re: The bible doesn't forbid homosexuality - the left

quote:

---

I do believe she is right about Jesus never speaking out against homosexuality, though.

---

Jesus spoke out against SIN. Sin being beliefs and actions that move one's individual character further away from REAL LOVE. God being Love. Jesus did not condemn the harlot woman that the Pharisees wanted to stone. There is a helluva difference between real 'natural' love, and the fake version. Fake requires that the individual acquiesce to believing whatever allows service to their desire, Lucifer/Absolute Narcissism being at the fore of 'fake' (The Lie").

IMO, Adam and Eve (Metaphorical?) left the 'Garden' of innocence in order to experience 'Evil', that they might know themselves and make a valid choice to worship God/Love over love of Self/Lucifer. I do not begrudge any individual their right to experience all things which may affect their 'education' and ultimate, valid choice. I have no idea where the 'homosexual' urge comes from, no more so than I do where my own 'urges' do. I suspect such is and - to be fair - must come from previous (life) experience, beliefs and choices and consequences.

God did not "forbid" Adam and Eve this choice, though as any responsible and moral 'parent', he did state the ultimate consequences.

I know one thing for sure, having children changes one's perspective and character in regard to Love, and the highly problematic scenarios therein. An individual can learn things via having children that they will never experience being 'gay'. I oft suspected that the very moniker 'Gay' describes a spiritual scenario wherein people essentially DODGE the responsibility of children for the 'gaiety' of supposed freedom and happiness. Not good in the 'big picture'.

Just my $.02.

Trent Horn has discussed this topic many times. Here’s one recent video:

LINK

quote:

---

Last time I checked, an adult man having sex with a young boy is a homosexual act.

---

Yes but it's more heinous than a man with another man. Idk shite about these translations though.

quote:

---

The bible doesn't forbid homosexuality - the left

---

The left thinks it’s okay to murder babies. Let’s not waste time imagining that the left cares what the Bible says about anything.

quote:

---

They are very aware [of God's Law that opposes Divorce).

It’s just ignored like the left is trying to do with homosexuality.

---

Maybe in your opinion.

It is clear that homosexuals have ZERO reasons to want to believe the Holy Bible and Word of God -- nor have they any inclination to follow His Laws.

OTOH, Christians DO believe and want to follow God's Laws and Commandments -- albeit, too often selectively or faltering. (Yes, there are exception who *are* aware.)

I have lost count of the number of Christians who simply *still* do not know God's position on Divorce. This is likely as result of being conditioned to accept and adopted Civil Law on marriage as equal to or legit as God's Law.

We can not pretend to know how The Almighty handles the above matter -- whether it's known or a matter of ignorance.

If the progressives hadn't mastered the ability to redefine words, to bastardize history, to steadily destroy societal norms, they wouldn't have had a chance to fundamentally change America.....unfortunately the progressives infiltrated academia and the rest is our unfortunate US history.

quote:

---

I do believe she is right about Jesus never speaking out against homosexuality, though.

---

He never spoke out in favor of it either.

In Christianity, the arrival of Jesus heralded a change in how certain aspects of Judaism were viewed (thus the New Testament works vs the Old Testament works). For Christians, when there is a difference in stances between the two Testaments (for example, in the Old Testament called for animal sacrifices to atone for sins but in the New Testament Jesus was the sacrifice, thus there is no longer a need/requirement to sacrifice animals), we default to the New Testament. Where the New Testament is silent on something but the Old Testament speaks on it, we default to the Old.

Taking away the religious dogma and looking at it from simply a societal stance, homosexuality was very likely frowned on back then because infant mortality was so high and large, new generations were needed to help in supporting the family (having lots of kids to take care of you in your old age was pretty much the only retirement plan which existed back then).

From a purely biological standpoint, it's an evolutionary dead end. It could also be that it occurs as a natural attempt at limiting over-population.

Ironically, the societal stance defeats the biological stance as it has had the result of many homosexuals subverting their natural inclinations in favor of societal acceptance by achieving heterosexual sex (thus passing on those latent homosexual tendencies to further generations, combine that with knowledge which has almost neutralized infant mortality and you get the ability for natural-born homosexuality to proliferate to the point where the impressionable begin to question their own sexuality).


...and now I'm off on a tangent.

quote:

---

We can not pretend to know how The Almighty handles the above matter -- whether it's known or a matter of ignorance.

---

He put it in the book. It’s going to be on the final exam.

quote:

---

He put it in the book. It’s going to be on the final exam.

---

The Lord will be merciful in His Grace. All who are Believers are still sinners.

That said...

As Christians we must tread carefully when "stretching the rules." That is one Hammer of Justice you don't ever want to see slammed. It's...a FOREVER verdict.

Outside of any religious text or teachings, I often think that a strong, All-Americam clean cut guy (like myself as a 24 year old soldier) should be cleaning up with respect to the good looking "normal" young women these days.