- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SS Administration to require in-person identity checks for new and existing recipients
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:34 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
maybe don’t fire everyone who works there before requiring people show up and check in if they want the benefits they paid into.
1
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:37 am to GumboPot
Good - long time coming. I suggested this long ago. In person. Redundant verification. Complete audit of US citizenship. Clean up voter rolls, Social Security, the whole deal.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:37 am to SDVTiger
quote:
The change will apply to new Social Security applicants
quote:
and existing recipients who want to change their direct deposit information.
quote:
62yr olds with these issues?
and 90 year olds.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:42 am to SammyTiger
For *years*, fraud analysts have been sounding the alarm on social Security’s lax system for changing bank account information. I remember seeing articles on this in the mid 2000s.
Reuters is reporting that the change was recommended by major bank heads during a February 18th meeting with WH officials.
What is your preferred solution to add additional screening to prevent fraudsters from easily redirecting funds?
Reuters is reporting that the change was recommended by major bank heads during a February 18th meeting with WH officials.
What is your preferred solution to add additional screening to prevent fraudsters from easily redirecting funds?
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:44 am to MMauler
quote:
Inb4 SloF*ckingPussy assures us all that requiring people to prove who they are to get Social Security is clearly racist and automatically unconstitutional. He’ll cite us a late 1800’s-era Supreme Court case which has nothing to do with the issue but assure us all that we’re just not smart enough (like him) to see the “real” nuanced meaning of the case.
we love Slo but this is epic 
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:47 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Is it your belief that the elderly have an easy time with mobility and transportation?
Do they find ways to get to Dr appointments? This is no different.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:48 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Is it your belief that the elderly have an easy time with mobility and transportation?
Sorry that your grandma died 14 years ago and that you're still cashing her SS checks.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 12:56 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
at least the elderly are notoriously capable of traveling to and from places.
They're already on SS. It's the new kids that need to pove their citizenship..
You should set ou a fund em all site to give accotdingly.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:07 am to 1loyalbamafan
This is the pathetic state our country has come to first of all there is no wide scale fraud it will take weeks months to complete this task most of you know nothing about the SSI program security system . There is no100 million dollar fraud and you know it it’s a roost to dig dipper into your private lives .
Posted on 3/20/25 at 1:21 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
maybe this solution but they fund it and staff it.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:11 am to NawlinsTiger9
Yes, at least for new recipients and any existing one that is changing banking information. If you can do that, you should easily be able to take a ride to an office
Posted on 3/20/25 at 2:30 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Damn you mad
Damn, you ghey
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:42 am to DallasTiger11
I can see it now " it is racist" they can't get ID's yadda yadda yadda
Posted on 3/20/25 at 3:50 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
s for the OP, at least the elderly are notoriously capable of traveling to and from places. Seems like a great plan
Read again. In person is NOT required!
Posted on 3/20/25 at 5:31 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
is no wide scale fraud
Is this satire?
quote:
you know it it’s a roost to dig dipper into your private lives .
Ruse? To dig deeper into the lives of social security recipients?
Like how? To make sure the recipient is the correct person? Like that?
I’m okay with that.
I’m pretty sure the SSA doesn't care if old Uncle Joe is dating a crack whore who’s targeting his SS check.
This post was edited on 3/20/25 at 5:32 am
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:03 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
NawlinsTiger9
@ you defending fraud
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:05 am to GumboPot
quote:If that is what it takes, I'll be happy to comply.
SS Administration to require in-person identity checks for new and existing recipients
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:07 am to NawlinsTiger9
Look how low far left wackos like yourself will stoop to keep the grift going.
fricking. Impressive.
fricking. Impressive.
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:10 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
Mr Cell Phone
Paging Retard Finder
Posted on 3/20/25 at 6:11 am to Mr Cell Phone
Found the retard!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News