Started By
Message
locked post

The U. of Washington's model was updated overnight

Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:55 am
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18053 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:55 am
It was better than the Imperial College's half the world is going to die model, but it was still high. More data = better model.

Down from 240k deaths to now projecting 80k.

Mississippi was projected to have 1400 deaths, it has been revised to 237.

LINK

For you non-data geeks, keep in mind that THIS IS THE MODEL THAT WAS PRESENTED L:AST WEEK THAT 240,000 WOULD DIE. Another week of data and the protection dropped by two thirds.

This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 8:14 am
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13969 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:57 am to
quote:

80k

Doubt we get there, either.
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65087 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:57 am to
And after an Alabama Armageddon, they’re projected at 927 by August
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
38970 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:58 am to
25k is my call.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111515 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 7:59 am to
Missouri went from 800 ventilators needed in their March model to 240 needed in their first update to 95 needed in their last update.

Good work, fellas.
Posted by FairhopeTider
Fairhope, Alabama
Member since May 2012
20762 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:00 am to
They brought Alabama’s number down after factoring in our new stay at home order. Nevermind that our previous order was just a strict as states that had shelter-in-place orders. The new order changes nothing and suddenly our numbers are drastically reduced?

Not to go all denier here but that’s a screwed up way to run a model.
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 8:02 am
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6206 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:01 am to
I’m waiting on Vegas oddsmakers.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98730 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Down from 240k deaths to now projecting 80k.


will be lower than that.

SUBSTANTIALLY lower of you take out NYC and NO
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53771 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Down from 240k deaths to now projecting 80k.


still way too high
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56472 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:01 am to
That model is going to make a lot of sky screamers unhappy
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111515 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:02 am to
quote:

Not to go all denier here but that’s a screwed up way to run a model.


Same for Missouri. KC and STL metro areas were stay at home. The model didn’t account for it.
Posted by Eat Your Crow
caught beneath the landslide
Member since May 2017
9190 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:02 am to
Louisiana has already peaked.
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18053 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:02 am to
Stock futures up 800 points on this.
Posted by Enadious
formerly B5Lurker City of Central
Member since Aug 2004
17689 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:02 am to
It also says that it's been 5 days since peak resource use on April 1, 2020, for Louisiana. It also projects 42 deaths on the 6th. I hope UW is correct, but only time will tell.

LINK
click dropdown on United States of America to choose state.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:03 am to
Probably way too high still, my guess is flu+ (give or take).

Nice job guys destroying the world on bullshite.
Posted by TigerMuskyFanMinneso
Boonies, MN
Member since Sep 2019
753 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:04 am to
I am reviewing it right now. I am a data scientist with 50 years pragmatic experience in building and using such models.

My first impression is that while better, the stat's the revision show they are still using averages which give too much reliance on the earliest hospitalized.......THEY ARE ATILL OVER STATING the peak and when it occurs.......

I believe we will see the peak this week, not the 15th ....and at a significantly lower level than being forecast by these models (which have so wide a variance between lower and upper estimates as to be only guides)

This week will be good news in tewrms of peaking!

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34126 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Missouri went from 800 ventilators needed in their March model to 240 needed in their first update to 95 needed in their last update. 

Good work, fellas.


Perhaps the models were simply wrong and that many were really never needed. I know, you believe "social distancing was the "reason" for the decline in the projection. I must say, social distancing is logical.

My take...perhaps the models were wrong AND social distancing helped.
Posted by msudawg1200
Central Mississippi
Member since Jun 2014
9418 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Mississippi was projected to have 1400 deaths, it has been revised to 237.


The update before that had Mississippi at 2,200, then 1,400, now 237. Why the change?
This post was edited on 4/6/20 at 8:06 am
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111515 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:06 am to
quote:

My take...perhaps the models were wrong AND social distancing helped.


I’m on your side. The good work fellas was sarcastically for the model makers.
Posted by stelly1025
Lafayette
Member since May 2012
8509 posts
Posted on 4/6/20 at 8:06 am to
Probably about half that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram