- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Temu Barack "I have no recollection of the email."
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:32 pm to Bama Mountain
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:32 pm to Bama Mountain
Settle down Stacey, alter.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:33 pm to geoag58
quote:
Why is hakeem in bed with a consulting firm who was wanting to jump in bed with epstein?
Hey hey hey hey!! No more questions!!! He said he didn’t recall!! Let’s all move on and forget!!
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:36 pm to Jbird
Let’s call out Hakeem Jeffries’ blatant hypocrisy — using HIS OWN WORDS. ??
Hakeem goes on CNN and gets asked a simple question:
Was it appropriate for Stacey Plaskett to be texting Jeffrey Epstein 11 years after he pleaded guilty as a sex offender?
Watch how he squirms:
Kaitlan Collins tries to get a straight answer:
“She was arguing her texts with Jeffrey Epstein were not illegal. But in your view, were they appropriate?”
Instead of answering, Hakeem dodges:
“Stacey Plaskett is not accused of violating any House rule, any law, any statute.”
“She’s clearly and unequivocally denounced Jeffrey Epstein.”
Collins presses again:
“Do you think it was appropriate for her to be texting with Jeffrey Epstein 11 years after he pleaded guilty—”
Hakeem dodges again:
“I have not had a conversation with Stacey Plaskett to discuss this issue…”
Collins tries AGAIN:
“Do you plan to talk to her about it?”
Hakeem swerves completely:
“We successfully defeated a resolution that lacked any basis… That’s the end of the story.”
Collins gives him one more chance:
“I was just asking if you personally believe messaging with Jeffrey Epstein, who is at that point a registered—”
And he cuts her off.
He REFUSES to answer.
Not once did he say:
?? “Yes, it was wrong.”
?? “No, it wasn’t appropriate.”
?? “She shouldn’t have done it.”
He couldn’t.
Because Democrats only condemn Epstein when it’s politically convenient — not when it exposes THEIR own involvement.
Hakeem Jeffries just showed the country EXACTLY how deep the hypocrisy runs.
Hakeem goes on CNN and gets asked a simple question:
Was it appropriate for Stacey Plaskett to be texting Jeffrey Epstein 11 years after he pleaded guilty as a sex offender?
Watch how he squirms:
Kaitlan Collins tries to get a straight answer:
“She was arguing her texts with Jeffrey Epstein were not illegal. But in your view, were they appropriate?”
Instead of answering, Hakeem dodges:
“Stacey Plaskett is not accused of violating any House rule, any law, any statute.”
“She’s clearly and unequivocally denounced Jeffrey Epstein.”
Collins presses again:
“Do you think it was appropriate for her to be texting with Jeffrey Epstein 11 years after he pleaded guilty—”
Hakeem dodges again:
“I have not had a conversation with Stacey Plaskett to discuss this issue…”
Collins tries AGAIN:
“Do you plan to talk to her about it?”
Hakeem swerves completely:
“We successfully defeated a resolution that lacked any basis… That’s the end of the story.”
Collins gives him one more chance:
“I was just asking if you personally believe messaging with Jeffrey Epstein, who is at that point a registered—”
And he cuts her off.
He REFUSES to answer.
Not once did he say:
?? “Yes, it was wrong.”
?? “No, it wasn’t appropriate.”
?? “She shouldn’t have done it.”
He couldn’t.
Because Democrats only condemn Epstein when it’s politically convenient — not when it exposes THEIR own involvement.
Hakeem Jeffries just showed the country EXACTLY how deep the hypocrisy runs.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:38 pm to Jbird
quote:
I have no recollection of the email.
Up next, "What possible difference does it make now?"
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:38 pm to The Torch
Furthermore, Kaitlan Collins will be foaming at the mouth to insinuate DJT was involved during his next live presser when she will once again show her stupidity on the world stage.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:43 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
Why should he recall an email he didn't send? Maybe because Jefferies did not send the email, a consulting group did.......but you knew that.
EABODs brokeback mountain
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:44 pm to 4LSU2
quote:
Kaitlan Collins
If count had a picture in the dictionary
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:50 pm to Jbird
He has Bidenitis. Next will be the 3 pm pudding cup.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:02 pm to Bama Mountain
I believed he and team met with Epstein too
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:04 pm to Jbird
Watching Twat Collins actually press Fartacus on the issue, is something memorable. I won't be forgetting that for a good while.
It's time to expose every one of these sick bastards and enablers. On both sides.
If every shred of evidence that comes out only points the finger at Dims, I'll know for sure that we're only getting half of the story. The GOPe was most certainly involved as well, though perhaps to a slightly lesser degree.
It's time to expose every one of these sick bastards and enablers. On both sides.
If every shred of evidence that comes out only points the finger at Dims, I'll know for sure that we're only getting half of the story. The GOPe was most certainly involved as well, though perhaps to a slightly lesser degree.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:13 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
a consulting group did
The uneducated masses here don’t realize this. They don’t realize consulting groups buy email lists from campaigns, other fundraisers, etc, and use those lists to solicit donations from whoever’s email is on that list.
Wealthy donors don’t get emails. They get phone calls made by the member requesting funds or a high-level designee.
The idiocy of people posting on this board never ceases to amaze me.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:16 pm to DCTiger
Wealthy donors also text congressman during committee hearings
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:58 pm to DCTiger
quote:
The idiocy of people posting on this board never ceases to amaze me.
Oh okay now I understand. So when they needed to buy out the contract of Kelly at LSU for millions they just had consultants send out emails to Gordon McKernan?
Speaking of dumbarses, you dont think those lists are parsed before they send out contacts, to ensure they dont send to people who will make them look foolish??????
Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:28 pm to Jbird
he looks like he's aged a lot the past few months.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:30 pm to DCTiger
quote:
The uneducated masses here don’t realize this. They don’t realize consulting groups buy email lists from campaigns, other fundraisers, etc, and use those lists to solicit donations from whoever’s email is on that list.
Wealthy donors don’t get emails. They get phone calls made by the member requesting funds or a high-level designee.
The idiocy of people posting on this board never ceases to amaze me.
I mean wealthy democrats hung out with and corresponded with Epstein. After being found guilty of trafficking minors.
And you don't see anything wrong with this.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:31 pm to Jbird
quote:
"I have no recollection of the email."
Everyone knows that THAT means!!
RUSSIAN TRADECRAFT!!!!!
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 3:36 pm
Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:33 pm to Jbird
In fairness, DC politicians would email the Devil himself if they thought there might be a campaign contribution to be had.

Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:38 pm to dgnx6
quote:
he looks like he's aged a lot the past few months
Shows how JV team Brooklyn Barack is, and will never be ready to be a starter for the Dems.
At least, not the effective Barack 2.0 everyone had hoped.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 3:38 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
You should at least try to be honest. Promoting the lie that "Jefferies solicited money from Jeffery Epstein", when it is clear that he didn't, makes you look foolish and desperate.
So, a democrat firm solicited money for the new Brooklyn Barak from Jeffery Epstein.
Do you know why? Because they had no problem with him being a convicted sex trafficker. None of them cut him off after his conviction. He stayed running in those circles with affluent democrats.
But Trump cut him off before his conviction.
Popular
Back to top


0








