t say that new evidence won’t make a difference, I will say that we have all the evidence needed.
Maybe you, but all the scientific evidence I have patently disproves the biblical narratives to me. Even if you wanted to allege that a deity created all matter and energy and the cosmos, it doesn’t mean that El or Yahweh did it. It could have been any of the thousands of deities imagined by man or none of them. I think your statement is fallacious. If I had evidence of a deity, or a specific one named El or Yahweh or Vishnu, I would at least have to acknowledge that deity’s existence. If there was substantive evidence of your particular deity that was clear and incontrovertible, then everyone would have to acknowledge that deity.
quote:
The main point is that it is not an intellectual matter- it’s a matter of the heart/soul/spirit;
I have to disagree with you. I think the issue is you have a desire and willingness to believe what you were taught and it is comforting to you. On the other hand I have a desire to believe whatever the facts show to be true regardless of whether it gives me comfort.
quote:
I love that dude. He’s the epitome of consistency (at least from what I can tell on TD). Even you should be able to appreciate that.
He claims that all the times God commanded the murder of innocent children and babies was “good”.
quote:
All human reasoning regarding the supernatural is ultimately circular. We all ultimately rely on assumptions about things that cannot be proven in this realm. I can’t prove God exists, and you can’t prove He doesn’t
I don’t need to. The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. What can and has been proven though is that Adam and Eve never existed (genetics), there was never a global flood, there was never a great exile of Jews from Egypt, and so on. If the Bible is full of ancient myths that preceded it and of stories that we know couldn’t have happened, then everything in the collection of books is suspect.
quote:
There’s nothing either of us can say to change the other’s mind. But, this seems to support the biblical idea that it is God alone who allots a measure of faith to each of us.
God or Jesus could just reveal himself to me. To everyone. Bam. Everyone would be a christian. Everyone would be saved. It would be super easy for the omniscient omnipresent omnipotent deity if he cared one iota.
quote:
Like it or not, Christianity is responsible for all the good things in your life. Christianity is a necessary component of the success of “the West.
I disagree. But even if it were responsible, it wouldn’t necessarily make it the Truth.
quote:
Consider yourself extended family that I have yet to meet
Cheers bud.
A lot of the hardcore Christians on this site could learn from you. You set the best example of them all in treating others the way the Jesus of the gospels of Luke and John would have treated others.
Hey I don’t think I ever told you this but the parable of the Prodigal Son wasn’t in the original gospel of Luke. Someone added it after the fact. The guy who made the first Christian Bible ever had an earlier version of the gospel of Luke that didn’t include that parable. I’m pretty sure I had brought up Marcion on here before I was banned. I only recently read a reconstructed version of it based on the quotes of the early church fathers who were trash talking it (and him, as a heretic). Neither Epiphanius nor Tertullian mention Marcion deleted the Prodigal Son parable. I believe Marcion’s version was more true to the original, that Marcion didn’t strip it out or delete it, because that parable would have fit well with Marcion’s theology. Marcion hated the Old Testament God who he viewed as hateful and jealous and he didn’t like how the OT God would murder his own people rather than forgive them. He would have loved the Prodigal Son story of forgiveness and family.
ETA: the reason we can be sure the Prodigal Son parable wasn’t in Marcion’s gospel of the Lord was because it wasn’t in the version of Luke used by Tertullian and Epiphanius. Those two church fathers spent a lot of time criticizing every “deletion” they claimed Marcion did to Luke’s gospel. Neither of them mention the deletion of the Prodigal Son. If it wasn’t in their version of the gospel of Luke, they’d have written about Marcion deleting it. None of the church fathers ever mention the Prodigal Son parable when attacking Marcion’s version, but they do comment on just about every parable or narrative that is also in canonical Luke.
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 8:47 am
Posted on 8/30/25 at 10:27 pm to FlySaint
quote:
Why this is ignored and worse yet tolerated I just don’t know.
Let me introduce you to our corporate gaslighting media.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 10:33 pm to GooseSix
It's a mental health crisis.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 10:58 pm to SallysHuman
They are called Terfs. There is a big war between Lesbians and The Trans community.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 10:59 pm to Neutral Underground
quote:
They are called Terfs.
I really like terfs... TransExclusionaryRadicalFeminists... I'm not down with their man hating, but they know what a woman is.
Posted on 8/30/25 at 11:19 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I think B is for bisexual... it's still just a sex preference rather than delusion based.
I knew someone who said they were bi because they had a boyfriend, who became her girlfriend, then they broke up.
My theory was he was a soy-beta-male and she was a major catalyst for him to transition, and represses the fact that she pushed him away.
Because… women.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 8:59 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
Maybe you, but all the scientific evidence I have patently disproves the biblical narratives to me.
