Started By
Message
locked post

The absence of any constitutional knowledge by federal judges is stunning

Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:45 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98809 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:45 am
Federal Judge orders restart of DACA, but gives Trump 90 days to "justify" ending program

It is a fricking Executive Order. Dealing with a group of people that have NO LEGAL RIGHT TO REMAIN IN THE USA.

This essentially establishes an Executive Order is a LAW and that despite over 2 CENTURIES of custom and jurisprudence to the contrary, subsequent presidents cannot rescind priors EOs.

The upside is that this should be a tremendous boon to the GOP for the midterms.
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 11:46 am
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:46 am to
Once again, if Paul Ryan had ANY balls, he would initiate impeachment proceedings against this federal judge.

Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58012 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Federal Judge orders restart of DACA, but gives Trump 90 days to "justify" ending program


If he is making a ruling based on law instead of feelings, why would he need an explanation from Trump? Either it's legal or illegal.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27258 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:48 am to
You must understand, we are now not a nation of laws, but a nation of feelings.
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 11:48 am
Posted by Presidio
Member since Nov 2017
3060 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:48 am to
meh, the "judge" has made his ruling.... let's see him enforce it.

This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 11:49 am
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17711 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:49 am to
Executive Branch should just ignore this communist POS. Call him out for his activism and tell him to frick off.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:50 am to
I'm of the opinion that Trump needs to just tell these courts to go frick themselves.


There is actually zero in the COTUS that allows a court to do some of the things the courts have been doing over the last few years.
Posted by starsandstripes
Georgia
Member since Nov 2017
11897 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Once again, if Paul Ryan had ANY balls, he would initiate impeachment proceedings against this federal judge.


Amen, or at least prod the judiciary cmte to take it up.

Congress has no balls, but they have armored guards for baseball practice.

These judges know the Constitution but they choose to rule contrary to it. Presidential power here could not be clearer. This judge seems to be inferring that Obama's last EO created a new, separate class of people with subsequent special protections. It's baseless.

Oh well....when some dude somewhere decides enough is enough and one of these activist judges gets hurt, they'll cry about law and order then, but won't hear any of it in their courtrooms. Pretty sad.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15427 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:50 am to
Should just send the judge a picture of Trump giving him the bird.

"All the justification I need"

Stamped on it
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39195 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:51 am to
How do you rescind an executive order now? Does Congress need to pass an actual law? Apparently another executive order isn't good enough. Let's hope Trump takes advantage of this.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13496 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:52 am to
Liberalism, like 2 year olds, lives in the moment.
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 11:53 am
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41677 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:52 am to
It's not that they don't know about or understand the Constitution, it's that they don't care. They are activist judges who realize that they are unlikely to be impeached and lose their jobs but that their "opinions" can alter the course of our country.
Posted by TheCurmudgeon
Not where I want to be
Member since Aug 2014
1481 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:56 am to
quote:

it's that they don't care.


Dead solid on point.

They didn't get to be federal judges because they were the best attorneys in the district or circuit. They got to be federal judges because they were the best politically connected attorneys in the district or circuit.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23189 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 11:56 am to
Your false assumption is that their rulings imply they are ignorant rather than aware and purposefully afoul of the law
Posted by alatxtgr
The Nation of Texas
Member since Sep 2006
2285 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

There is actually zero in the COTUS that allows a court to do some of the things the courts have been doing over the last few years.
The American Bar Association is a laughing stock for not reeling in these activist sitting on the benches of these courts.
Posted by MizzouBS
Missouri
Member since Dec 2014
5839 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:09 pm to
The courts can overturn EO’s. Obama had a EO overturned and President Lincoln had a EO overturned as well. Your theory about two centuries and recent history of EO’s is incorrect.

Congress can overturn EO’s, but is difficult because most of the people in congress don’t want to go against their parties president.
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 12:11 pm
Posted by 995webmaster
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
3780 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

federal judges


Federal judges know a would-be dictator when they see one.
Posted by 10MTNTiger
Banks of the Guadalupe
Member since Sep 2012
4139 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:09 pm to
It isn't an absence of knowledge brother, they don't believe the Constitution applies anymore.
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Federal judges know a would-be dictator when they see one.


In a just world people as stupid as yourselves would be terminated , as all you do is steal resources from your betters.

Obama created a law, which the POTUS is not authorized to do, and now some judge says Trump must reinstate that law that he ended and you agree with said judge? LOL
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48357 posts
Posted on 4/25/18 at 12:19 pm to
This is what I call, the new revolutionary law that has to be written from the bench by revolutionary judges and Justices.

You see, this Racist White Supremacist United States is completely irredeemable and must be crushed by any means necessary. Traditional methods of change, such as voting, advocating the changing of the law through the courts by following the Rule of Law -- these old-fashioned methods were created by the White Supremacists to stop or slow-down revolutionary change.

History demands that the Progressives take matters into their own hands by exercising special actions on all fronts to force revolutionary change.

This White Supremacist political entity called the USA was created with the specific intent to commit genocide on People of Color whilst at the same time promoting White Supremacy.

500 years of US genocide against People of Color was never going to end willingly because the White People wanted it. It was always going to have to change by revolutionary mass action. Revolutionary juridical process is part of this effort.

This is The New Law: That which promotes the Revolutionary Agenda is legal. That which retards or blocks the Revolutionary Agenda is illegal.

This is the New Law. The sooner you realize this, the sooner you will gain deeper understanding of current events.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram