- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Study of 1.3 million women found jabbed women had 33% fewer successful conceptions
Posted on 6/26/25 at 10:48 am to TenWheelsForJesus
Posted on 6/26/25 at 10:48 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
That would explain an overall lower birthrate, but it doesn't explain why vaxxed women had 33% less successful conceptions than their unvaxxed counterparts.
How many women were in each group
What was the rate of obesity and diabetes in each group etc etc
I don’t see any of that information in the study and it absolutely makes a difference
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:35 pm to Eurocat
quote:
This could also just show that Czech ladies chose to not have kids during the very uncertain health and economic period of Covid and right after it.
That is a 20.77% decrease in reproductive capacity in just two years during the three years AFTER COVID. That is WELL beyond statistically significant. That’s historic.
You seem to be brain dead.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:46 pm to Night Vision
I proudly oppose this vaccine and believe these low conception rates might also have something to do with the kind of men that would attempt to procreate with this segment of women. More than likely, their male partners suffer from higher rates of sterility.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:53 pm to Night Vision
Sad. I wonder if they’ve been able to see how minor girls have seen any issues.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:03 pm to Night Vision
Anecdotally, as an unjabbed man, I did knock up a jabbed woman a year ago.
I tend to believe the jabs hurt the men more than the women. I know everyone jumps to the depopulation conclusions as it fits the narrative and has a boogie man involved too, however, I also think there were competing priorities to the mass jab program. For one thing, the jabs might have created a great financial boost to the IVF industry, which is population control by other means. Especially if it only further neutered the men rather than the women.
It just seems illogical to target sterilization of the women, especially because you might need them (e.g. these tech CEOs who are impregnating tons and tons of women).
I tend to believe the jabs hurt the men more than the women. I know everyone jumps to the depopulation conclusions as it fits the narrative and has a boogie man involved too, however, I also think there were competing priorities to the mass jab program. For one thing, the jabs might have created a great financial boost to the IVF industry, which is population control by other means. Especially if it only further neutered the men rather than the women.
It just seems illogical to target sterilization of the women, especially because you might need them (e.g. these tech CEOs who are impregnating tons and tons of women).
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:33 pm to sledgehammer
I met fauci somewhat recently. Cool dude
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:38 pm to Night Vision
We all said this was population control.
Another conspiracy theory becomes fact.
Another conspiracy theory becomes fact.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:40 pm to Night Vision
Oh the bright side, WAY less women that were raised by idiot white liberals will reproduce
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:47 pm to Night Vision
Questions have been asked and answered. It’s a non-issue except on the internet.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 9:06 pm to Night Vision
Bill Gates just had Christmas arrive early.
Posted on 6/26/25 at 9:48 pm to Blutarsky
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 8:04 pm
Back to top

0







