Started By
Message

re: South Carolina trying to keep new LSU president Tate

Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:59 am to
Posted by Tigertrot
BATON ROUGE
Member since Nov 2008
123 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 9:59 am to
Just out of curiosity, is Richard Lipsey on board with this hire?
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4012 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:25 am to
quote:

CRT is a fairy tale. Should he implement measures based on CRT, he needs to be cancelled.


Your using the same tactics the far left uses that you criticize. As I states, F King Alexander was a Critical theorist himself. No push back, was it because he wasn't Black? And as I stated, I never liked the guy.

But F King and his push to Wholistic Admission standards at LSU was based on "Critical theory" applied not only to race, but gender as well, etc.

So my point still stands, when Jindal's LSU BOS hired F King, I don't remember this level of push back from lay persons and those who follow LSU football.

The only criticism of Jindal's LSU BOS hiring F King came from LSU tenured Faculty who were against him due to his total lack of standing as an Academician. He has no publication record to speak of, still doesn't, never obtained tenure at an R1 University and got his first job as President at Murray State again following Big Daddy.

F King comes from the area of Education and worked in higher education in "education", read the same theories that Professor Tate read.

Nobody attacked F King's hire like they are doing here for Tate's hire. That is the fact.
Posted by scott8811
Ratchet City, LA
Member since Oct 2014
11322 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:26 am to
please lord let it be
Posted by UptownnMike
Uptown New Orleans
Member since Aug 2015
4067 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:27 am to
Gotcha
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26738 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Willfully ignorant.


About what, specifically?
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4012 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:34 am to
quote:

ust out of curiosity, is Richard Lipsey on board with this hire?


His daughter is on the board and she supported him
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66445 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:34 am to
quote:

About what, specifically?


What this guy is actually out out there in his research.

I strongly Encourage people to read his recent work and his solo stuff. It’s not the communist manifesto mixed with black Hitler.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 10:36 am
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56245 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Again, you don’t want to know what he thinks, you want an easy label and to make a reaction.

Yes I do, so either you do not know or will not answer. Critical race theory, does he believe in it or not?
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Again, you don’t want to know what he thinks, you want an easy label and to make a reaction. Cant you see it’s willfully ignorant to form an opinion of the man without actually reading what’s he’s been putting out in the past 10 year.


Sammy peddling his bullshite in another thread where he’s too ashamed to admit he’s a critical race theory supporting racist and instead tries to goad people into learning more about his racist, destructive ideology.

Can’t wait to see your posts encouraging people to really look at who David Duke is and what he writes about instead of automatically dismissing him for supporting white supremacy.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26738 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:39 am to
quote:

So my question to you is given the qualifications or in the case lack of with O'Keefe and F King, did you go after them the same way are with Tate (who is in fact better qualified than those 2 guys).


I supported O'Keefe and did not support King. I believe the position is more of an administrative position, rather than purely academic. I thought, rightly so, that O'Keefe was a strong administrator and leader.

King was a pencil-necked, academic liberal who had no business being anywhere near LSU.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66445 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:39 am to
Open Your Eyes...

But not to like read something more than the title.
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:42 am to
Absolutely. My eyes don’t need to read anything about your hateful, divisive ideology.

Why are you too ashamed to admit you support critical race theory? Why don’t you encourage people to be more open minded about David Duke?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66445 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:43 am to
quote:

King was a pencil-necked, academic liberal who had no business being anywhere near LSU.


King was barely an academic. He was an Assistant Professor for 3 whole years before taking over his dad’s job as a school president like it was the family business.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66445 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Absolutely. My eyes don’t need to read anything about your hateful, divisive ideology.



Lol, fricking sheep.

quote:

Why are you too ashamed to admit you support critical race theory? Why don’t you encourage people to be more open minded about David Duke?


Why are you against forming an educated opinion.

If someone said: David Duke wasn’t that bad, look at this: I would Probably read it.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 10:47 am
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4012 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:47 am to
quote:

I supported O'Keefe and did not support King. I believe the position is more of an administrative position, rather than purely academic. I thought, rightly so, that O'Keefe was a strong administrator and leader.

King was a pencil-necked, academic liberal who had no business being anywhere near LSU.


Well I don't know Emmert or Lombardi's politics but supported both. Far as I know, they both may have been Democrats. Don't care, both did good jobs. O'Keefe I was neutral on but I don't think he did a bad job. In fact, handled the Katrina and Rita situation quite well. Raised Money and was liked by students. So I gave him a B+ while he was here. He was clearly a Republican as he worked for Bush 2.

F King, is a Liberal dem. Agree. But again, he was not the man for the job. He did not like SEC sports culture and if you are going to hire an Academic, hire one with credentials. He was a F from day one and F+++ when he left.

F King
Posted by JKChesterton
Member since Dec 2012
4012 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:50 am to
quote:

supported O'Keefe and did not support King. I believe the position is more of an administrative position, rather than purely academic. I thought, rightly so, that O'Keefe was a strong administrator and leader.

King was a pencil-necked, academic liberal who had no business being anywhere near LSU.


Under the old structure, the LSU President is indeed an Administration position but the Chancellor is more of an academic position. And there lies the problem. Jindal coupled the positions together. Personally, never should have happened. The President is the President of the LSU System and the Chancellor should be totally involved with LSU in Baton Rouge.

Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Lol, fricking sheep.


Whatever you say, racist.

quote:

Why are you against forming an educated opinion.


Because there is nothing to be educated about when it comes to automatically making decisions about people based entirely on the color of their skin and nothing else.

quote:

If someone said: David Duke wasn’t that bad, look at this: I would Probably read it.


That’s not even close to what I asked. Why are you afraid to answer very simple questions about your belief system?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66445 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Because there is nothing to be educated about when it comes to automatically making decisions about people based entirely on the color of their skin and nothing else.


If that is what he was saying you’d have a point.

But you don’t know what’s he’s saying. So...
quote:

That’s not even close to what I asked. Why are you afraid to answer very simple questions about your belief system?


You asked why I am Not defending David Duke.

Unlike Tate, David Duke has said objectively racist things. David Duke toned down for the mainstream is as racist as you claim CRT is. David Duke when he was open was just openly racist.

Find 1 quote from anything Tate has said or written when here calls white primitive animals.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 11:03 am
Posted by SOL2
Dallas burbs
Member since Jan 2020
4758 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 11:08 am to
Lib is in
Posted by scott8811
Ratchet City, LA
Member since Oct 2014
11322 posts
Posted on 5/12/21 at 11:27 am to
quote:


Nobody attacked F King's hire like they are doing here for Tate's hire. That is the fact.


True...but I'm now attacking the Tate hire BECAUSE of thep job FKA did and knowing we are not changing paths
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram