Started By
Message

re: The left keep pushing back with rape and mother's life arguments

Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:14 am to
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29133 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:14 am to
quote:



They want the baby to be born, but after that don’t care really that the baby goes into foster care or an absolutely awful home. And don’t you dare think about higher taxes to support these additional babies being born.



because most foster foundations, private hospitals, and orphanages were founded by liberal atheists?




eta: that was probably too snarky. you're making fair good faith arguments and it was unmerited on my part. i'll apologize. i'll leave it to let my hypocrisy show.


in a more earnest response, i said earlier i've become more liberal in my welfare views as i've gotten older. i'm not in favor of it, don't vote for people that want to expand welfare, and i think it's wildly abused, but i'm less in anger over my taxes possibly feeding people in community and keeping a roof over their head than i am for foreign wars or keeping the UN running and funding gender studies in Pakistan.

i think you make a false equivalency. because i don't want somebody murdered in the womb or in their home, does not mean that Joe Taxpayer should be on the hook for the rest of their lives. i equate that to saying that "i'm more noble than you because i voted for the guy that wanted to tax you more to fund welfare projects."

i was in the Rio Grande Valley this week all around where SpaceX is set up. Brought Elon up a few times to our customers. Most have a favorable view of him, but one guy got pissy at him wasting billions of dollars on twitter and not giving more to the community.

Elon also just gave $10mm to that same guy's school system.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 10:27 am
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14745 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

They want the baby to be born, but after that don’t care really that the baby goes into foster care or an absolutely awful home. And don’t you dare think about higher taxes to support these additional babies being born.

It’s emotion and hypocrisy to me with abortion, on both sides. It’s why I’m tired of it being such a big ticket item


Every word of this is the truth.

Abortion isn't even on a check off list for me when it comes to voting.
Posted by the_truman_shitshow
Member since Aug 2021
2755 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:16 am to
quote:

The issue is that this line isn't clear. But the day after certainly is on the "not a child" point of the line.


If the line isn't clear, then will it be clearer after 9 months?

Isn't it ironic that people purchase life insurance because of a low probability of death. Yet when it comes to abortion, they pay to have a fetus terminated with a high probability of life.

Just let that sink in.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 10:32 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:27 am to
quote:

When women are actually raped, it’s pretty freaking emotional and embarassing
The keyword being "actually" raped.
quote:

This is so fricking dumb.
Negative. What is so f*cking dumb is #IBelieveHer aka #HesGuiltyUntilProvenInnocent.

E.g.,
The Athens Ohio ATM Rape


This post was edited on 5/27/22 at 9:36 am
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
22209 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:31 am to
quote:

Negative. What is so fricking dumb is #IBelieveHer aka #HesGuiltyUntilProvenInnocent.


Compounded with that damned "Dear Colleague" letter from the Halfrican's administration.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Folks are seven times more likely to avoid adopting a black baby than a non-black baby.
That is FALSE ... unless of course one artificially employs a 100% Caucasian Adoptive parent pool as the basis.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 10:40 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Go ahead and deflect and pretend to not the get point dipshit.
Unless your point is promotion of stereotypic misandry, you have no point, dipshit.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 10:55 am to
quote:

But you are saying you want to force a woman to carry full term a baby she had no consent over, even if she could terminate it when it was just an embryo.
I don't consider the natural act of pregnancy and birth to be a "forced" process. I consider the situation a prevention of taking an innocent life, instead, but that's just a different perspective on what is occurring.

The real issue at stake here is whether or not the child is a living human being, and if so, if it has the general right to live. If it is a living human being, and it does have a general right to live, then the questions are whether or not there are exceptions to that rule, and what are they?

We deal with exceptions to the general right to life with adults all the time. We discuss whether or not self-defense is a valid excuse to take a life. We talk about the taking of life in instances of war. We especially talk about taking life as a punitive action against certain crimes within society. What we don't talk much about is the emotional reason to take a life that doesn't involve those other three scenarios, because we generally agree that killing someone because you're angry or upset is not a valid reason, and yet this is the lens that we use to approach abortion in the case of rape.

quote:

It isn’t emotional, it’s just true. If you are against all abortion, you are for woman carry rapist babies, and women carrying babies that will kill them

That isn’t emotional, it’s facts. If your belief in banning all abortions is strong, you need to accept that and own it
First of all, that isn't my position, as I don't agree that all abortions should be illegal, though I'd phrase that a little differently. I believe that abortion for the cases of incest and rape should not be allowed, but I do think that medical procedures that are performed to save the life of the mother that result in the death of the child should be allowed if that's what the mother wants. That isn't exactly the same as "abortion to save the life of the mother", but the result is the same. Rarely does a doctor have to kill the baby to save the life of the mother. Usually it's that the baby is removed from the mother, resulting in its death. Again, same result, but different emphasis.

Secondly, it is an emotional argument because it removes the objectivity of the situation and places it entirely on the subjective emotional state of the mother. Instead of the emphasis being on the objective value of the child as a living human being, the emphasis is placed on the subjective feelings of the mother (and/or the subjective feelings of others involved, such as parents who wouldn't want to see their daughter suffer emotionally). As others point out, that argument can be extended to harsher extremes. For instance, what about if the mother is raped, conceives a child, and believes she should not abort it while pregnant, but after the birth the trauma doesn't go away but only increases as she looks at her child every day and sees the face of the rapist? Should she be able to kill that child at 6 weeks old? 1 year? 3 years? When you make "emotional trauma" the deciding factor in whether or not someone lives or dies, that can have disastrous results.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
16143 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:01 am to
quote:

This is an equally horrible argument. It happens to THOUSANDS of women. So, you absolutely have to account for the situation. So your answer is let these women die becuase “it’s a minority of abortions”?


In the same way that we should account for people dying in car accidents. Sure not everyone gets into one, but because some do we must ban all vehicles.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:02 am to
quote:

What you know about women in general and taking care of a sexual trauma victim couldn't fill a thimble. Honestly, it couldn't. Every single thing about being raped is emotional. All of it. 100% of it. There's nothing "logical or rational" about the act of it or its outcome.

To deny a woman an abortion after a rape is Ozark snake handling level shite. That's how primitive and ridiculous you are. And people like you are just as dangerous to the freedoms of this country as the far left.

You're a fool.
The fool is the one who is ruled by his or her emotions.

Yes, rape is emotional. I'm not denying that it isn't evil. In fact, I believe rapists should be put to death. But, we aren't talking about the rape. We're talking about taking another person's life because of the emotion associated with the rape.

I don't think we should take the lives of the innocent to punish the guilty, nor should we take the lives of innocents in order to console victims of crimes, and me saying that isn't minimizing the pain of the victim of rape or saying that doesn't matter. I'm just saying that killing a child isn't an appropriate response to that pain.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:02 am to
They use outliers as examples on their arguments because they can’t really argue the middle.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:06 am to
quote:

The chief reason even non-violent rape is punished so severely is the emotional toll it takes on the victim. In some instances the toll can be so overbearing as to permanently alter intimacy. Now extrapolate that to an entire pregnancy which in rare instances could additionally cost the mother her future fertility, or even her life. It is not an emotional argument, but rather a factually scientific one
If you want to argue that abortion should occur due to physical health, then make that argument, but the "emotional trauma" argument is one I don't buy when it comes to taking the lives of innocents. That isn't to say that emotional trauma is of no consequence, but the bar to take innocent life is pretty high, and being emotionally compromised is not a sufficient reason to take life in other circumstances, and I don't think that's a valid reason to do so in this case, either.

Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3676 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

but in the interest of fairness and compromise, I'd be willing to allow it in the instance of rape and incest or to save the life of the mother. hell, just to throw a bone, I'll say it's fine in the first trimester.


Thank you! it's funny because I went to bed with this question in my head last night--"why is the right so absolute with this abortion thing?" and woke up to find an entire thread on this topic-- but glad to see there are reasonable ppl on your side of the aisle.

I truly hope both sides comprise and agree on these exact abortion parameters as I believe it covers and satisfies most of the issues.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124712 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:30 am to
quote:

If you want to argue that abortion should occur due to physical health, then make that argument, but the "emotional trauma" argument is one I don't buy
Then you don't buy life in prison for rape either. Because there is no other justification for differential penalties afforded rape vs other 'assaults'. Then again, psychiatry is as real as oncology when it comes to suicidal depression
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29133 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Thank you! it's funny because I went to bed with this question in my head last night--"why is the right so absolute with this abortion thing?" and woke up to find an entire thread on this topic-- but glad to see there are reasonable ppl on your side of the aisle


FTR, I don’t agree with what I posted. I meant it as a litmus test. I mean if that’s a compromise the left could agree with, then sure. Acceptable terms from me if I were in charge. My point is that is not agreeable for the majority of the left.

That has been the standard for decades and it was left alone. Most blue states have enshrined abortion up to the third trimester. birth canal, or post-birth.

If you could agree with the above, then cool, we at least have some common ground. We don’t agree but we have something to start with.

If you don’t and want me to give up more , then I think we’re arguing two different things, as this thread has indicated.

despite the hypotheticals above, if I were supreme dictator, I wouldn’t make abortion illegal. It’s just casting us into a further us v. them.

I would more likely tackle the root issue, which is rape and the misuse and abuse of casual sex.
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 11:44 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41870 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Then you don't buy life in prison for rape either. Because there is no other justification for differential penalties afforded rape vs other 'assaults'.
I believe rape to be a severe and violent violation of the dignity of a person made in the image of God, much more so than mere physical, external abuse defined as "assault". It can result in unwanted pregnancy and STDs on top of the physical and emotional trauma that it inflicts on the victim. It's very, very serious, which is why I support harsh sentencing for the perpetrator.

What I don't support is creating two victims instead of one.

quote:

Then again, psychiatry is as real as oncology when it comes to suicidal depression
Perhaps, but I'm not disputing the reality of emotional trauma. I'm merely saying that it doesn't rise to the level of taking an innocent life.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96778 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:46 am to
quote:

They use outliers as examples on their arguments because they can’t really argue the middle.
Killings by guns as an act of self defense is a fraction of a percent of all gun deaths. It’s an extreme outlier, but rightfully we have carved it out in our law to allow it

Outliers absolutely need to be considered if you want to make banning ALL abortions a law

Allowing someone to kill someone in self defense, but not allowing an abortion when the fetus is killing the mother, is peak mental gymnastics
This post was edited on 5/5/22 at 11:48 am
Posted by tommy2tone1999
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6848 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:53 am to
quote:

This board completely minimizes the incredible trauma associated with rape.

Creating policy that punishes the victim of rape further is fricked up. If that policy criminalizes rational steps taken soon after the rape, it ventures into insanity.


Explain how killing the innocent child makes the trauma of rape disappear. I'll take it a step further, explain how the death of an innocent child that the mother is carrying will not add further trauma to her fragile state of mind.
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53821 posts
Posted on 5/5/22 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Those account for way less than 1% of abortions.


it this true? I was thinking maybe 5-10%
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram