- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Susan Rice email shows that Obama and Comey agreed NOT to proceed "by the book"
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
That email won't go anywhere. It is not damaging to Rice, Obama, Comey because it is addressing a concern of passing sensitive info of an investigation to the Russians. So there is nothing there looking at it as a stand alone email.
However, the email alone will not go anywhere but if coupled with the idea that the Russia-gate ruse was planned by the WH, Hillary, Comey, Rice then it might go somewhere. Proving this with hard evidence will be difficult and likely not go anywhere. They were smart and careful and this email shows that they were thinking about if they ever get investigated we need to have plausible deniability.
However, the email alone will not go anywhere but if coupled with the idea that the Russia-gate ruse was planned by the WH, Hillary, Comey, Rice then it might go somewhere. Proving this with hard evidence will be difficult and likely not go anywhere. They were smart and careful and this email shows that they were thinking about if they ever get investigated we need to have plausible deniability.
0
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:17 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:20 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The rush to defend that piece of shite is impressive.
It is a legal cult.
It is a legal cult.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:25 am to RollTide1987
quote:
Everyone knew the book was being thrown out when Susan Rice met with Bill Clinton on a plane on the tarmac.
Loretta Lynch
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:26 am to cajunangelle
Not being at least brought in under scrutiny is not only undermining current and past behavior but guaranteeing future misdeeds on a larger scale
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:31 am to RollTide1987
You mean Lynch, Obama's AG.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:34 am to Jbird
Always defending tLeft 
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:35 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Always defending tLeft
I said people can't read. How is that defending the left?
Their ignorance in failed attacks on the left being pointed out as failures is in no way "defending" the left. It's only defending reality.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:37 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
You want see any of the usual suspects defend this. They are all morally bankrupt sheep and only care about their party. It’s pathetic
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:39 am to boosiebadazz
Still on Russiagate. Now THATS impressive even for you
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:40 am to DawgCountry
quote:
Still on Russiagate. Now THATS impressive even for you
Can you discuss these emails without tangentially referencing Russiagate?
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:41 am to SlowFlowPro
He brought up Russia you moron 
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:41 am to SlowFlowPro
“ Which quote says this? I see multiple references to proceeding in the law enforcement and intelligence "by the book" but none saying not to act outside of it.
The only modification was a potential sharing of intelligence, but it doesn't say anything about prohibiting this and they are "mindful to ascertain" if there would be any national security issues in doing so.
That letter does the opposite of pain the Obama admin in a bad light. You need to find a LOT more for any potential criminality. And Obama is absolutely immune, regardless, as he was still President and this is pure executive functions.”(quote SFP).
More “if the glove don’t fit…gotta acquit” BS. This is why dialogue becomes an inflammatory impediment to Justice and Rule of Law instead of promoting it. Fancy ‘lawyer speak’ which essentially mocks real Justice and undermines civil society.
Of course one person’s “social justice”(Egalitarian DEI) is another’s Fascist Government. Like Rush said, it’s always “follow the money “ from the top to the bottom.
The only modification was a potential sharing of intelligence, but it doesn't say anything about prohibiting this and they are "mindful to ascertain" if there would be any national security issues in doing so.
That letter does the opposite of pain the Obama admin in a bad light. You need to find a LOT more for any potential criminality. And Obama is absolutely immune, regardless, as he was still President and this is pure executive functions.”(quote SFP).
More “if the glove don’t fit…gotta acquit” BS. This is why dialogue becomes an inflammatory impediment to Justice and Rule of Law instead of promoting it. Fancy ‘lawyer speak’ which essentially mocks real Justice and undermines civil society.
Of course one person’s “social justice”(Egalitarian DEI) is another’s Fascist Government. Like Rush said, it’s always “follow the money “ from the top to the bottom.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP your BS doesnt work
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:43 am to DawgCountry
quote:
He brought up Russia you moron
The emails in OP brought up Russia. I'm assuming you didn't read the actual thing being discussed.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:43 am to SDVTiger
quote:
SFP your BS doesnt work
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:44 am to SlowFlowPro
Glad you agree 
You dont need to live in a state of denial. Everyone knows
You dont need to live in a state of denial. Everyone knows
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:45 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Glad you agree
Me laughing at your ironic post isn't agreeing with you.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Yes of course
Posted on 5/7/26 at 7:46 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That letter does the opposite of pain the Obama admin in a bad light. You need to find a LOT more for any potential criminality. And Obama is absolutely immune, regardless, as he was still President and this is pure executive functions.
I agree with this statement. Nothing in the email is saying "Dont do this by the book". Unless you take the quotes around "By the book" as sarcastic reverse meaning. But couple this email where they are discussing a Russian collusion potential with the incoming Admin, with the fact that they are the ones that created the Russian collusion ruse, then it takes on a diff meaning.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News