- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:39 am to Houag80
So is Slo
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:40 am to td01241
quote:
And she was sent to prison. Hardly a civil judgment
quote:
Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed for six days in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to a gay couple on religious grounds, is appealing a $100,000 jury verdict for emotional damages plus $260,000 for attorneys fees.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:40 am to td01241
If scotus retracts gay marriage protection congress will pass, and Trump will sign, a bill legalizing it.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The USSC being asked to overturn a case is close to a nothing burger.
The case is being argued by Liberty Council who've presented and won cases before SCOTUS.
Just curious..... How many cases have you presented to SCOTUS and won?
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:41 am to FightinTigersDammit
No argument here. 
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:41 am to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
So is Slo
I'm laughing at the idiocy of OP
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:41 am to lake chuck fan
quote:
The case is being argued by Liberty Council who've presented and won cases before SCOTUS.
That has nothing to do with my comment.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:42 am to SlowFlowPro
Everyone else is laughing at you.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:43 am to SlowFlowPro
Anything that makes you look dumb or presents counter arguments to your own emotional rants, which boil down to muh Tim pool, isn’t relevant.
How convenient
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
There's a long process before the writ would be accepted.
So before or after the midterms?
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:45 am to td01241
quote:
Anything that makes you look dumb or presents counter arguments t
That comment did neither.
What does the group arguing the motion have to do with the chance of getting a writ? That's a form of argument from authority.
quote:
own emotional rants,
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:45 am to td01241
Never going to happen.
Should it? Absolutely. The opinion is a complete fricking joke.
However, we've basically crossed the Rubicon on that issue. They won’t go back. It'll probably be a 5-4 decision. The three liberal nut jobs will vote for it, of course. They'll almost certainly be joined by Roberts. The fifth will probably be Coney Barrett.
Should it? Absolutely. The opinion is a complete fricking joke.
However, we've basically crossed the Rubicon on that issue. They won’t go back. It'll probably be a 5-4 decision. The three liberal nut jobs will vote for it, of course. They'll almost certainly be joined by Roberts. The fifth will probably be Coney Barrett.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:45 am to GumboPot
quote:
So before or after the midterms?
I doubt you have to worry about this one.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:45 am to td01241
Slowprowflo is retarded but unfortunately correct here. No way in hell the court grants that lady’s petition for cert.
Would be cleaner for the court to just knock out all the fugazi fourteenth amendment bullshite with the birthright citizenship case anyways.
Would be cleaner for the court to just knock out all the fugazi fourteenth amendment bullshite with the birthright citizenship case anyways.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:48 am to MMauler
Robert’s voted against it the first time.
Only 4 justices who weren’t there the first time were Barret, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Jackson.
If Robert’s doesn’t change his opinion I see it coming down at 6-3 or 5-4 if barret is wet in the affirmative to overturn it
Only 4 justices who weren’t there the first time were Barret, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Jackson.
If Robert’s doesn’t change his opinion I see it coming down at 6-3 or 5-4 if barret is wet in the affirmative to overturn it
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:49 am to Cockopotamus
quote:
Would be cleaner for the court to just knock out all the fugazi fourteenth amendment bullshite with the birthright citizenship case anyways.
That case would deal with a completely different part of the 14A, though.
The text at issue with BRC isn't going to have much, if any, overlap with substantive Due Process.
The larger issue is how you get there. The abortion issue took decades of chipping away at the edges to get to a point where it became absurd not to revisit. This is much more of a set binary issue that won't permit the same strategy. You're going to need some state to straight up deny marriage licenses (via state-based statute) to gay couples.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:50 am to td01241
frick em let then get married, just ban them from ever adopting kids
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:50 am to MMauler
quote:
The fifth will probably be Coney Barrett.
I can’t see ACB voting to uphold it.
Posted on 8/11/25 at 9:51 am to LordSaintly
quote:
I can’t see ACB voting to uphold it.
I want to see Clarence Thomas revisit Loving v. Virginia, which he curiously left out of his concurrence in Dobbs.
Page 2 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News