- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Native Americans didn’t believe in or have any concept
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:56 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:56 am to TbirdSpur2010
quote:At least she dresses her Down's twins nicely. She really needs to supervise them more closely though.
The mother of Julian Castro still tries to trot out that San Antonio sits on land "stolen" from Mexico
0
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:57 am to saints5021
quote:
Every group of people that live in any country or territory today conquered another people to get that. Seriously, pick up a fricking history book and just read about any country's history.
Yeah. That's not inconsistent with what I wrote.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 7:59 am to DyeHardDylan
Every person born on American soil is a native American. Why do so many people call one group natives?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:13 am to arcalades
quote:
quote:. It’s really odd. Someone calls you and says, “I need $20” you just give them $20. No questions asked. They dont believe that they own their own money, or houses, or vehicles. It’s like it is all community property.
quote "funny you say that's odd. That's what Christ's kingdom is going to be like.
So, in Christ's Kingdom...the Principle that "he that seweth sparingly shall reap sparingly"...is morally flawed and won't apply?
"The poor will be with you...ALWAYS". For good and Just reason. Just like MLK re "judged not by the color of your skin but the content of your character"...being poor will NOT qualify one for Christ's Kingdom.
It is true that desperation drives people to push the moral envelope, but each person will be judged by an all-knowing Entity...that "knows the heart". There is going to be a ton of 'desperate' people, when High Tech slams their jobs. We will have to 'reinvent' the former and traditional (Darwinian) Capitalist Economic model. But it had damn well better have QUALIFIERS which directly relate to CHARACTER...lest we subsidize character traits that are essentially...evil. Minus those Qualifiers...Mother Nature will handle the culling.
"Behold, there is a way that seemeth right unto Man, but the end thereof is destruction".
Live and learn.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 8:30 am to DyeHardDylan
Indians had zero problem with conquering. Neither did they have any issue with rape, murder, torture, slavery, or general cruelty towards one another. They were a savage backwards people whose only lasting architecture was heaping dirt on top of dirt. Their most creative output was the novel ways they came up with to horrifically torture people. No written language, no progress, and stuck in the Stone Age (except for a handful only beginning to hammer copper out of rocks). Today they are derelicts and drunks.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:15 am to DyeHardDylan
Property rights was an alien concept to them. They demanded "seashells" and other worthless trinkets for the "land". They were INSULTING the Europeans and their property rights mumbo jumbo... and the Europeans obviously didn't get the joke. Europeans killed the Natives to enforce their newfound property rights. Moral of the story: never sign paperwork as a joke.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:20 am to DyeHardDylan
I love the true story of Manhattan.
Tribe X lived there. Tribe X went on a hunting trip a few miles away.
Tribe Z passed through during X's absence and encountered the white settlers.
Settlers: 'Is this your land?'
Tribe Z: 'Uh, why yes. Yes it is.'
Settlers: 'We'll buy it from you.'
Tribe Z: 'Excellent. We accept the deal.'
Then tribe X returned home and encountered the white settlers.
Tribe X: 'WTF are you doing here?'
Settlers: 'We bought this place from ya'll last week.'
Tribe X: 'That wasn't us. It must have been those assholes from Tribe Z.'
Settlers: 'Sorry, but ya'll all look alike.'
Tribe X lived there. Tribe X went on a hunting trip a few miles away.
Tribe Z passed through during X's absence and encountered the white settlers.
Settlers: 'Is this your land?'
Tribe Z: 'Uh, why yes. Yes it is.'
Settlers: 'We'll buy it from you.'
Tribe Z: 'Excellent. We accept the deal.'
Then tribe X returned home and encountered the white settlers.
Tribe X: 'WTF are you doing here?'
Settlers: 'We bought this place from ya'll last week.'
Tribe X: 'That wasn't us. It must have been those assholes from Tribe Z.'
Settlers: 'Sorry, but ya'll all look alike.'
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:20 am to DyeHardDylan
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:22 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
The Native Americans didn’t believe in or have any concept
Of property rights, so I don’t feel bad for them that “their” land was taken. If Columbus had not existed, someone else would have come along and taken it. All this faux outrage and virtue signaling is so over the top.
Plus, they enslaved each other.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:55 am to DyeHardDylan
You are just plain dumb. The Native Americans went to war to protect their Tribal Lands.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 9:59 am to DyeHardDylan
The people that were here when Europeans arrived weren't native Americans
They replaced the people who replaced the people who replaced the people....... Who were native...... And THOSE natives......... Were migrants
They replaced the people who replaced the people who replaced the people....... Who were native...... And THOSE natives......... Were migrants
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:01 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They didn't have land for the most part. Many were nomadic
Not true. There were in the past large settlements of NA's from the NE to South America.
The "nomad" did not really express itself in full form until the Spanish mustang showed up and drastically changed the native culture west of the Mississippi.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:01 am to DyeHardDylan
Foes the word Baton Rouge mean anything to you? Indian understood property rights as well as hunting grounds!
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:04 am to DyeHardDylan
Must believe ALL victims.
Looks like Solutrean man was first there and may have been eradicated by Asian savages.
See this is sooooooo easy.
Looks like Solutrean man was first there and may have been eradicated by Asian savages.
See this is sooooooo easy.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:06 am to DyeHardDylan
NA's waged endless war over lands for centuries before whitey arrived. Why was NA conquest pure, but European conquest not? At what snapshot moment in history should we establish ownership?
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:13 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Why was NA conquest pure
Additionally, tell Greenpeace or Sierra Club that Native American invasion was pure.
These loons will tell you thst the land belongEd to:
California Mud Minnows
Polar bears
Piping plovers
Elm trees.
This has to be addressed by all leftist loons. Who owned the land?
Animals?
Trees?
Siberian invaders?
Solutrean whiteys?
This post was edited on 10/15/19 at 10:15 am
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:13 am to Vacherie Saint
You really don't hear the NA's complaining about losing the wars with the whites.
What you will hear in earnest is the lies and cheating directed at them via the broken treaties and promises in the aftermath.
Its pie in the sky libs who have not a clue and not the NA.
What you will hear in earnest is the lies and cheating directed at them via the broken treaties and promises in the aftermath.
Its pie in the sky libs who have not a clue and not the NA.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:31 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
All this faux outrage and virtue signaling is so over the top.
Exactly. I don't see any of them of them leaving America or giving their houses/land to Indians.
Posted on 10/15/19 at 10:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
There absolutely was property before the white man showed up. however, it was basically joint ownership when it came to land. The Tribe owned the land, not individuals.
Personal items were "owned" by Indians.
Personal items were "owned" by Indians.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News