- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The National Archives Says The U.S. Constitution Has ‘Harmful Language’
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:25 pm to Jjdoc
I read the link. I can't find the word that is offensive.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:26 pm to Jjdoc
I'm sure it is the slavery language
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:26 pm to Jjdoc
We were warned they are after the country. The new age of knowledge has taken over real history and the documents that are the back bone of our nation.
To the Left I proudly say Happy Fourth of July. If you want my country come take it from my cold dead hands. That is your charge. I am charged with defending my nation.
To the Left I proudly say Happy Fourth of July. If you want my country come take it from my cold dead hands. That is your charge. I am charged with defending my nation.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:27 pm to Jjdoc
I wonder how many other countries have a harmful language warning above documents that helped established the founding of their nation.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:28 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
We're only after the Confederate flag
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
There is no slavery language other to outlaw it, do you find the outlawing of slavery offensive?
Posted on 7/2/22 at 3:32 pm to Zach
quote:
I read the link. I can't find the word that is offensive.
That's because YOU might be "offensive", Z, to the folk who are offended re the Constitution. I'll go out on a limb and speculate that the word "God" is a problem for a lot of folks. Not to mention the idea that the very BASIS of Constitutional Principle is that "inalienable Rights" come from God and cannot be abridged by any majority government or group of people.
Happy Fourth Bro. Don't get too hot out there whacking at that ball.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:17 pm to Jjdoc
quote:
insure domestic Tranquility,
Maybe it is harmful to certain segments of society if they cannot upset the domestic tranquility in order to force weak-willed politicians into caving to their demands.
BUT - I am even more upset that I never noticed the misuse of the word insure..
to "insure," relates to monetary compensation for a loss covered by the contract with the agency.
What is meant is "ensure," which means to "make it happen."
on second thought, perhaps 'the upset' are mad that damage from their riots may be 'insured' so that no harm is really done - and that means their upsetting the domestic tranquility would not work so well.
This post was edited on 7/2/22 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:18 pm to Jjdoc
Don't do it NA! Don't pull that 'Woke' sh** and mess with that Sacred Document.
Don't do it.
Don't do it.
This post was edited on 7/2/22 at 4:20 pm
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:20 pm to Zach
quote:
I read the link. I can't find the word that is offensive
It's not a word it's a phrase.
"The right of the people" is harmful language to left agendas.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:22 pm to Jjdoc
The left is trying to nullify the Constitution. This is just the latest attack on it, and it is coming from within.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:23 pm to Rip Torn
quote:
There is no slavery language other to outlaw it
quote:
Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.
The words are still on the paper. History doesn't have a redaction tool.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes but if you delve deeper into it and allow for the the context of the times, it's actually quite a beautiful, foresightful and compassionate document.
With far less effort we could have worked to deliver that context and educate about the abolitionist streak within nearly all founders. They were among the first in the entire world to conjure a potential end to African slavery.
Instead the modern left did what they do best - work to tear down and destroy instead of to buttress and contribute
With far less effort we could have worked to deliver that context and educate about the abolitionist streak within nearly all founders. They were among the first in the entire world to conjure a potential end to African slavery.
Instead the modern left did what they do best - work to tear down and destroy instead of to buttress and contribute
This post was edited on 7/2/22 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:26 pm to Stealth Matrix
quote:
We're only after the Confederate flag
We're only want same sex marriage. Slopes can become slippery.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:27 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Yes but if you delve deeper into it and allow for the the context of the times, it's actually quite a beautiful, foresightful and compassionate document.
I'm not triggered by the Constitution.
This isn't some conspiracy about attacking our rights or anything of the worst. This is simply about the references to slaves.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:32 pm to SirWinston
They will propose to abolish the Constitution in the near future.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 4:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
The slaves were most likely not considered citizens by any Colony. This was quite a concession to allow any sort of voting percentage for representation.
I believe that to be the context of what is written.
I believe that to be the context of what is written.
Posted on 7/2/22 at 5:15 pm to Jjdoc
Yeah, it has the F word and the communists hate it. “FREEDOM”.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News