- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Surprise! Donald Trump is terrible at diplomacy. - WaPo - Update: FT Still Right
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:26 pm
LINK
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved. We’re doing a victory lap and telling you “I told you so”.
quote:
Trump evidently thought he would threaten China with tariffs, and Beijing would fold as quickly as one of the vendors he has made a practice of stiffing. Not so fast. China retaliated by stopping purchases of U.S. soybeans, hurting the farm states whose votes Trump needs. China also made plain it wasn’t going to pressure North Korea into concessions as long as Trump was threatening its trade.
quote:
Lo and behold, Trump caved. First he tweeted that he would lift sanctions on Chinese telecom giant ZTE before kind of, sort of, walking it back. And then this week he ran up the white flag altogether, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin saying that the trade war is “on hold.” (Who knew that wars, like phone calls, could be put “on hold”?) Trump’s trade negotiators had been pushing for China to buy $200 billion more from the U.S. annually – a fantastical figure that U.S. factories and farms could not produce even if they wanted to. China refused, and the administration settled for a vague commitment to buy an unspecified amount of U.S. goods. Trump supporters such as Sen. Marco Rubio (R.-Fla.) correctly labeled this a “surrender,” because it did nothing to address China’s theft of U.S. intellectual property. Trump responded with an incomprehensible tweet: “Our Trade Deal with China is moving along nicely, but in the end we will probably have to use a different structure in that this will be too hard to get done and to verify results after completion.”
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved. We’re doing a victory lap and telling you “I told you so”.
This post was edited on 6/12/18 at 1:55 am
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:27 pm to FT
LOL
Back to your old scummy self I see
Back to your old scummy self I see
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:28 pm to FT
quote:
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved. We’re doing a victory lap and telling you “I told you so”.
The only problem with that is that it's premature
You can believe that this isn't over
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:28 pm to ShortyRob
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/27/23 at 8:13 am
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:28 pm to FT
NUCLEAR WAR [ON] OFF
Liberals be like:
Liberals be like:
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:28 pm to FT
FT DOWNVOTE CREW [IN]
Bookmarked this one, too
Bookmarked this one, too
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:30 pm to FT
I’m still curious to know where China plans on buying their soybeans from.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:32 pm to FT
Surprise, the left side with NK and Little Kim over POTUS.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:37 pm to FT
The best part is that when the deal is finalized the left will completely forget these sorts of rants and pretend they never happened.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:38 pm to FT
quote:
It’d be nice to get back to discussions on why this or that tax code works best; which approach to various foreign states is most efficacious.
Anyone up for trying that? Normal discussion between liberals and conservatives on the merits of policy?
I was hopeful.
It’s tough to do, however, when all you have to work with is a copy/paste job, and one lone comment: “We’re doing a victory lap and telling you ‘I told you so’.”
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:39 pm to Zap Rowsdower
quote:
I’m still curious to know where China plans on buying their soybeans from.
Probably the #2 and #3 producers of Soyabeans...
Brazil could reap benefits of China-US trade tension
Trump tariffs serve Beijing’s goal of building closer ties with Latin America
...
China is already Brazil's biggest trading partner and is becoming an important investor, ploughing nearly $21bn into Brazil last year. Neighbouring Argentina, the world's third largest soyabean producer, could benefit too.
“China’s interest in investing in Brazil and its dependence on Brazilian commodities will continue to strengthen in the current environment,” said TS Lombard analysts Elizabeth Johnson and Larry Brainard in a research note.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:39 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
The best part is that when the deal is finalized the left will completely forget these sorts of rants and pretend they never happened.
Onward to the next manufactured outrage du jour.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:40 pm to EKG
Truth, "let's have a discussion" is a throwaway line. His only goal was to gloat over what he perceives as major failures.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:42 pm to FT
quote:
Surprise! Donald Trump is terrible at diplomacy. - WaPo
You don't believe this.
Lame.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:42 pm to FT
Hahahaha
frick you
You fricking dumbshits want to leapt to declare defeat when nothing is finished.
You assholes do that with wars too.
frick you
You fricking dumbshits want to leapt to declare defeat when nothing is finished.
You assholes do that with wars too.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 4:43 pm to Dead End
quote:
Surprise, the left side with NK and Little Kim over POTUS.
no ones siding with Kim
the article is just pointing out facts, Trump's admin is unprepared and weak on foreign policy, they have zero plans and just kinda wing it.
its showing in the results.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News