- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court being formally asked to overturn Obergefell; gay marriage will fall
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:23 pm to Tmo Sabe
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:23 pm to Tmo Sabe
quote:
The jews who blackmail the justices on the court would like nothing more than a homo revolt in these USA
The Joos sure do get around, don't they?
Being that the entire world's population of Joos is roughly the population of Pennsylvania, how do you suppose they control an entire planet of 8 billion people?
That's a hell of a lot of buttons to push and levers to pull for such a small group, isn't it?
Also, if they can run the entire planet, it sure seems like they could solve the Middle East issues they been having constant trouble with since around 1948.
Or is that part of the Joo-ruse?
1
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:24 pm to Tmo Sabe
Troll someplace else.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:27 pm to wackatimesthree
Da Joos and ChiComs, baby. They struck a deal....oh, yeah, and......they hate our freedom.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 2:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
slow flow dumbass has spoken...
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:17 pm to geauxtigers
He’s going to be so butt hurt when this case gets heard and I bump it
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:23 pm to geauxtigers
quote:
slow flow dumbass has spoken...
He's not going to like the way this one ends (just like his last melt), but I'm sure he'll claim he predicted the opposite outcome again.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's crazy Kim Davis again.
Yikes.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:25 pm to LegendInMyMind
You guys keep saying this. What the circuit court says is irrelevant all the matters is if the SC wants to hear it.
Even if they don’t this is building momentum for it. The same thing happened with Roe until one broke through. This case is destined to meet the same outcome
Even if they don’t this is building momentum for it. The same thing happened with Roe until one broke through. This case is destined to meet the same outcome
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:47 pm to td01241
Damn, drop the damn Gay LGBT issue. It is nothing but a political beach ball. Nothing good will come of harassing gays etc. They pay SS as much as anyone else and are entitled to it and its benefits. State has no business deciding on marriage in anyone’s life.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 3:59 pm to sabbertooth
Ironic considering the LGBTs have insisted on pushing themselves into all of our lives at every conceivable level since the day this court decision was made
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:16 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
I can’t watch someone wearing a damn beanie cap indoors, and in the middle of the damn summer at that. What the frick is wrong with people?
Pool is as bald as a cue ball.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 4:26 pm to sabbertooth
quote:
Damn, drop the damn Gay LGBT issue.
I'm sure people would love to. I dare say if it had really been about "equality" everyone would have pretty much forgotten about them by now.
But every time you look up the Alphabet Army is surging forward foisting men into women's private spaces, grooming small kids in schools and libraries, insisting that men play women's sports, sterilizing children and surgically removing their genitals, etc., etc., etc.
I notice that you left the "Q" out of LGBT. Do you know what the Q stands for? More to the point, do you know what it means? Most people do not, including many LGBTQ members.
"Queer" refers to a mindset that seeks to destroy all normative mores and values regarding sexuality. Those are not my words, those are their words. The stated goal is to tear down every normative sexual value and societal norm.
Adults not having sex with children? Incest? Gender? Those are normative mores and values about sexuality.
Doubtless you will claim that they don't really mean what they say, which—again—is that they won't stop until no normative sexual values exist anymore. I have found that you should listen to people when they tell you who they are and what they wish to do.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 5:39 pm to td01241
quote:
He’s going to be so butt hurt when this case gets heard and I bump it
And when cert is denied people will claim I was wrong
Posted on 8/11/25 at 5:44 pm to TwoFace
quote:screw it up with a massive win. Sometimes politics means doing what's right. This needs to be overturned.
Just in time to frick up midterms.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 5:56 pm to FnTigers
quote:
screw it up with a massive win. Sometimes politics means doing what's right. This needs to be overturned.
It’s a much bigger deal to win mid terms than lose them.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 6:43 pm to djsdawg
We are going to slaughter the mid terms no matter what if the re district stuff is done in time. The new census won’t be in play until 2028 unfortunately but the wiping out of majority minority districts if it happens in the fall as we hope will alone cost dems 20 seats which is a 40 seat swing
Posted on 8/11/25 at 7:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Wait. It seems like this is primarily about the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause and is almost only tangentially related to Obergefell, ie, if Obergefell is deemed invalid, her actions would not violate any constitutional right, nullifying the basis for the suit and damages, but doesn't actually challenge Obergfell directly. Am I off base?
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.
In a petition for writ of certiorari filed last month, Davis argues First Amendment protection for free exercise of religion immunizes her from personal liability for the denial of marriage licenses.
quote:
More fundamentally, she claims the high court's decision in Obergefell v Hodges -- extending marriage rights for same-sex couples under the 14th Amendment's due process protections -- was "egregiously wrong."
"The mistake must be corrected," wrote Davis' attorney Mathew Staver in the petition. He calls Justice Anthony Kennedy's majority opinion in Obergefell "legal fiction."
quote:
Lower courts have dismissed Davis' claims and most legal experts consider her bid a long shot. A federal appeals court panel concluded earlier this year that the former clerk "cannot raise the First Amendment as a defense because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect."
quote:
"Not a single judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis's rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention," said William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, the now-married Kentucky couple that sued Davis for damages, in a statement to ABC News.
This is retarded, even for MAGA echo chamber nonsense.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 7:23 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
It seems like this is primarily about the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause and is almost only tangentially related to Obergefell, ie, if Obergefell is deemed invalid, her actions would not violate any constitutional right, nullifying the basis for the suit and damages, but doesn't actually challenge Obergfell directly. Am I off base?
Not really.
They're just throwing in the Ogberfell stuff for trolling or PR/clicks, I imagine. It has nothing to do with the actual case at hand.
Charlatans will charlatan.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 7:23 pm to northshorebamaman
Yes. From what I have seen people discussing about this on other places this is sort of a back door way at attacking it
Posted on 8/11/25 at 7:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They're just throwing in the Ogberfell stuff for trolling or PR/clicks, I imagine. It has nothing to do with the actual case at hand.
Never change. I could accept something like maybe it’s not the primary reason or purpose at hand, but “nothing to do with the actual case” is an actually dumb statement. And as I’ve said many times I don’t think you’re dumb.
Page 9 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News