Started By
Message

re: Study of 1.3 million women found jabbed women had 33% fewer successful conceptions

Posted on 6/26/25 at 10:48 am to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36597 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 10:48 am to
quote:

That would explain an overall lower birthrate, but it doesn't explain why vaxxed women had 33% less successful conceptions than their unvaxxed counterparts.


How many women were in each group

What was the rate of obesity and diabetes in each group etc etc


I don’t see any of that information in the study and it absolutely makes a difference
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60285 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

This could also just show that Czech ladies chose to not have kids during the very uncertain health and economic period of Covid and right after it.


That is a 20.77% decrease in reproductive capacity in just two years during the three years AFTER COVID. That is WELL beyond statistically significant. That’s historic.

You seem to be brain dead.
Posted by Chingon Ag
Member since Nov 2018
3984 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:46 pm to
I proudly oppose this vaccine and believe these low conception rates might also have something to do with the kind of men that would attempt to procreate with this segment of women. More than likely, their male partners suffer from higher rates of sterility.
Posted by HagaDaga
Member since Oct 2020
6161 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 1:53 pm to
Sad. I wonder if they’ve been able to see how minor girls have seen any issues.
Posted by roothog1
Member since Apr 2021
44 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:03 pm to
Anecdotally, as an unjabbed man, I did knock up a jabbed woman a year ago.

I tend to believe the jabs hurt the men more than the women. I know everyone jumps to the depopulation conclusions as it fits the narrative and has a boogie man involved too, however, I also think there were competing priorities to the mass jab program. For one thing, the jabs might have created a great financial boost to the IVF industry, which is population control by other means. Especially if it only further neutered the men rather than the women.

It just seems illogical to target sterilization of the women, especially because you might need them (e.g. these tech CEOs who are impregnating tons and tons of women).
Posted by hsgeoboy
Member since Aug 2017
1136 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 2:33 pm to
I met fauci somewhat recently. Cool dude
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
11726 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:38 pm to
We all said this was population control.

Another conspiracy theory becomes fact.
Posted by Feelthebarn
Lower Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
3615 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:40 pm to
Oh the bright side, WAY less women that were raised by idiot white liberals will reproduce
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
7761 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:42 pm to
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
67649 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 8:47 pm to
Questions have been asked and answered. It’s a non-issue except on the internet.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
39311 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 9:06 pm to
Bill Gates just had Christmas arrive early.
Posted by DarthTiger
Member since Sep 2005
3222 posts
Posted on 6/26/25 at 9:48 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 8:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram