- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Fauci's had a sweet, profitable gig...while it lasted.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:45 pm
No conflict of interests and no collusion? Sure, Jan. (And there was no election fraud in 2020, either.) Georgetown university link: LINK
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:48 pm to BFIV
I see she’s Fauci’s wife. I read through half of the page. What are you wanting us to focus on?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:51 pm to BFIV
More profitable than the current regime?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:51 pm to TerryDawg03
She was employed by the NIH, as was her husband, THE Dr. Fauci, before Trump reduced their employee numbers. She was in charge of bio-ethics within the NIH, I believe.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:57 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
More profitable than the current regime?
The current regime made money before becoming "public servants."
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:59 pm to BFIV
quote:
She was in charge of bio-ethics within the NIH, I believe.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 12:59 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
The current regime made money before becoming "public servants."
It's just a simple yes or no.
Yes, just as profitable or no, not as profitable.
This post was edited on 8/9/26 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 8/7/26 at 1:00 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
More profitable than the current regime?
I can see people having issues with Trump but this is Porksammich level stupid.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 1:32 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
The current regime made money before becoming "public servants."
They are making more now than they did as private citizens
Posted on 8/7/26 at 1:55 pm to BFIV
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Roughly 2.5–3.5 billion people, concentrated in high- and upper-middle-income regions were injected with an experimental mRNA product.
Some were coerced, some were put under duress, most did it voluntarily based on the lies and propaganda which these two prayed and sprayed.
A husband and wife team: one is in charge of response to the bioweapon created under his leadership; the other is in charge of ethics of the whole program.
Couldn't make this shite up if you tried.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 2:12 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Roughly 2.5–3.5 billion people, concentrated in high- and upper-middle-income regions were injected with an experimental mRNA product.
And yet I see some many in the medical community support Dr. Fauci. I guess they protect their own and follow the party line.
I'm glad I'm a pure blood.
What I'm trying to understand is why the push for a vaccine in the short term with no long term effects known, for something with 99% survivability rate. Now if it had less than a 90% survivability rate then I could see the push.
Seems reaching heard immunity would have been more natural and better.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 2:13 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
They are making more now than they did as private citizens
Who is they?
Posted on 8/7/26 at 2:17 pm to leeman101
quote:
What I'm trying to understand is why the push for a vaccine in the short term with no long term effects known, for something with 99% survivability rate.
Point this out in 2021 and people would wish death upon you.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:23 pm to Bbobalou
quote:
More profitable than the current regime?
You do realize they are doctors through several republican and democratic "regimes" and are supposed to be civil servants. You **** can't call a spade a spade for the life of you. GTFOH
Posted on 8/7/26 at 3:52 pm to leeman101
quote:
What I'm trying to understand is why the push for a vaccine in the short term with no long term effects known, for something with 99% survivability rate. Now if it had less than a 90% survivability rate then I could see the push.
When they are labeling car accidents and heart attacks as covid deaths because the hospital treating illnesses would receive anywhere from $26,000 to $260,000 per "covid" death, and when the bought and paid for media is peddling constant lies, and when all the liberal owned social media companies are censoring and silencing the truth from getting out, and when you have a nation full of complete fricking idiots, it can be easy to paint common cold having basically a 50/50 survival rate. You can trick a lot of gullible people.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:14 pm to dnm3305
quote:
a nation full of complete fricking idiots
Bitter pill for some.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:44 pm to Bbobalou
You fools always deflect.
How/when did Barry Soetoro become so wealthy?
Dont say books and speaking engagements.
STFU
They are all thieves.
How/when did Barry Soetoro become so wealthy?
Dont say books and speaking engagements.
STFU
They are all thieves.
Posted on 8/7/26 at 4:48 pm to Tigerdew
quote:
They are making more now than they did as private citizens
Who is they?
Yep, who is they?
Popular
Back to top

8






