Started By
Message

re: The maga kids vs native american story just got more complicated.

Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:21 am to
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:21 am to
It's fricking wikipedia.

The point is that it's so fricking long ago it doesn't matter. This "native" bullshite is exactly that... bullshite. More manipulation of identity and victimhood to influence the behavior of a group of people.
This post was edited on 1/20/19 at 1:26 am
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35119 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:25 am to
quote:

It's fricking wikipedia.


You’re the one who chose to link wikipedia

quote:

The point is that it's so fricking long ago it doesn't matter. This "native" bullshite is exactly that.


Don’t go moving the goalpost now baw
Posted by SlapahoeTribe
Tiger Nation
Member since Jul 2012
12122 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:31 am to
quote:

quote:

The point is that it's so fricking long ago it doesn't matter. This "native" bullshite is exactly that.
Don’t go moving the goalpost now baw
Doesn't matter... to my point:

-We'll go back to Europe when they go back to NE Asia, or
-We'll go back to Europe when they go back to Europe.

Either way they don't get to stay here on their high horse.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:58 am to
quote:

quote:
It's fricking wikipedia.


You’re the one who chose to link wikipedia


I linked the theory. Wikipedia hasn't been accepted as a reference for over a decade, if ever.

quote:

Don’t go moving the goalpost now baw


Goalposts are cemented. People are people.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 2:07 am to
quote:

Doesn't matter... to my point:

-We'll go back to Europe when they go back to NE Asia, or
-We'll go back to Europe when they go back to Europe.

Either way they don't get to stay here on their high horse.
Why not? They were the first people here. "We" were second, third, fourth, whatever. And now people are trying to come here after us, and you don't want them here either, right?

If not the first settlers, then which group should have the most right to the land?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 2:08 am to
quote:

telling them "white people go back to europe'
That's just his idea of MAGA.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25584 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:07 am to
quote:

Why not? They were the first people here. "We" were second, third, fourth, whatever. And now people are trying to come here after us, and you don't want them here either, right? If not the first settlers, then which group should have the most right to the land?


They should have built a wall and an army. To the victor goes the spoils. We were living in an imperial world and we were an imperial girl. We showed injuns our knuckles baw. Because of that you have a global platform to virtue signal about how 400 years ago White Man Bad.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:25 am to
Another fricking leftist lie

I am shocked
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42819 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:37 am to
quote:

quote:
White people from Europe showed up here long before any from NE Asia.
=====

Bering Strait Land Bridge my man-


There is lots of evidence that people from Western Europe were here before the bering strait people arrived.

The well known "clovis point' has its first appearance in the Virginia area and is a dead ringer for arrow head design in use in the Atlantic coast of Europe. in an era prior to the 12000 bc version of the Clovis point found in New Mexico.

Big question is what happened to the Clovis point people who lived in the Virginia area. - Severe climate change is the primary culprit - seems like global warming to me - too many campfires. .
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42819 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:42 am to
quote:

If not the first settlers, then which group should have the most right to the land?


No people have a 'right' to the land - or anything else - that they cannot defend.

In the evolution of mankind conquest is the primary thrust of human expansion into new areas.

This notion of "empires bad" is the most ignorant bullshite of all time and could only take hold in a population who is woefully ignorant and susceptible to being brain washed to think that the concept of morality was born with them.

You are pissing into the wind - and blaming the wind.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:49 am to
Amazing how some people believe in survival of the fittest until they don’t believe in it.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42819 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:55 am to
quote:

quote:
Few if any archaeologists—or, for that matter, geneticists, linguists, or physical anthropologists—take seriously the idea of a Solutrean colonization of America."[7] The evidence for the hypothesis is considered more consistent with other scenarios. In addition to an interval of thousands of years between the Clovis and Solutrean eras, the two technologies show only incidental similarities. There is no evidence for any Solutrean seafaring, far less for any technology that could take humans across the Atlantic in an ice age. Recent genetic evidence supports the idea of Asian, not European, origins for the peopling of the Americas

=======
Ooph literally your entire link just explains why the theory is bullshite


I have kept up with this theory for a number of years now, since I first became aware of it on the History/Science channels some time back.

In my recollection these peoples were not 'sea-faring' at all. They were coastal fishermen who just kept foraging farther and farther westward along the seashore created by the various ice ages. Just continue to creep westward until they eventually arrived in North America and then were stranded by the sea level rise at the end of the ice ages.

They were incapable of 'sea-faring' their way back to Europe - even if the concept of 'europe' still existed after the 10s of thousands of year since their ancestral departure.

This original culture was completely destroyed by the invaders from Asia.
This post was edited on 1/20/19 at 5:57 am
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57794 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:56 am to
Shocker. More fabricated nonsense by the left.

Posted by The Great McGinty
Member since Jan 2017
1384 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:00 am to
I actually seen a theory that Ive never heard purposed about human life originating in the Americas. It is speculated that all of the continental land masses were joined together in what we know as Pangaea. It purposed that Atlantis was located on what is now parts of North America and that Native Americans are decendants of Atlantians as well as descendants of the first humans. The theory supports Plato’s claims about Atlantis as well as how modern civilization came to be and where we are headed. I found it very interesting and it is further proof that we have been mislead about how the world as we know it came to be. I understand that it is just a theory but it made me have questions about what I previously thought was facts on human existence.

The Hidden History of Humanity
Posted by fjlee90
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
7857 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:20 am to
What saddens me is that one day there will be some knob gobbler honkey spouting actual racism and all this wolf crying diminishes it.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
28595 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:23 am to
All the stupid fricks in the other thread.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140729 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:24 am to
In case anyone missed this from rockchalktiger in the other thread....an actual racist.

quote:

Yeah, it cut out the kids mocking them with the FSU/Chiefs chant. Racists gonna racist.
"Build the Wall" indeed. Keep the ignorant white people in Europe!


New Black Panther Party member# NPC564321
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21804 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:26 am to
quote:

If not the first settlers, then which group should have the most right to the land?


"the land"?

So if one person sets foot on North America they just get the whole thing to themselves?

When the Europeans arrived America was mostly unsettled. You can cling to that all you want, but it still leaves 95% of America wide open for other people to settle.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24919 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:27 am to
quote:

knob gobbler honkey spouting actual racism










Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
12035 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Ooph literally your entire link just explains why the theory is bull shite



How can you put much credibility in any of those "facts" after the fiasco by the Clinton Administration when those ancient Caucasian bones were found on an Indian reservation, he refused permission to have them studied.
Politics vs Science aren't compatible with truth.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram