- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:21 pm to BarberitosDawg
quote:
The one and only reason these former liberal lawyers were indicted was an act of revenge by Obamamites because POTUS mentioned their plight on Network TV coverage.
They know it has 0.0 chance of success, but that's not the point to social scumbag justice tripe.
Correct. The message here is not even meant to be directed to THEM (the McCloskeys).
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:24 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Its very simple, if you come on my property and threaten my family with death or harm, I will worry about grand juries and trials after the fact.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:28 pm to jatilen
quote:
Only prosecutors are allowed to present evidence to grand juries, and they are secret proceedings.
According to judges in Louisville, they are not secret proceedings and the public has a right to know everything that happens in them.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:30 pm to PrivatePublic
quote:
Exhibiting a weapon on your own property is a fricking crime
No, it's not. The castle doctrine even extends to your entire property in MO, not just inside your home or vehicle.
But laws don't matter anymore.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:33 pm to BobABooey
quote:
2005 Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties.
§ 563.041. Use of physical force in defense of property
2. A person shall not use deadly force upon another person under the circumstances specified in subsection 1 of this section unless:
(1) He or she reasonably believes that such deadly force is necessary to protect himself, or herself or her unborn child, or another against death, serious physical injury, or any forcible felony;
(2) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle lawfully occupied by such person; ?or
(3) Such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters, remains after unlawfully entering, or attempts to unlawfully enter private property that is owned or leased by an individual, or is occupied by an individual who has been given specific authority by the property owner to occupy the property, claiming a justification of using protective force under this section.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:35 pm to jatilen
Your rights are given to you by your local shithead DA
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:37 pm to swolverine
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/17/20 at 10:15 am
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:38 pm to mtntiger
quote:
Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
….and that is what they are hanging their hat on....they were waving their weapons around at the crowd...nevermind the crowd had busted down their gate and was on their property
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:38 pm to teke184
No mustard and processed ham? I'd indict.
Indict the McCloskeys? No way in hell.
Indict the McCloskeys? No way in hell.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:39 pm to NYNolaguy1
#hottake
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:42 pm to BobABooey
Displaying a weapon for the purpose of self defense is not a crime. You don't have to be a Constitutional Scholar to understand this.
quote:
Exhibiting a weapon on your own property is a fricking crime ?
2005 Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties.
quote:
571.030. 1. A person commits the crime of unlawful use of weapons if he or she knowingly: (4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:47 pm to WildManGoose
quote:
The pistol was not functional. It was a movie prop. Meaning they couldn't be charged for that gun. So, the crime lab fixed the gun in order to charge them. I guess they just went with tampering lol. Honk Honk.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:47 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
nevermind the crowd had busted down their gate and was on their property
and nevermind the fact that these types of angry mobs had been responsible for a retired police officer being shot and killed in that very city just days prior, had been burning buildings, etc. But, yeah, this DA never had any intention of thinking maybe these people had justifiable reasons to fear for their lives.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 4:53 pm to jatilen
It looks to me that the Dems of the St. Louis are conspiring to violate the civil rights of the McCloskeys.
That's a federal crime.
That's a federal crime.
This post was edited on 10/6/20 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 10/6/20 at 5:03 pm to jatilen
George Soros County Prosecutor Kim Gardner doin' work.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 5:04 pm to themunch
quote:
The PoPo made it ready to fire.
every gun should be assumed ready to fire if it's displayed in anger. how would the protesters there that day know that it was inoperable if it was?
Posted on 10/6/20 at 5:06 pm to Chappy
quote:
Missouri RS 571:030 Someone didn’t read the whole statute
The poster asked how that could be a crime and I provided the explanation. I didn’t say I agreed with that being a crime (I don’t) but I answered their question. The poster didn’t ask what defense they could possibly use or what the entire statute said.
Triggered bunch of snowflakes in here.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 5:08 pm to jatilen
The grand jury was convened for one reason: this likely prohibits any ability of the McCloskey's to sue Kim Gardner for malicious prosecution.
Posted on 10/6/20 at 5:09 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
every gun should be assumed ready to fire if it's displayed in anger. how would the protesters there that day know that it was inoperable if it was?
Oh...you're serious.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News