- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Stephen Miller just accused Congressional Democrats of demanding INSURRECTION
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:39 am to MikkUGA
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:39 am to MikkUGA
quote:
Name one unlawful order from any branch of the military that has been given.
I didn't say there had been, but this is the statement
quote:
The American people need you to stand up for our laws and our Constitution.
So my question remains.
5
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:46 am to Timeoday
It’s not insurrection because they only instructed them to not to obey unconstitutional illegal orders, which by definition they shouldn’t. The question is what are these supposedly unconstitutional illegal orders and who is issuing these unconstitutional illegal orders?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:49 am to cssamerican
quote:
It’s not insurrection because they only instructed them to not to obey unconstitutional illegal orders,
Exactly.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:49 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So my question remains.
They also said they the threat against our constitution was coming from here at home (implying their commander in chief) and told them not to follow his orders. It is absolutely seditious. And you know this. Stop being such an insufferable douchebag.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:51 am to AlterEd
quote:
and told them not to follow his orders.
Only his ILLEGAL orders.
quote:
It is absolutely seditious.
How can you be seditious while following the law?
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 5:53 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:53 am to SlowFlowPro
I repeat. They also said that the military was sworn to an oath to defend this country and said that the threat was coming from here at home (implying Trump).
I see you're just incapable of being anything other than an insufferable douchebag.
I see you're just incapable of being anything other than an insufferable douchebag.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:55 am to Timeoday
The Deep State is being threatened so it will pull out all of the stops to keep itself in power...
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:56 am to AlterEd
quote:
I see you're just incapable of being anything other than an insufferable douchebag.
Says the guy who can't answer and is pivoting to ad homs instead
The irony is that the same people throwing out the billy badass terms in this thread also think that Brennan, Clapper, etc. following Obama's orders with CFH also committed sedition, ,even though they were just following orders.
So which is it?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:58 am to SlowFlowPro
4comeys the independent putting in the hours.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 5:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Only his ILLEGAL orders.
Which is determined by whomever whenever they feel like it. Democrats are trying to sow division in the military like they have with judiciary. Where anything a person doesn't like they can make their own decision on.
You anarchist get off on this shite.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:08 am to geoag58
quote:
Because they want even just one leftist scumbag member of the military to say no to Trumps war on the narco-terrorists so they have their poster boy going into the midterms. Gotta wonder if these scumbags are already on the payroll of the Chinese and their vassals the narco terrorists?
If not on the payroll, these Dems obviously must be profiting somehow from the drugs/$.
God Speed President Trump.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:11 am to Warfox
quote:
If not on the payroll, these Dems obviously must be profiting somehow from the drugs/$.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:12 am to Timeoday
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
and told them not to follow his orders.
Only his ILLEGAL orders.
I mean they are all suggesting (really outright saying) that these people are being constantly subjected to these “illegal orders” that they need to be ignoring, without spelling out what those are - I guess leaving wide open for interpretation.
It’s bullshite of the highest order, at best.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:15 am to Harry Boutte
"How is reminding people who took an oath to defend the Constitution that we need them to defend the Constitution in any way treasonous or seditious?
"
When you can actually identify what part of the Constitution the current administration is infringing upon, then you might have a legal argument, otherwise you need to shut up and go sit in the corner with your Hot Wheels and play while the adults discuss matters.
"
When you can actually identify what part of the Constitution the current administration is infringing upon, then you might have a legal argument, otherwise you need to shut up and go sit in the corner with your Hot Wheels and play while the adults discuss matters.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:15 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I guess leaving wide open for interpretation.
It's just political puffery.
Your overly-emotive types just run to silliness like "treason" or "sedition" because that's how they've been primed as NPCs.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:26 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP knows exactly what they’re asking for here…we all do.
He is locking arms with democrats to bastardize the spirit and possibly letter of the law, while pleading for intelligence and military to disobey orders from the CoC.
“The libertarian” never once encouraged these same people to do this from 2021-2024.
He is locking arms with democrats to bastardize the spirit and possibly letter of the law, while pleading for intelligence and military to disobey orders from the CoC.
“The libertarian” never once encouraged these same people to do this from 2021-2024.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:27 am to G2160
quote:
SFP knows exactly what they’re asking for here…we all do.
quote:
He is locking arms with democrats to bastardize the spirit and possibly letter of the law, while pleading for intelligence and military to disobey orders from the CoC.
Well, you failed your own test.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:30 am to lsusteve1
Mr Corndog made a very wise post. The Democrats want someo\ne to refuse to fire on those narco boats claiming its an illegal order.
Well I say let's find out. Arrest them for Seditious Conspiracy. Theyre on video telling members of the United States Armed Forces to disobey an order from the President. They will have your back if you do. Clear conspiracy.
Arrest every one of them and lets find out who's right.
Well I say let's find out. Arrest them for Seditious Conspiracy. Theyre on video telling members of the United States Armed Forces to disobey an order from the President. They will have your back if you do. Clear conspiracy.
Arrest every one of them and lets find out who's right.
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 6:32 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 6:34 am to SlowFlowPro
No, I’m right.
They worded their video very specifically to avoid violation of the law, while encouraging violation of the law.
They worded their video very specifically to avoid violation of the law, while encouraging violation of the law.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News