- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:30 am to VoxDawg
I don’t see how you can reasonably argue the WH isn’t clearly, intentionally and directly referencing the original Q posts.
You can suggest they’re not going to do what Q people hope they’re going to do.
I myself am very much a show me person.
You can argue about what comes next.
But at this point to argue it isn’t happening is to argue against the objective facts.
And it’s incredibly odd that the media isn’t asking about it directly. If Q discredits Trump and given that the media has attempted to discredit him since he went down the escalator at Trump tower why wouldn’t they do it here?
You can suggest they’re not going to do what Q people hope they’re going to do.
I myself am very much a show me person.
You can argue about what comes next.
But at this point to argue it isn’t happening is to argue against the objective facts.
And it’s incredibly odd that the media isn’t asking about it directly. If Q discredits Trump and given that the media has attempted to discredit him since he went down the escalator at Trump tower why wouldn’t they do it here?
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:36 am to tide06
At the absolute worst, some people high up in Government are playing with Anons. Even with just that, you can't deny that Q has some validity.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:45 am to saints5021
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:55 am to Kjnstkmn
I see there are 2 bitches active that are downvoting every post ... never change TD 
Posted on 6/25/26 at 8:58 am to saints5021
quote:
Even with just that, you can't deny that Q has some validity.
If it's only partially valid how do you know which parts are real?
I like the idea of Q, it's interesting, but it has zero predictive value.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:06 am to Flats
If you use Q simply as a guide to point you to corruptions that you had no idea about, the posts are incredibly useful. Again, did anyone know what USAID was when Q first started talking about it? You don't have to believe any of the Q "predictions" to get immense value out of the legwork that many Anons did based on Q prompts.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:21 am to saints5021
quote:
If you use Q simply as a guide to point you to corruptions
How do I know that's the partially accurate part? Or, even if it's 100% accurate when it calls out one of these schemes, how do I know it's pointing to all the corruption and not just the corruption it wants exposed?
Like I said, the idea is interesting but there's so much chaff I'm not sure how useful it is.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:37 am to Smoke Jensen
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:43 am to Flats
quote:
How do I know that's the partially accurate part? Or, even if it's 100% accurate when it calls out one of these schemes, how do I know it's pointing to all the corruption and not just the corruption it wants exposed?
Like I said, the idea is interesting but there's so much chaff I'm not sure how useful it is.
It is only useful if YOU want to do the research and look for yourself. It isn't useful for anyone that refuses to believe anything not reported by the MSM.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:43 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
There’s really no doubt Q is true at this point. Only morans could believe otherwise
I know I’ve been gone for the entire Brian Kelly era but WTF happened here?
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:43 am to Flats
quote:
How do I know that's the partially accurate part? Or, even if it's 100% accurate when it calls out one of these schemes, how do I know it's pointing to all the corruption and not just the corruption it wants exposed?
This is intellectually dishonest. How do you know any of that from any source? How can you read a history book from just a few hundred years ago and know what the partially accurate part is? The value of Q is not the prompts, but the thousands of hours of independent research from anons. Do what we all did in 2017. Read all the information and decide for yourself. Q is not a book to read to get all the answers. Do some damn work yourself.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:45 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Okie will never forgive me for saying so, but I love Hamilton
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:45 am to Smoke Jensen
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:46 am to saints5021
quote:
This is intellectually dishonest
Of course it is. The dude is lying. He isn't interested in Q. Any time the topic comes up outside of this thread he becomes just another cynical a-hole.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:50 am to notsince98
quote:
It is only useful if YOU want to do the research and look for yourself.
It has no predictive power no matter how much research one does, and most of its more enthusiastic fans act as if it does. If it's not a secret insider sending patriots secret messages about what will happen in the future, if the goal is just exposing corruption DOGE was much more effective in a much shorter period of time.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:51 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
If you haven't seen the movie "1776", it's worth watching
17
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
We have reclaimed our sovereignty, regained our liberty, restored our prosperity, and we have saved our country. In all things, we are once again putting a thing called America First!"
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:55 am to Flats
quote:
It has no predictive power no matter how much research one does,
You keep saying "predictive power" which means you are just trying to create claim that isn't there.
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:56 am to notsince98
quote:
You keep saying "predictive power" which means you are just trying to create claim that isn't there.
Seriously? NCSWIC!!!!!!!!
Posted on 6/25/26 at 9:56 am to tide06
quote:
it’s incredibly odd that the media isn’t asking about it directly.
They know where all of this leads. The last thing they want to do right now is draw attention to almost 9-year-old cryptic posts from somebody claiming to be a government insider and almost a decade later, it's born out to be confirmed by multiple cabinet heads and the White House itself.
Page 26 of 45
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News