- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Surprise! Donald Trump is terrible at diplomacy. - WaPo - Update: FT Still Right
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:29 pm to EKG
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:29 pm to EKG
This is absolutely about the merits of policy.
Alienating China while trying to court North Korea is the most classic example of putting the cart before the horse. Work with China, at least be civil, don’t attack them economically, and use the good will to push for the NK meeting and denuclearization.
This is policy. It’s important.
Alienating China while trying to court North Korea is the most classic example of putting the cart before the horse. Work with China, at least be civil, don’t attack them economically, and use the good will to push for the NK meeting and denuclearization.
This is policy. It’s important.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:31 pm to FT
quote:
and use the good will to push for the NK meeting and denuclearization.
The left is a giant pile of bloody pussies.
60 years of appeasement has led us to where we are.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:33 pm to FT
quote:
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved.
Like hell you’re not.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:33 pm to FT
quote:
This is policy. It’s importan
What have we lost? How has the alleged alienation of china to court NK caused the NK summit to fall through?
You are victory lapping a delay in peace with NK. It most certainly is not about policy to you.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:34 pm to FT
quote:
FT
You should get a NOKO flag tattooed just above your clitoris to commemorate this moment. Sure, the OT will call it trashy but those frat boys will never be down with the struggle.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:34 pm to FT
quote:
This is absolutely about the merits of policy.
Alienating China while trying to court North Korea is the most classic example of putting the cart before the horse. Work with China, at least be civil, don’t attack them economically, and use the good will to push for the NK meeting and denuclearization.
This is policy. It’s important.
quote:
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:34 pm to upgrayedd
The difference here is that you’re temporarily appeasing China, not pushing policies that permanently help them. You can go back on the deal once you’ve brokered the deal with North Korea. Then if NK slips, because of what you did with China, China and NK are the bad guys.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:36 pm to FT
could your marxist avi be a little more brighter?
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:38 pm to FT
quote:
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved.
bullshite
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:38 pm to FT
quote:
We aren’t celebrating that North Korean tensions haven’t improved. We’re doing a victory lap and telling you “I told you so”.
North Korea, like 5 minutes ago:
"we still want to meet with US to resolve issues"
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:39 pm to FT
quote:
The difference here is that you’re temporarily appeasing China, not pushing policies that permanently help them.
How so?
quote:
You can go back on the deal once you’ve brokered the deal with North Korea. Then if NK slips, because of what you did with China, China and NK are the bad guys.
What?
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:40 pm to FT
This is why we don't celebrate tweets. Rather, we wait for results.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:40 pm to cajunangelle
We unfroze accounts. We didn’t give Iran anything that wasn’t theirs.
The Middle East dumpster fire started in 2003. Barack Obama did a reasonable job of containing things, and did very little to proactively end the problems. I would have been more aggressive, but I’m not privy to all the details of the intel we had.
He should have closed GITMO.
Every US President is protested everywhere to one degree or another.
Bowing to what world leaders, and what commies? He opened up relations with Cuba after years of no relations didn’t help. He bowed once to a king, and Trump partied with the same government. No US President has been nearly as hard on Saudi Arabia as we should be.
The Middle East dumpster fire started in 2003. Barack Obama did a reasonable job of containing things, and did very little to proactively end the problems. I would have been more aggressive, but I’m not privy to all the details of the intel we had.
He should have closed GITMO.
Every US President is protested everywhere to one degree or another.
Bowing to what world leaders, and what commies? He opened up relations with Cuba after years of no relations didn’t help. He bowed once to a king, and Trump partied with the same government. No US President has been nearly as hard on Saudi Arabia as we should be.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:42 pm to FT
quote:
We unfroze accounts. We didn’t give Iran anything that wasn’t theirs.
liar
pallets of cash
13 wire transfers of $99,999,999.00 to avoid oversight - why do that?
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:44 pm to FT
quote:
We unfroze accounts. We didn’t give Iran anything that wasn’t theirs.
Immediate access to cash that immediately went to create unrest throughout southwest asia while simultaneously stripping the USG from using sanctions to combat the destruction. The "we didn't give them anything" line is ridiculous.
Posted on 5/24/18 at 5:44 pm to upgrayedd
By declining to sanction them, and acting as though you want to trade more.
Read again.
Read again.
Popular
Back to top


4






