- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Medium income Amercan Family now earns 1/2 the income needed to buy the avg home.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:19 am to thunderbird1100
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:19 am to thunderbird1100
quote:Nah, what's stupid is to be unburdened by facts, then scream about "boomers" as if you're going to gain empathy.
This isnt hard to recognize the fact housing is just currently in a very unaffordable state for most, and that's sad. This used to be an American dream and its turned into an American nightmare for most at this point. Simply put. The solution to this isnt just boomer yell at everyone "well go live in the sticks and drive 3 hours a day to and from work". Thats just stupid.
It isn't hard to recognize the fact ... that Gen Z has homeownership rates than both millennials and Gen X'ers when they were the same age. That sort of spills the water out of your bucket. So if someone is yelling at you, you may find it's a "GenZ yell."
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:19 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Maybe not where you want to be. 10K a month would allow a 4K payment.
Except they wouldn't take home anything close to $10K/month. After taxes and insurance, that's probably more like $7500/month.
Maybe it's just me, but using over half of your monthly disposable income on a mortgage payment is not a very smart idea.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 11:21 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:20 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
Bought my current house and 54 acres in 2011 for 280K. Bought the 40 that joined me a couple years later for 120K. Just looked on Realtor dot com. Can get a 5000 sq ft home built in 1985 on 7.5 acres for $489,900. Probably dated and needs work. Can get a 1500 sq ft on 1.5 acres built in 1991 for $165,000. This is farming country
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:21 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Maybe not where you want to be. 10K a month would allow a 4K payment. At 6% you can buy a 840K home. That's a REAL nice home in a rural area. Again, sacrifices.
This tells me all I need to know about your math skills.
You think someone making $10k/mo after tax can afford a $840k home right now?
Tell me you suck at math without telling me
Hint - at current 30 year rates which sit about 6.65% on average, assuming you can put down a massive $168k down payment (20% of $840k), your mortgage alone would be about $4.3k/mo. This is BEFORE property tax, insurance, or anything else related to the house. That's easily 50% probably of their income
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 11:24 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:23 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:In 2023, the median annual income for full-time, year-round workers in the US was $61,440.
Median Income = $40k
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:26 am to NC_Tigah
That’s fair enough, I was just going on absolute median
60k doesn’t change the fact that a median income prohibits homeownership. There is not enough take home pay to purchase a $250k house, which is very much a starter home in this market
60k doesn’t change the fact that a median income prohibits homeownership. There is not enough take home pay to purchase a $250k house, which is very much a starter home in this market
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Nah, what's stupid is to be unburdened by facts, then scream about "boomers" as if you're going to gain empathy.
Some of you are so beyond repair. Nobody is looking for "empathy" jackholes, just stating actual facts.
Housing is terribly expensive as it sits right now, and hopefully it doesnt stay this way for long because all it will do is cause less and less home ownership as generations move along. Again, American dream and all...
Apparently some think the american dream is to buy a house in middle of nowhere and commute 3 hours a day. Again, not the case
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:36 am to thunderbird1100
Without any assistance from parents I think a household would need to currently be top 5% earner worldwide to realistically afford a house + save money today in a major US city.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:38 am to GeauxBurrow312
quote:A starter home is how you define it.
That’s fair enough, I was just going on absolute median
60k doesn’t change the fact that a median income prohibits homeownership. There is not enough take home pay to purchase a $250k house, which is very much a starter home in this market
You say $250k is a starter home. Our 5th address and 2nd home is $249K right now on Zillow. Our starter would be nowhere near that, if it hadn't been torn down. In fact, to bring that point home (pun intended) 3 of our first 4 starter addresses were demo'd within a few years of our residence.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:38 am to RollTide4547
quote:
Sounds to me like you can't have what you want
And once again you couldnt be more wrong. Our household income last year would put us well into the top 10% nationally. We both make six figures of income. We can absolutely afford nice things like a 3rd fun vehicle, going out to eat often, some nice trips and still have the ability to save/invest 25-30% of our income no issue year over year.
It just doesnt take an intelligent person to recognize the fact home affordability in general has gone to absolute sh*t the last few years and its all due to housing prices going insane along with higher interest rates. Again, $300k house at 2-3% rates in 2020-2021 going for 50% more than that just last year at 7% rates. All from many years of us not building ENOUGH decent housing to boot. New stuff is almost always "luxury" nowadays and has been for far too long. Lots of dumb zoning issues everywhere, etc...I've seen countless of our friends have their mortgages double or more than double simply moving to a slight step up in house in the past few years. Can you imagine your housing costs doubling overnight? Oh on top of that you have to pay for things like child care as well?
