- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:52 am to hogcard1964
I'll just drop this photo of Good here.....
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:54 am to Don Quixote
What's on the left? A dude?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:54 am to Don Quixote
quote:A Tennessee fan?
I'll just drop this photo of Good here.....
That tears it.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:55 am to hogcard1964
And try to understand “intent”
Both are not intended to be deadly weapons
Stop being obtuse if you can help it
Both are not intended to be deadly weapons
Stop being obtuse if you can help it
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:56 am to hogcard1964
quote:
What's on the left?
not sure but might be her deceased husband who was from the Knoxville area
Posted on 1/13/26 at 11:58 am to IvoryBillMatt
ShE aLrEaDy HiT hIm AnD wAs PaSt HiM!
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:01 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
And try to understand “intent”
Both are not intended to be deadly weapons
Again, what exactly do you think her "intent" has to do with this situation?
All that matters is whether he reasonably feared for his life or great bodily injury.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:03 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
ShE aLrEaDy HiT hIm AnD wAs PaSt HiM!
HoW woULd He KnOw the CrAZy bit(h wasn't AlReAdy deAd?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:31 pm to BBONDS25
The same people who have never been punched in the face are saying that he was barely hit by the car.
Same people who know everything about firearms but never owned one.
Same people who know everything about firearms but never owned one.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:33 pm to jchamil
quote:Agreed.
All that matters is whether he reasonably feared for his life or great bodily injury.
So why have we wasted so many pixels whining about what a horrible person she was?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:34 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:Priceless.
So why have we wasted so many pixels whining
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:34 pm to jchamil
quote:... or had the same fear for others.
All that matters is whether he reasonably feared for his life or great bodily injury.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:38 pm to jchamil
quote:
Again, what exactly do you think her "intent" has to do with this situation?
It can certainly be argued that she intended to drive away without an intent to kill anyone.
Without her testimony or any verbal indications prior to the shooting, we can’t tell.
The question is whether his force was measured adequately to her force. If she was intending to kill him then he can justify the shooting
I just think the video makes that a tough case to make and any good lawyer can make the case
Posted on 1/13/26 at 12:45 pm to jchamil
All that matters is whether he reasonably feared for his life or great bodily injury.
the few people arguing against you either don't understand this word or have an agenda that makes this word inconvenient so they pretend it's not part of your sentence
the few people arguing against you either don't understand this word or have an agenda that makes this word inconvenient so they pretend it's not part of your sentence
Posted on 1/13/26 at 1:10 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:You know how we know she was in a front wheel drive vehicle? Because her front wheels were spinning as she accelerated.
I just think the video makes that a tough case to make and any good lawyer can make the case
Posted on 1/13/26 at 2:07 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
It can certainly be argued that she intended to drive away without an intent to kill anyone.
Without her testimony or any verbal indications prior to the shooting, we can’t tell.
The question is whether his force was measured adequately to her force. If she was intending to kill him then he can justify the shooting
I just think the video makes that a tough case to make and any good lawyer can make the case
You keep using the word "intent" as it pertains to the woman shot. That has absolutely 0 bearing on this situation.
The only thing that matters is whether the shooter reasonably feared for his life or great bodily harm.
I saw you say everyone else is being obtuse. You harping on the dead woman's "intent" is the definition of being obtuse
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:10 pm to Flats
quote:
I'm not reading 18 pages but I'm willing to bet that somewhere in there Hank has already clucked his tongue about people resorting to cheap insults. Some things never change.
Yes, and it’s all about the deep state and cult as if everything liberals do is organic.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:12 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
If you can’t see the difference, I suggest you not be allowed to drive a vehicle Vehicles are not intended to kill things.
Intent is irrelevant
Some people use the design of vehicles to kill with them. Getting run over or T Boned is deadly.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 3:13 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
FFS, dude, you specifically said that you could use hindsight under Minnesota law.
Dude...ffs right under my post was the actual statute that I found and posted - can you not read?
Been a very hard time for you in this thread / your hypotheticals are crap , the videos prove you wrong and the actual laws are against you
But you just keep plugging - must be a great feeling to have 99percent of a board think you are less than intelligent and psychologically damaged
Page 20 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News