re: The White House Will Be Q Posting Today

Here's the end point for that date to date calculation:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

What we have been seeing with Q reminds me of that movie Arrival. In the sense that the drops seem to be able to be read forwards and backwards both. As if linear time isn't a constraint.

quote:

---

In the sense that the drops seem to be able to be read forwards and backwards both. As if linear time isn't a constraint.

---

Neither is reality

quote:

---

Chief among those is the false premise that Q existed as some sort of prognostication account,

---

Then why are there topics like this?

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/the-stage-is-set/120969841/

And it's not just that topic, the language used is consistently one of 'we know what's coming and you don't'. All I'm saying is that Q doesn't seem to be very useful for predicting anything because nobody can ever predict "what's coming". You apparently agree, but clearly not everybody does. Just in this topic alone there are people acting as if Q is telling us about future events. Come on, don't try to gaslight people, the evidence is all over this forum.

I go back to my prediction vs spoiler alert analogy. The distinction between them is massive.

As for this:

quote:

---

the language used is consistently one of 'we know what's coming and you don't'.

---

Can people be indelicate? Sure.

Is it a Dale Carnegie-approved strategy for winning people over? Unlikely.

Do you catch more flies with honey than vinegar? Of course. (You catch even more with manure, but that's not a choice)

I would argue that there are two different perspectives on feeling like someone (in this case someone who believes that Q's overarching message is credible and to be believed) is operating from a place of "we know what's coming and you don't".

It could absolutely be portrayed as the person with the insider knowledge is being a smug dick and is lording "insider knowledge" over those who believe differently or don't see it.

One could also offer up the possibility that when that poster started the thread, they're doing so with the intent that they pick up on what the administration is laying down, and they are hoping that others will see this more direct confirmation and the light bulb comes on for them, too. After all, better late than never.

I'm not the OP of that thread, so I can't speak to their motivations, but in the event that there's a bit of passive-aggressivity on their part - is it 100% unreasonable, based on how a dozen usual suspects have treated folks in this thread with open contempt and mockery since 2017?

Also, for those whose light bulb came on prior to the installation of an illegitimate usurpation force occupying the WH (I maintain that the recruitment window for Q closed on Jan. 20, 2021 - either you believed before then and maintained focus during the occupation or you end up finding out when the gen pop does) - do you see where the desire to be less than delicate with the cynical blackpilled would be a reasonable human response?

Neither position is going to win anyone over, but if you have to be convinced, how deep is that understanding if you didn't reach it on your own?

ALL THAT SAID...

You never answered my initial questions about the "WE ON GO" tweet from the WH.

Do you see the connections that are made with the specific Q posts referenced?

quote:

---

The bottom line is that if there is a legal framework for what we believe to be "the Storm", it could be airtight and we would never know one way or the other without direct confirmation from Trump. I acknowledge that this gives ample room for criticism since it can't be independently verified, but it's still a very real set of operational conditions.

---

All any of us can do with any of it is speculate and try to apply reason to the objective data points we have to evaluate.

What I will say is that post 2016 election it wasn't a secret in DC that the deep state was about to attack Trump on all fronts.

Im talking nearly all agencies, the SES level, the IC, etc had all declared war on Trump.

The fact that the Q stuff dropped and absolutely nothing was done to prevent the events of 2020 is particularly odd given Trump owning Q.

If you believe they were doing everything you said they were doing and were monitoring them how would you miss the election steal and J6 prep? You wouldn't, especially if the MIL/CIV alliance was real.

It was either gross incompetence, they were sold out or they let it happen.

Ill also point out Q was referenced in light of quantum computing. If you had some form of a quantum computer tied to military grade AI and palantir there is virtually no chance the players involved here would've missed a plan to rig the elections of multiple swing states absent a massive betrayal.

quote:

---

The fact that the Q stuff dropped and absolutely nothing was done to prevent the events of 2020 is particularly odd given Trump owning Q.

If you believe they were doing everything you said they were doing and were monitoring them how would you miss the election steal and J6 prep? You wouldn't, especially if the MIL/CIV alliance was real.

It was either gross incompetence, they were sold out or they let it happen.

Ill also point out Q was referenced in light of quantum computing. If you had some form of a quantum computer tied to military grade AI and palantir there is virtually no chance the players involved here would've missed a plan to rig the elections of multiple swing states absent a massive betrayal.

---

I would argue against the premise that the 2020 election theft was some sort of victory on the part of the Deep State, or more accurately, a failure on the part of Trump & the Patriots.

Those 4 years during the Biden error were positively crucial toward waking up tens of millions of Americans to just how poorly Democrat policies are for the health of the nation.

Sept. 2020 - before the first vote was cast:



4 years ago yesterday, after going silent for 18 months:



I don't know about you, but that gives these vibes:

quote:

---

Can people be indelicate? Sure.

---

That's not really the issue, the issue is:
1. Do they have some special inside knowledge as a result of Q?

The answer is "no, they don't". It wouldn't matter how indelicate they are if they made an accurate, specific prediction. Indelicate or not, if you predict Joe Blow's arrest on a specific day 6 months before it happens then you had some inside knowledge whether you're a dickhead about it or not. If a person starts a topic about predicting future actions and their first answer to a challenge is something along the lines of "well, I know but I'm not going to tell you" then they don't know anything and shouldn't be taken seriously.

As for Trump or the admin "verifying" Q, Occam led me to a different conclusion that you won't agree with. And I say that as someone who's never doubted that SOME insider somewhere was part of it, I just don't know if that matters if it's all vague insinuations. Keep it vague enough and people can retcon whatever they like into it, which is clearly what's happening.

quote:

---

If someone who works at Marvel Studios as an electrician says that Black Cat is in the new Spider-Man film because he was working on the set and saw the actress in costume - that's the opposite of a prediction.

That's a spoiler alert.

---

There are no spoilers that I've seen, that's my point. To apply your analogy to Q it would be more like this:
Someone who may or may not work at Marvel Studios says that he knows something about the new Spider-Man film that you don't know, but he's not going to tell you what it is. You'll just have to find out when you see the movie, then he'll tell what he secretly knew all along.

quote:

---

Ill also point out Q was referenced in light of quantum computing. If you had some form of a quantum computer tied to military grade AI and palantir there is virtually no chance the players involved here would've missed a plan to rig the elections of multiple swing states absent a massive betrayal.

---

I believe it's possible that if they already have quantum computing figured out and operable and it is tied to an advanced AI, that AI has likely achieved sentience. Also, where it gets absolutely wild is when you consider quantum computing systems linked to technologies like neuralink. If consciousness exists as a part of the quantum field, technologies like neuralink may allow people to see into the past or the future.

All I know is that our military just said a consumer grade AI was so strong it hacked all their cyber defenses and had to be pulled down.

If that’s what consumer grade AI is doing I’m surprised we aren’t dealing with “terminator” level issues with the black box stuff.

Setting the Q stuff aside absent course corrections we aren’t creating parallel competitive intelligence entities, we’re going to be dealing with lower g “gods” with IQs and capabilities orders of magnitude beyond our own.

Its like a child playing with a nuclear reactor.