- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The absence of any constitutional knowledge by federal judges is stunning
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:43 pm to udtiger
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:43 pm to udtiger
Trump should fire anyone he can and order the reassignment of those he can't who execute this program to positions where they cannot take DACA applications.
Your move, Federal Judges.
Your move, Federal Judges.
This post was edited on 4/25/18 at 2:43 pm
2
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:46 pm to udtiger
quote:
This essentially establishes an Executive Order is a LAW and that despite over 2 CENTURIES of custom and jurisprudence to the contrary, subsequent presidents cannot rescind priors EOs.
So write an EO banning judges from reviewing EO's. Boom! Caught in their own trap set by the judicial traitors.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:49 pm to Ace Midnight
what he should do is to enforce his EO as he sees fit, and if a constitutional crisis occurs, so be it ... i would think he'd chomp at the bit for that ... if he's going to try to mix things up, then let's get to mixing ...
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:49 pm to udtiger
Some complete Morons at the judicial and legislative branches of federal government
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:53 pm to udtiger
Federal Judges are no longer interpreters of the Constitution and the law, they are mostly political hacks.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:59 pm to UFMatt
The Second Amendment was not put in place to ONLY protect against tyranny by the executive and legislative branches -- it applies to the judicial branch as well.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 2:59 pm to UFMatt
Am I missing the link to the decision? I don't see one anywhere and didn't see one through generic internet search.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 3:03 pm to udtiger
This happens all the time with judges and juries. I call it 'pick your justification.'
1. The judge has already made up his mind well before the case.
2. The judge carefully examines the arguments that can be used to base a justification for a decision that has already been made.
3. Oh! It's a box of mixed chocolates! I'll pick this one to write about in my decision.
1. The judge has already made up his mind well before the case.
2. The judge carefully examines the arguments that can be used to base a justification for a decision that has already been made.
3. Oh! It's a box of mixed chocolates! I'll pick this one to write about in my decision.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 3:10 pm to tiderider
quote:
i don't like trump and i support daca, but the courts do not have constitutional authority to declare a reversal of an EO unconstitutional ... an EO is not a law, by any stretch of any definition - constitutionally speaking ... regardless of the personality of the person/party attempting to repeal it, the executive office has that right ...
Sincerely
good for you
quote:
at this point, i don't give a damn what either party does ... i just want the balance of power shifted away from the executive office and courts and back to congress ..
That's the damn shame of it. Trump reversing this EO actually took power away from the Executive that Obama stole from Congress and liberals are complaining.
A President never has the authority to say "oh you wont pass a law I want, frick you then" and just make his own law.
Posted on 4/25/18 at 3:25 pm to udtiger
quote:
This essentially establishes an Executive Order is a LAW and that despite over 2 CENTURIES of custom and jurisprudence to the contrary, subsequent presidents cannot rescind priors EOs.
If this is the case, Trump! is gonna kill it these next 6.5 years. America gonna be fixed permanently.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 10:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:So now every FISA Judge is questionable? That's a joke.
Guy was on the fisa court. He is a swampy as they come. Nobody will care who nominated him. Everyone views activist judges as leftists.
Activist judge? That's just the Republican spin they are gonna try to lay on him. Good luck trying to convince everyone that he is somehow not a Republican Judge.
Besides, he wasn't being an activist judge. The DOJ fell down on their submittal. That's why he gave them 90 days to re-submit.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 10:32 pm to udtiger
You know what the difference is?
He has been constitutionally appointed to make this decision. You haven’t.
The 9th will prolly overturn it. So chill.
He has been constitutionally appointed to make this decision. You haven’t.
The 9th will prolly overturn it. So chill.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 10:34 pm to Ace Midnight
Check, meet balance.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News