Started By
Message

re: Texas keeps dead body as fetus incubator against family's wishes.

Posted on 1/28/14 at 4:43 am to
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 4:43 am to
quote:

Everyone but the small texas guvment wanted the mom to be allowed to be buried so the father could start to grieve.


Lets be real...the only thing that the right, for the most part, wants to be small about Government is the ability to tax and regulate. Outside of that the Government can get as intrusive as it wants. Your kids not praying enough at school? Let the state intervene. Want to marry your fiancee who just so happens to urinate in the same manner that you do? Let the state intervene. Want to make medical decisions for you and yours? Let the state intervene. Want to dump some toxic shite in a river that could kill people downstream??? Oh...the market will take care of that. You have to have the mental accumen of a 4 year old, one who is not very bright, to subscribe to the current brand of conservatism in the UNited States....
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85510 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 6:30 am to
quote:

So he says she will in the future, but your post said she already is and smells Which is it?
Whichever it takes for another fricking libtard to try to make a weak assed troll.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83308 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:15 am to
about on par with his shitty tuba ranking threads
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100806 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:16 am to
I have to agree in this case if the family of the dead mother don't want to keep her on life support for the baby, then they should pull the plug.

The chances are slim the fetus will even make it, and slimmer it will be 100% healthy. This is a case that it's ok to just let nature do its work.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
85510 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:18 am to
quote:

I have to agree in this case if the family of the dead mother don't want to keep her on life support for the baby, then they should pull the plug.
Bingo.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
87795 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:40 am to
quote:

No no no In tuba world if you are on life support for 2 weeks you can be an extra on the walking dead


You're joking.

But I'd bet he really believes that.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:54 am to
I cannot wait for the fig gene to be brought out into the open where you can kill 'em in the womb.

The libs will turn into a pretzel over that.

I am generally pro-life but if you son is going to be a cocksucker off him.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23072 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:58 am to
So family lost their daughter and is just ok with letting her child die as well even though it can be saved?

Eta: reading it again. Not sure if the child could have been.
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 8:02 am
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
67641 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 7:59 am to
quote:

I cannot wait for the fig gene to be brought out into the open where you can kill 'em in the womb.


quote:

I am generally pro-life but if you son is going to be a cocksucker off him.


TD Political Talk.

Where the best and brightest gather to discuss the complex issues of the day in a well reasoned and civil manner.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:01 am to
quote:

So family lost their daughter and is just ok with letting her child die as well even though it can be saved?




Yes.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
45186 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:05 am to
So every time a pregnant woman dies, you believe her body should remain hooked up to machines until birth? This baby was only 14 weeks at the time if her death - not even close to viable.

Babies die all the time when the women carrying them die. It's natural. It's happened since the beginning of mankind. I'm pro-life and I can't understand wth is wrong with you people thinking bodies should remain hooked up to life support for 4-5 months hoping for a birth from a dead woman.
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Where the best and brightest gather to discuss the complex issues of the day in a well reasoned and civil manner.


He may have a point if you consider the gender based abortions in China and India.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23072 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:07 am to
So was she in some way conscious in hospital before she went brain dead? I would not want to be kept alive by machines either UNLESS me being kept alive could some how save the life of my child.

Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
23072 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Babies die all the time when the women carrying them die. It's natural. It's happened since the beginning of mankind. I'm pro-life and I can't understand wth is wrong with you people thinking bodies should remain hooked up to life support for 4-5 months hoping for a birth from a dead woman.


I am not saying the govt should get involved; HOWEVER, if i was your husband and I could save the life of my child then i would keep my wife alive in order to do so. My wife would want me to.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76603 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:12 am to
Are we really going to have another thread about this? The original one was already long as hell and this one will end exactly like that one did.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109803 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:20 am to
quote:


Are we really going to have another thread about this? The original one was already long as hell and this one will end exactly like that one did.




I didn't see that one. Did it achieve total and complete resolution of all issues to the ultimate satisfaction of all parties involved, as most big threads here tend to do?
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:24 am to
quote:

So was she in some way conscious in hospital before she went brain dead? I would not want to be kept alive by machines either UNLESS me being kept alive could some how save the life of my child


I don't want kids to die either. I would not have hesitated to pull my wife off life support in this particular instance. Sometimes it is better to accept the situation and bury your dead.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
76603 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Did it achieve total and complete resolution of all issues to the ultimate satisfaction of all parties involved, as most big threads here tend to do?
Will you believe me if I say yes?
Posted by Projectpat
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2011
11104 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:30 am to
Which is sadder? The fact that you thought this would be a good troll, or that the usual suspects showed up and actually supported it.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
26461 posts
Posted on 1/28/14 at 8:31 am to
She's being kept alive even though she's clinically dead.

Interesting ethical dilemma for the physician. You have to look out for your patient and respect the family's wishes....but in this case there are two to look out for. In this case, the courts demanded that the mother be removed from life support.
quote:

She was DEAD. DEAD PEOPLE DECOMPOSE

No. She was clinically dead....she was being kept alive via life support.

You are way, way off base with this....but that's par for the course with you.
This post was edited on 1/28/14 at 8:49 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram