- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Telegraph Reporting That VP Vance Is Not A Fan Of Our Decision To Go To War With Iran
Posted on 3/2/26 at 6:59 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 3/2/26 at 6:59 am to LuckyTiger
Isn’t the Telegraph a newspaper from that Muslim country across the pond?
1
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:00 am to BOHICAMAN
Conservative paper
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:02 am to LuckyTiger
If true, it certainly makes me more of a fan of Vance. Probably the press trying to stir shite up, though.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:03 am to rbm1
quote:
Thats why I don't want J D Vance to succeed Trump! I want Eric Trump! Remember J D was opposed to Trump before he was for him. Why not reverse to what you wanted in the first place? LOSER!
No
I want Rubio to be President
He’s been phenomenal as secretary of state
He’s a heck of a speaker
Very knowledgeable, articulate and likable
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:04 am to rbm1
quote:
Remember J D was opposed to Trump before he was for him
there’s more people in Trumps inner circle now that are championing this war that were diabolically opposed to Trump and everything about him just 4-6 years ago… Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:05 am to Gifman
quote:
We’re not “at war” the Iran.
This idiotic line of argument baffles me.
When you drop bombs and fire missiles at another nation with the intent of killing their leaders, killing their soldiers, destroying their infrastructure and overthrowing their government, that's a fricking war. You can play sematical bullshite with it all you want if it makes you feel better, but we invaded another nation.
Again, no one calls Pearl Harbor "just a military operation".
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:07 am to AUCom96
quote:
This idiotic line of argument baffles me.
I’m not surprised it does.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:09 am to AUCom96
quote:
This idiotic line of argument baffles me
To say this then bring up Pearl Harbor is also idiotic
We have been "at war" with Iran for a very long time
Orange finally wiped them out
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:09 am to LuckyTiger
They’ve always said “Washington hates Vance” and generally there isn’t anything more Washington than getting us into some war they all make money off of
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:13 am to Rebel
Vance was right if he was opposed.
This is the same old song. Looks like a great party for a few weeks with a bunch of people slapping themselves on the back.
There are 90 million people in Iran. The idea that this is going to be smooth or easy is dumb.
You have every kind of faction in Iran. Some have weapons and some don't. Business interests, religious fanatics, different religious and political factions inside all of these groups. Outside groups and a whole lot of money washing around.
This is the peak.
This may turn out to be the 2028 political battlefield for the Republican Party.
This is the same old song. Looks like a great party for a few weeks with a bunch of people slapping themselves on the back.
There are 90 million people in Iran. The idea that this is going to be smooth or easy is dumb.
You have every kind of faction in Iran. Some have weapons and some don't. Business interests, religious fanatics, different religious and political factions inside all of these groups. Outside groups and a whole lot of money washing around.
This is the peak.
This may turn out to be the 2028 political battlefield for the Republican Party.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:13 am to SDVTiger
quote:
To say this then bring up Pearl Harbor is also idiotic
Panicans tend to be dramatic.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:18 am to Tiger985
Yeah it really is a shame we let our military and state department leaders talk us into another mess. This is going to be 10x the mess Iraq was.
And we still have Venezuela to keep on top of.
And we still have Venezuela to keep on top of.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:19 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
Telegraph Reporting That VP Vance Is Not A Fan Of Our Decision To Go To War With Iran
We already know this. Tulsi Gabbard wasn't a fan either.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:23 am to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Yes. And it is Marco Rubio and the neocon ratfrickers who have coopted Trump’s 2nd administration.
It's quite a sight to behold how this board in 2016 knew Rubio was a GOPe neocon, then maintained that stance until Trump appointed him. And now they're Ok with him becoming Prez.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:30 am to stelly1025
quote:
legit he is probably worrying about the panicians and groypers. They have been extra melty over this
Yea, the last set of regime changes in that shithole worked out well for us- a major recession and eight years of Obama and all his bullshite.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:31 am to LuckyTiger
The walls are closing in... A UK trash paper.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:32 am to Cuz413
Correct. Rubio was a ringleader among the group on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence that was actively working to destroy the 1st Trump administration.
This is a long established fact. He's a neocon that learned how to weasel himself next to Trump by kissing his arse.
Rubio is a neocon through and through.
Vance will beat Rubio because this Iran situation is going to be a mess. Yes, it's great these butchers in Iran are getting their just reward but it's absolutely going to me a huge mess for Trump and Rubio.
I think Trump really stepped in it here.
It's like saying Iraq and Afghanistan were America First. It's the same old neocon bullshite.
Venezuela and Iran were Bolton ideas going back decades. Now Rubio is great for picking up those balls? Give me a break.
This is a long established fact. He's a neocon that learned how to weasel himself next to Trump by kissing his arse.
Rubio is a neocon through and through.
Vance will beat Rubio because this Iran situation is going to be a mess. Yes, it's great these butchers in Iran are getting their just reward but it's absolutely going to me a huge mess for Trump and Rubio.
I think Trump really stepped in it here.
It's like saying Iraq and Afghanistan were America First. It's the same old neocon bullshite.
Venezuela and Iran were Bolton ideas going back decades. Now Rubio is great for picking up those balls? Give me a break.
This post was edited on 3/2/26 at 7:35 am
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:34 am to Gifman
quote:
We’re not “at war” the Iran.
I blame Jjdoc for introducing this absolutely idiotic take with his thread that he started a few hours into it. It’s semantics and it is beyond absurd. One last thing, Hegseth has called this a “war”.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:41 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
according to sources.
According to "sources," Trump colluded with Russia in the 2016 election.
"According to sources" means jack squat.
Posted on 3/2/26 at 7:50 am to SDVTiger
quote:
We have been "at war" with Iran for a very long time Orange finally wiped them out
Oh they’re wiped out? Where are you getting this evidence from, Fox or Laura Loomer’s X posts?
Iran can’t go toe to toe with our military, they just have to hunker down and absorb the air strikes.
We’ll bomb the hell out of them for another week, a back door deal will be struck and Iran will “behave” for a few months. Another Supreme a-hole will be installed and the IRGC will be back to their same old tricks- creating instability and supporting their proxies.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News