Exactly. Why is that? Why does an atheist and a theist of equal intelligence come to different conclusions when evaluating the same evidence? I’m not talking about you and me. I’m talking about credentialed professionals in various scientific disciplines. If intelligence and ability are equal, then it must be a difference in desire that leads each to their own conclusions.
quote:You mean like seeing the resurrected Jesus Christ?
If there was substantive evidence of your particular deity that was clear and incontrovertible, then everyone would have to acknowledge that deity.
Luke 16:31 New American Standard Bible 1995
31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’”
It’s not a matter of evidence- it’s a matter of desire.
quote:
I have to disagree with you. I think the issue is you have a desire and willingness to believe what you were taught and it is comforting to you. On the other hand I have a desire to believe whatever the facts show to be true regardless of whether it gives me comfort.
Sounds like we agree that belief is driven by desire. But I have a hard time believing that your “facts” don’t give you comfort- in light of the consequences of being wrong (Pascal).
quote:
He claims that all the times God commanded the murder of innocent children and babies was “good”.
I’ll spare you the obvious morality argument. I think the analogy of a janitor judging the CEO is more appropriate. And self-explanatory.
quote:
The burden of proof is on the one making the claim.
I agree. An agnostic claims not to know. That checks out. A Christian claims only faith in God, and gives multiple arguments to support the validity of his belief. An atheist claims that God doesn’t exist. That’s a claim. It’s one thing to say “I dont believe in God because…” It’s a completely different thing to say “God doesn’t exist.”
quote:
God or Jesus could just reveal himself to me. To everyone. Bam. Everyone would be a christian.
I’ll spare you the accusations of Romans 1:18-32. I believe it, but I know you’ve heard it a thousand times.
I’m actually hoping for some kind of universalism to be true. I won’t even attempt to defend it, biblically. I just hope. I’d actually rather none of it be true than for anyone to suffer eternally. But, I’m just a janitor.
If not that, then the total annihilation of NPCs doesn’t seem too bad.
ETA: Thank you for the compliment and the story about the Prodigal Son!
This post was edited on 8/31/25 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 8/31/25 at 11:47 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
Once you start to accept certain curated versions of reality, there is no end to that really. Every single limit you'd place is entirely arbitrary.
This is the correct answer.
People around the (probable) average age of the board draw a distinction only because the trans stuff is new to them and the gay is not.
They removed homosexuality from the DSM in 1973 and removed any diagnoses related to it in 1987.
They only removed "gender identity disorder" in 2013 and replaced it with "gender dysphoria," which is designed to deny that there is anything wrong with a persistent delusion about what you are, the only problem is how you feel about it. It's basically the same thing they did with homosexuality.
In any case, you are correct. Neither gay nors trans are normal.
Posted on 9/1/25 at 8:09 am to GooseSix
You guys are kidding yourselves if you think there’s going to be any “reform” on this outside of trans in sports and hormone therapy for kids.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 1:50 pm to Prodigal Son
quote:
If intelligence and ability are equal, then it must be a difference in desire that leads each to their own conclusions.
One has a desire to learn the truth and to go wherever the evidence leads. One has a desire to make believe fantasy, because it is personally comforting, so he gins up concepts that are not in evidence tricks himself into believing it. That’s my opinion.
quote:
You mean like seeing the resurrected Jesus Christ?
A claim of people seeing the resurrected Jesus is not evidence of it happening. Do you believe Mohammed rode to heaven on a flying horse? People also claimed to see Julius Caesar rise from the dead - why don’t you believe them?
quote:
Luke 16:31 New American Standard Bible 1995 31 But he said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be persuaded even if someone rises from the dead.’”
Which is why “John” had to write his story to refute Luke by having Lazarus raised from the dead so that they would be persuaded.
quote:
as an atheist, you’re already comfortable with it being “lights out” when you breathe your last breath.
No I can’t say I’m comfortable with that.
quote:
What do you care if I spend eternity with the God you hate?
It’s tough to hate something I don’t believe exists.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 1:58 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:And yet you do so anyway.
It’s tough to hate something I don’t believe exists
If atheism were true, there would be no imperative to convince anyone of anything at all, including that atheism is true. You being such a staunch apologist for atheism only shows that you hate God.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 2:06 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
And yet you do so anyway.
You’re just saying that because you hate Vishnu and Zeus. Why do you have so much hate in your heart for the other gods?
quote:
If atheism were true
Your deity is fantasy.
quote:
You being such a staunch apologist for atheism only shows that you hate God.
This worn out line never gets old Foo, keep it up!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 2:13 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:I hate them because even the concept of them is antithetical to the truth and to the one, true God.
You’re just saying that because you hate Vishnu and Zeus. Why do you have so much hate in your heart for the other gods?
quote:Your atheism is fantasy.