That's great if you love to live the rural life and spend hours in your vehicle every day, this is not a quality of life many are going to choose to live (or will be forced into living so you get some sort of weird satisfaction out of a couple who makes $150k/yr suddenly moves in next to you and said they were "forced" into doing that because living somewhere else in civilization was not really affordable to them).
quote:
If they want it bad enough, they'll sacrifice.
It's easy for us with higher incomes to sacrifice some in areas. For the median or 60-70% decent income in metro areas though its basically completely unaffordable all of sudden to buy any type of decent housing and those are the people that suffer the most and sucks for them. I dont think you're going to suddenly see 5 million metro atlantans park it in Breman GA to afford housing, either.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:39 am to thunderbird1100
quote:I was talking principal and interest, since there is no way of knowing the locality of anyone else. My numbers were spot on. I'll match my math skills with you anyday.
Hint - at current 30 year rates which sit about 6.65% on average, assuming you can put down a massive $168k down payment (20% of $840k), your mortgage alone would be about $4.3k/mo. This is BEFORE property tax, insurance, or anything else related to the house. That's easily 50% probably of their income
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:40 am to thunderbird1100
Telling people to live in the middle of nowhere doesnt even save them as much as you would think due to the additional commuting costs, which are not tax deductible.
Now, if their job could be done remote then yes the cost savings make more sense.. but the same people saying go live 70+ miles from your office are the ones who think RTO should be mandatory
Just a stream of "I got mine, frick you"
If the US is to survive the birth rate decline, COL needs to come down. People who can barely afford to live their own life reasonably do not want to add in the costs of raising kids
Now, if their job could be done remote then yes the cost savings make more sense.. but the same people saying go live 70+ miles from your office are the ones who think RTO should be mandatory
Just a stream of "I got mine, frick you"
If the US is to survive the birth rate decline, COL needs to come down. People who can barely afford to live their own life reasonably do not want to add in the costs of raising kids
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:40 am to thunderbird1100
quote:Tell it to GenZ .... just stating actual facts.
all it will do is cause less and less home ownership as generations move along.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:41 am to thunderbird1100
quote:Then don't move or change careers. Do the same thing you've always done and complain. It's the cards you've been dealt. Play 'em or fold 'em.
thunderbird1100
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:44 am to VADawg
quote:If you've ever bought a house, you know that the mortgage company looks at gross income.
Except they wouldn't take home anything close to $10K/month.
quote:Not saying it's a good idea, I'm saying it is possible if you make sacrifices.
Maybe it's just me, but using over half of your monthly disposable income on a mortgage payment is not a very smart idea.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:45 am to thunderbird1100
quote:
Our household income last year would put us well into the top 10% nationally. We both make six figures of income. We can absolutely afford nice things like a 3rd fun vehicle, going out to eat often, some nice trips and still have the ability to save/invest 25-30% of our income no issue year over year.
Dang, all that and you still can’t afford to upgrade from the starter home with pool/tennis and immaculate landscaping.
Sounds rough.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:45 am to RollTide4547
quote:
I was talking principal and interest,
Ok, so on what planet do you think paying 43% of your after tax pay on your mortgage NOT including taxes/insurance is a good or sound idea?
Hint - any financial guru out there would laugh at that ratio, by the way, especially without any other housing costs oyu have to pay on top of the mortgage. That's a "you're very house poor" ratio there
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:46 am to RollTide4547
Its a societal issue, not a individual one. If someone is whining about their personal circumstance, yeah they need to do something about it. But at the end of the day, there are not enough higher paying jobs out there where everyone could do that. The current market is such that only the top ~20-25% of households can afford to own a home
Its not healthy for society if 70% of the population is financially fricked
Its not healthy for society if 70% of the population is financially fricked
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 11:48 am
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:47 am to thunderbird1100
quote:Right. So your concern would be for folks who just landed jobs in the past three to four years? Because obviously owners in the market prior to 2022 are riding that wave.
home affordability in general has gone to absolute sh*t the last few years and its all due to housing prices going insane along with higher interest rates. Again, $300k house at 2-3% rates in 2020-2021 going for 50% more than that just last year at 7% rates.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 11:47 am to Eric Nies Grind Time
quote:
be top 5% earner worldwide
You’re going to want to reword this. ~$60,000 for a two person household, ~$35,000 for a single person household (post tax), puts you in the top 5% of worldwide earners.
To be in the top 5% of earners for the US, you need around $330k in wages annually.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 11:48 am
Popular
Back to top



1





