re: Southern poverty law center indicted by grand jury. Laundered $ to white supremacy groups

quote:

---

I'm only giving analysis of what's been presented, if that's what you're implying.

I've been pretty good with stating what is/isn't stated by the indictment.

---

Also SFP in same thread....

quote:

---

So when we find out these people were sincerely part of the organization prior to being snitches for SPLC

---

quote:

---

Do you need the legal definition of theft, or something?

The informant stole 25 boxes from a racist group he was apart of.

---

Based on the narrative as set forth in the indictment, it's not even really exactly clear that what HE did would be deemed illegal or necessarily rise to the level of even "minor theft."

I recognize they chose to use the word "stole" for whatever reason of course. I'm just saying.

Since you seem intent upon calling me a bot, I will repost the link to the author. I was brought to his site from a posting on another forum. Your willful disbelief does not benefit your allegation.

LINK

quote:

---

Do you think the SLPC was the only group paying these guys?

---

No idea.

Someone who still watches that MSM garbage, please keep us informed as to how they cover this.

quote:

---

None of which is legal activity for a charity

---

The allegations are fraud, ie, the donors would consider the behavior fraudulent. Do we really think they would consider this a misuse of their donations?

And the larger point is this destroys many of the dishonest talking points emerging post-indictment.

quote:

---

The SPLC is not a law enforcement agency.

---

It's not illegal for them to pay for information

quote:

---

They are a non profit who ginned up hate crimes

---

Now you're engaging in the bad behavior.

quote:

---

I don't see anything about the indictment as necessitating any of these individuals having to have performed "illegal" acts on their own.

---

I agree, but it's been a dishonest talking point about the indictment, generally. Again, I just gave the dog the bone here to avoid minor squabbles

quote:

---

This is so awesome. The SPLC was always obviously fraudulent, but it's great to be able to throw this in the face of the true believers who were stupid enough to claim otherwise.

---

Agreed. I think most realize that this can be a big case. But I think even those that realize it, are still underestimating just how big it can be.

I mean, it's just SPLC. They're big, but not THAT big. They don't affect my daily life. Right?

WRONG.

It's organizations like SPLC, ACLU, USAID, Rainbow Coalition, ACORN, and many many others who serve as the mechanism for much of the corruption in this country. They function under the guise of righteousness, but in reality, they are evil. They run cover and allow politicians to do nefarious things. They launder money and provide kickbacks to politicians. They fund most of the wokeness and DEI initiatives. And probably several other activities that any rational person would not approve of... we just haven't been smart enough to figure those out yet because the schemes are put together very well and have several layers to them.

quote:

---

Holy fricking shite

---

So, you think it would have been a huge story regardless?

Tell us, what do you think the story would have been, if things weren't planned and coordinated?

quote:

---

Not to derail the discussion, but I did not know until recently that DataRepublican was deaf and mute. She puts out some interesting threads.

---

One of only a dozen or so accounts on twitter that I rarely question.

Due to the sheer amount of info she puts out there, I'm sure some of it has been inaccurate...but I have yet to find any.