Your deity is fantasy.
quote:Truth never gets old.
This worn out line never gets old Foo, keep it up!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 2:14 pm to Smeg
quote:
They're just half gays that will have sex with anything.
You either suck dick or you don’t.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 4:13 pm to Squirrelmeister
quote:
One has a desire to learn the truth and to go wherever the evidence leads. One has a desire to make believe fantasy, because it is personally comforting, so he gins up concepts that are not in evidence tricks himself into believing it. That’s my opinion.
Mine as well. I think that’s probably everyone’s opinion, TBH. My only contention is that, well, this meme explains it better than words:
You can say that the theist is guilty of denying “facts.” But, how do you explain my desire (as a theist) for it not to be true? I don’t want to believe in God- I just do (and I believe the same is true of your position). Also, how do you come to the conclusion that your position is any less comforting than mine? I would actually argue that the atheist position is far more comforting than literally any theistic position (other than maybe universalism).
A little over 5 years ago- I was Peter- denying Christ. “It can’t be real. There’s no way a loving God would allow the evil that happens- the death and destruction of the (seemingly) innocent, etc.” I rationalized my adolescent conversion as exactly what you would likely describe as “looking for comfort in the crowd.” I ran, I ran so far awayeeyay.
But as the years passed, I found myself intentionally suppressing the urge to return. I was very thoroughly enjoying the pleasures of the world. I was good at it. I made sin into an artistic expression. No one could drink/drug/fight/frick like me. What a fool I was. I was invincible.
In March of 2011, I lost my father. He was far from perfect (understatement)- but I loved the man. We had a great relationship (once I became an adult). But losing him, while it forced me to deal with and accept mortality- had no effect regarding my desire to continue on the path I had set for myself.
On 12/30/2015, I lost my younger brother. Invincibility was shattered. I was broken. I felt something that I hadn’t felt since I was a teen- vulnerable. But that didn’t change anything for me. I continued to ignore the call- blaming him for his own stupidity and trying to convince my broken mother that none of it really mattered. At that point, even she began to doubt. I was still “OK” but she was rapidly deteriorating. I remember constantly telling her “you should go back to church. You were so much happier when you went to church.” To which she would always reply “I’ll go when you go.” Nope. I’m good. Don’t need it. You do. That’s what I thought. That’s what I believed.
Countless conversations with believers seemingly had no effect- other than strengthening my resolve (sound familiar?). Religion made no sense as anything other than a warm blanky for retards.
But, I had never truly sought answers to the hard questions (the “problem” of evil, the evidence for the life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the evidence for the inspired Word of God). I had never listened to arguments that have existed for thousands of years. I became acutely aware that I lived in intentional ignorance. I realized that I was living exactly the life I desired to live- not necessarily the life of truth and facts that I believed I was. I also realized that I was “kicking against the goads” (Acts 26:14). A light came on. I still fought.
Fast forward to 2020. In my 40’s. Covid, Biden , Trump, trannies, and Rush Limbaugh (who I had never listened to prior) made it apparent to me that this life really is good vs evil. Whether I liked it or not- it was a real thing. At some point (I dont recall the exact day) I called my mom and said “Let’s go to church.”
That was 5 years ago. It has been a process. In some ways (obedience to scripture) my life is harder than it was before. I now feel the guilt (that I became so good at inoculating myself against) when I fail Him. But I also now have a real sense of peace that transcends the cares of this world. I have achieved a childlike faith through exhausting my intellect with the mysteries that He has set before us all.
Because, both the theist and the atheist ultimately rely on faith alone. (Though yours is admittedly much stronger than mine
quote:
A claim of people seeing the resurrected Jesus is not evidence of it happening.
Soooo, eyewitness testimony means nothing? Lol. But that’s not the point. The point is that many people saw the resurrected Jesus- and only some of them were changed by it. That’s the claim.
quote:
Do you believe Mohammed rode to heaven on a flying horse?
Of course not. Unless that’s code for raping children. Then I absolutely believe it.
quote:
People also claimed to see Julius Caesar rise from the dead - why don’t you believe them?
Post a link and let’s discuss.
quote:
Which is why “John” had to write his story to refute Luke by having Lazarus raised from the dead so that they would be persuaded.
Nah. That’s not how it works.
quote:
No I can’t say I’m comfortable with that. (Lights out)
Now that’s interesting. Would you care to elaborate?
quote:
It’s tough to hate something I don’t believe exists.
It’s also tough to explain putting this much effort into debunking Santa Claus. Furthermore, why don’t you put this much effort into debating Mooselimbs? Chicken?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 4:25 pm to GooseSix
With the Democrats out of office it should die down some, it was their way of sticking it to MAGA.
But they don’t really care about figs
But they don’t really care about figs
Popular
Back to top


1







