- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

The Dems made the switch too soon, should have waited longer to replace Biden
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:37 pm
The longer Harris is the candidate, the more she is exposed as the fraud that she is. Hence the reason she is losing ground in the polls.
If the Dems would have waited to replace the candidate elected by its voters (Biden) at the last minute, Kamala would have had a better chance to win.
Thoughts?
If the Dems would have waited to replace the candidate elected by its voters (Biden) at the last minute, Kamala would have had a better chance to win.
Thoughts?
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:38 pm to SEC Doctor
Needed to do it before convention but wouldn’t have mattered.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:38 pm to SEC Doctor
They expected to be running against an assassinated Donald Trump.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:39 pm to SEC Doctor
Doesn’t matter she going to be installed as president anyway
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:39 pm to tigerbait3488
quote:
Needed to do it before convention but wouldn’t have mattered.
Could they not have replaced Biden after the convention by claiming "illness" or "voluntary withdrawal" from the race?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:39 pm to the808bass
quote:
They expected to be running against an assassinated Donald Trump.
They still might be
This post was edited on 10/14/24 at 2:40 pm
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:39 pm to SEC Doctor
Legally they already did switch as late as possible. I believe the exact last day for most states to accept it on their ballots.
Which is why is always was a sham
Which is why is always was a sham
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:40 pm to Pettifogger
I’m sure that would be their preference.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:40 pm to SEC Doctor
After his first debate they knew. Biden will be remembered for being a shitty prez and for “nominating” Harris! Both equally as bad.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:42 pm to SEC Doctor
quote:Nah. They could have chosen wisely and not worried about it, but they didn't. They figured they muscled Biden in, so they could do it with Harris. She even tried the Biden no-interviews, one-rigged-debate bit.
Thoughts?
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:44 pm to the808bass
In all honesty I think they were in a tough spot. I wonder if we start to see more factions become resigned to the reality of a loss (although I'm not confident yet myself).
They knew Biden was a weak candidate. They knew Kamala was similarly weak. Watching the "organic" upswell of support bolstered by wall to wall media praise and reintroduction, likely intentionally skewed polling, etc. was impressive TBH. The way the left and the institutions captured by it operate in lockstep is pretty fascinating.
Honestly I think they did more than we could have expected given her innate lack of accomplishment, intellect and personality. She doesn't connect with anyone and has never accomplished anything of note. She wasn't even a high achiever academically. But they couldn't not give it to the "woman of color already on the ticket" so their hands were tied.
They knew Biden was a weak candidate. They knew Kamala was similarly weak. Watching the "organic" upswell of support bolstered by wall to wall media praise and reintroduction, likely intentionally skewed polling, etc. was impressive TBH. The way the left and the institutions captured by it operate in lockstep is pretty fascinating.
Honestly I think they did more than we could have expected given her innate lack of accomplishment, intellect and personality. She doesn't connect with anyone and has never accomplished anything of note. She wasn't even a high achiever academically. But they couldn't not give it to the "woman of color already on the ticket" so their hands were tied.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:46 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I wonder if we start to see more factions become resigned to the reality of a loss
The braintrust and MSM types already know this.
That's why they went with Kamala. They're just trying to salvage as much downballot with all that money that they can. Biden would kill everything DEM-related.
quote:
Honestly I think they did more than we could have expected given her innate lack of accomplishment, intellect and personality.
Agreed.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:47 pm to SEC Doctor
I guessed your argument was going to be: Three months was too much time for Kamala to fake being competent in public.
And it's true.
And it's true.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:55 pm to SEC Doctor
They actually waited too late. Had they done it in January they would’ve had time to get a better candidate and not have Kamala forced on them on short notice in a panic move.
I do look back at what several pundits said which was the first party to replace their 80 year old candidate will win. The Democrats made the move.
I do look back at what several pundits said which was the first party to replace their 80 year old candidate will win. The Democrats made the move.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:56 pm to SEC Doctor
They usually have a plan for everything they do, if they replaced him early it was on purpose to expose her and get her out of the way before the election. Let’s just see what happens next
Posted on 10/14/24 at 2:57 pm to charliemurphy69
quote:
Doesn’t matter she going to be installed as president anyway
You seem fun.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 3:00 pm to charliemurphy69
quote:
Doesn’t matter she going to be installed as president anyway
Perhaps he’ll get enough to beat the cheat. Perhaps he’ll get enough to make the cheat so ridiculously obvious that this nation will come to a point of having to address the issue or risk being torn apart.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 3:06 pm to Gaston
quote:
You know he’s right.
We'll agree to disagree. It's going to give all appearances of getting worse before it gets better, but there's daylight on the other side of it all.
You're welcome to find out when everyone else does. Enjoy your ulcer.
Posted on 10/14/24 at 3:09 pm to VoxDawg
I’m not even mad. No possible way the three letter agencies let Trump and Elon tear them apart. You can believe that’ll happen…but they are most powerful organizations on the planet.
Popular
Back to top

13









