- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The media is freaking out over the three million illegally voted comments
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:10 pm to Salmon
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:10 pm to Salmon
quote:
I have no doubt in my mind that illegals vote
This should be an outrage to even the BamaSJW types.
But, it isn't. I wonder why. Wait, I know why...
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:10 pm to themunch
It is an idiotic charge (3-5 million illegal voters in 2016) and most sane people recognize it as such. But Trump's "Ministry of Propaganda" continues with the big lie.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:11 pm to GRTiger
Hang in there, little guy.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:12 pm to Old Hellen Yeller
When you include dead people the number is closer to 8 million illegal votes.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:12 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Thats because our Commander in Chief is a stupid liar that lies for no reason.
No. That guy left a few days ago.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:14 pm to Salmon
I would agree with that for sure, as that is what they do, focus on what is not necessarily the issue, but derail it to some other issue and not that the claim of illegals voting actually happened and has happened before.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:14 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
Thats because our Commander in Chief is a stupid liar that lies for no reason.
So your solution was to vote for Hillary?

This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:16 pm to themunch
quote:
focus on what is not necessarily the issue,
well I could say the same for Trump
why he is concerned about this...he won
just point to the scoreboard
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:17 pm to ApexTiger
Questioning whether 3 million people illegally voted is like questioning whether 10 million people will break a traffic law on the way home today. There's no need to waste time proving such foregone conclusions.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:17 pm to Salmon
quote:
no idea why that triggers some of you all so much
Im not triggered at all.
too busy winning.
just stating that it happened and its a fact. I don't need an exact number. 1 would be too many IMO.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:17 pm to Lsuchs
quote:
How about trump just say "what difference does it even make" when confronted with a "lie." Would that make you feel better?
well...Trump did do this with the taxes
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:18 pm to Salmon
Did he lie? Or decline to show them
Hillary was proven to be a bald face liar and didn't even GAF. The left thinks trump is similar and hold it against him but not her.
Can we just stop pretending this whole thing is about anything more than political preference, there is no moral high ground here.
Hillary was proven to be a bald face liar and didn't even GAF. The left thinks trump is similar and hold it against him but not her.
Can we just stop pretending this whole thing is about anything more than political preference, there is no moral high ground here.
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:19 pm to Salmon
quote:
where did the 3 mil number come from?
It´s an off the cuff extrapolation.
Using 2008 voting percentage, and using 2015 ´census´, you could make a solid point for the floor being at slightly under 2M.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:20 pm to Lsuchs
he said he would show them when the audit was done
but now that he won he basically said "what difference does it make" because he won and nobody cares
so yeah...he lied
I don't care, just thought it was funny that you used that as an example
but now that he won he basically said "what difference does it make" because he won and nobody cares
so yeah...he lied
I don't care, just thought it was funny that you used that as an example
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:21 pm to Salmon
quote:
in that regard, it doesn't matter
all I'm saying is that thequote:
media is going to ask where you get a number from when you state a specific number
quote:
well I could say the same for Trump
wquote:...he won
hy he is concerned about this
just point to the scoreboard
You are getting close. You have a pretty good perception most of the time, but I think you are missing the point here in my opinion. Is it dumb? Yes. But it's effective. I think it is all just a distraction. I've heard a lot this week about what Trump has claimed, but very little from the MSM about what he has been doing.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:23 pm to Salmon
Funny?
I didn't defend trump, I used an example of Hillary being a liar.
You brought up the tax example which I didn't defend, I simply asked if he lied.
Edit: originally I did use an example of if trump said "what difference did it make" before editing to that picture of Hillary. You are correct in that.
Point still stands that in the end it's all about political preference, we have (on both sides) a double standard in how we attacked the candidates. Cruiserhog hates trump because of his policies not because he is a "liar," if that weren't the case how could he justify voting for Hillary. Yes you could say similar about my stance towards Hillary
I didn't defend trump, I used an example of Hillary being a liar.
You brought up the tax example which I didn't defend, I simply asked if he lied.
Edit: originally I did use an example of if trump said "what difference did it make" before editing to that picture of Hillary. You are correct in that.
Point still stands that in the end it's all about political preference, we have (on both sides) a double standard in how we attacked the candidates. Cruiserhog hates trump because of his policies not because he is a "liar," if that weren't the case how could he justify voting for Hillary. Yes you could say similar about my stance towards Hillary
This post was edited on 1/24/17 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:24 pm to Langston
quote:Is this what we want though? A President making unsupported self-serving claims (to say he win the popular vote) to serve as a distraction, rather than actually focusing on an issue, even the issue at hand based in facts?
But it's effective. I think it is all just a distraction. I
I get it during the campaign, but I thought we were going to get a president who focused on substantive things, not purposeful distractions and conjecture.
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:24 pm to ChEgrad
thank you
wish I could actually read it, but thanks for actually providing a reasonable answer
wish I could actually read it, but thanks for actually providing a reasonable answer
Posted on 1/24/17 at 2:25 pm to mattloc
Thank you for the facts and links. A rare occurrence on this board.
Popular
Back to top


0






