- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The definitive video showing Good's vehicle striking the agent
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:14 pm to VOR
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:14 pm to VOR
quote:
And I doubt you’ve seen the video from the agent’s cell phone which clearly shows that Good was trying to avoid confrontation
Hilarious to say she was avoiding confrontation when she did nothing but refuse to comply.
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:17 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Agreed. So why have we wasted so many pixels whining about what a horrible person she was?
The 2 ideas go hand in hand
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:19 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
The question is whether his force was measured adequately to her force. If she was intending to kill him then he can justify the shooting
This still isn’t the standard. No matter how much you wish it to be.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:20 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If she was intending to kill him then he can justify the shooting
Intent is irrelevant here too.
quote:
just think the video makes that a tough case to make and any good lawyer can make the case
Any good lawyer would be able to counter such liberal nonsense.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:23 pm to VOR
quote:
And I doubt you’ve seen the video from the agent’s cell phone which clearly shows that Good was trying to avoid confrontation and was turning the wheel away from the agent
Avoiding confrontation by refusing to move her vehicle and telling them to “go around” initially? Avoiding confrontation by her and her wife taunting? Jesus, why do you choose to live in a world of lies?
She’s part of an organization who’s goal IS confrontation with ICE.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:25 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
No, but let's assume that he WAS struck a glancing blow.
The question then becomes:
I'm holding you to your statement about the jury's decision. Like the officer will ever be charged. LOL.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
No level of evidence matters to the Left. She could have stepped out pointing a gun at the agent and they still would say she was murdered.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:31 pm to Clames
That's relentless alter you are talking about.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:32 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Intent is irrelevant
No it’s not
It’s highly relevant
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:39 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Even if it is not your intent to kill with a car, a car can still kill, SO again, intent is irrelevant to the discussion.
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:40 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Ask Darrell Brooks.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:42 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
It doesn’t matter what your intent is for the 3,000,000th time.
The person utilizing deadly force just have to have a reasonable fear that they are going to suffer serious bodily injury.
That’s the legal standard. If you think that’s incorrect, work to change the law.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:51 pm to SlidellCajun
Depends are you following directives?
Is there a person in front of your vehicle when you hit the gas?
Is there a person in front of your vehicle when you hit the gas?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 4:18 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
No it’s not
It’s highly relevant
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Holy shite you're retarded
quote:
It’s highly relevant
If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Once again, slowly this time so you might have a 0.0001% of understanding...Her. Intent. Has. Nothing. To. Do. With. Charges. Against. Him
Posted on 1/13/26 at 4:40 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
No it’s not It’s highly relevant If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Dude. The standard is crystal clear. How do you not know what it is. You opine from a place of complete ignorance.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 4:49 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Dude. The standard is crystal clear. How do you not know what it is. You opine from a place of complete ignorance.
Got to be just fricking with everyone at this point. Actually a pretty good troll job
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:06 pm to jchamil
Got to be just fricking with everyone at this point. Actually a pretty good troll job
No I’m pretty sure he’s just this stupid and stubborn
The real question is has he always been this stupid and stubborn or is it just because this has something to do with the Trump administration that he’s this stupid and stubborn.
No I’m pretty sure he’s just this stupid and stubborn
The real question is has he always been this stupid and stubborn or is it just because this has something to do with the Trump administration that he’s this stupid and stubborn.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:10 pm to jammajin
Its just so tiresome ugh
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:10 pm to jammajin
quote:
Got to be just fricking with everyone at this point. Actually a pretty good troll job No I’m pretty sure he’s just this stupid and stubborn
Either way, it’s pathetic
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:14 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
No it’s not It’s highly relevant If you drive off in your car, is your intent to travel or kill others?
Whoa buddy
You don’t know what you’re talking about.
Page 21 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News